Exposed
Exposed
Joined: Jan 7, 2022
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 1
Thanks for this post from:
OnceDearWTflush
January 7th, 2022 at 7:46:12 AM permalink
2 hour interview with Mikki coming up this weekend on Dan Druffs radio show
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
  • Threads: 154
  • Posts: 20269
January 7th, 2022 at 8:04:20 AM permalink
Quote: Exposed

2 hour interview with Mikki coming up this weekend on Dan Druffs radio show
link to original post

let's hope Dan doesn't p**** out and he actually plays hard ball.

The problem we have.... this is a well-crafted situation where Mikki has said multiple times that he won't tell anybody exactly how or where his Advantage comes from, therefore, it would be fairly hard to debunk his claims that he has an advantage and he is beating the casinos.


It's in my opinion that he knows damn well that's the key element of all this. It's a perfect cover story since the logic dictates that if he tells someone it could possibly ruin his gig, therefore, he must keep it a secret. It's pretty hard to argue with that.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
  • Threads: 13
  • Posts: 3332
January 7th, 2022 at 8:09:20 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post



That would appear to be an endorsement of Spencer and his videos, at least on this subject.

Urging people to watch another video of his shortly after would seem to be a furtherance of the prior endorsement.
link to original post



The one video, yes. In most ways on a personal level I would side with Spencer or I would tend to agree with the majority of what Spencer was bringing forward as an observer.

However, IMO and hopefully that of most others, since I did not say I totally endorse or Spencer is always spot on, etc, whatever else Spencer comes out with does not automatically obtain my approval and endorsements.

I don’t believe I urged people to watch a video. Urging, would have to be, IMO, a bit ‘stronger’ than ‘watch’, no?

But maybe I am wrong?
link to original post



Perhaps you misjudge your own powers of persuasion?
May the cards fall in your favor.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
January 7th, 2022 at 8:15:47 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: OnceDear


Use of single word sentences in English.
E.g.
Imperatives or commands (example: Watch!)

"Watch." is a complete sentence. The sentence commenced with a capital letter and was terminated by a period.
If it were referring to timepieces, or if it were just a verb, we would normally need a second word.

Now. I did not use an exclamation mark, so I did not URGE you to click that spoiler button. I 'suggested', 'commanded', or we might say 'recommended' that you click on it. You clicked on it. Thank you.
Now, Let's all stop assuming what we each mean or are thinking. Let's just read what we see on the screen and let's not argue about what we infer?
Click!

link to original post



Within the definition that was contained in the dictionary under your ‘click’ for ‘click’:


“to fit or agree exactly”

Which we all do when we click on click?

Disclaimer. Lol, I’m joking, :)
link to original post

Well done. You saw an amusing subtlety that I had not intended. But if I had, I'd have been proud.
Let's agree exactly.
link to original post



We do.

Side note. You would get a kick out of a memo a couple of months ago I received for my department to check a vendors quality of work with their parking lot surface repainting of the lines for the spaces. More specifically the memo writer wanted to assure the lines were straight.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
  • Threads: 154
  • Posts: 20269
January 7th, 2022 at 8:46:09 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: AxelWolf

I have no idea if Mikki has some back-end deals with the casinos or what kind of profits he makes from his social media stuff. There's certainly a potential +EV situation given the right situation, especially if he has the money and knowledge to negotiate a favorable deal. I believe he actually does. I can see a situation where casinos are/were willing to bend over backwards offering player-friendly deals(+EV) to get a shot at his and his connections money only to realize after the fact that they have been duped.

With that being said, I just lost any faith I had in Spencer Cornelia's investigation abilities. It's clear he is capable of being easily bamboozled. He looks at ONE(one he Mikki chooses himself) of Mikki's casino online casino player accounts and deems him legit. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

It doesn't matter if you look at three or four or five or six, it's the one account that has a massive loss on it and that totality of all his play that really matters. Even then, you would have to factor in good old positive variance.

If Mikki's investors don't have an actual advantage(Fyi Mikki could be making something off the back end for himself) and he's just using some Marty system or whatever, Spencer Cornelia just helped perpetuate a financially dangerous situation to some gullible ignorant people.

It seems like it's only people who have a s*** ton of money to lose, that this has the potential to affect.
link to original post



I thought twice about it, (Axel and I have wrestled a bit, LOL) but his rendering of Spencer’s video described in his post above is excellent IMO!

However I have done zero investigation or read anything more than an industry wide bulletin/memo regarding both Mikki and Spencer. My end of the memo was to alert another department’s personnel if those two individuals are recognized on the floor. That dies not imply anything is wrong or against the gaming regulations that govern our properties.

Again, I would side with Axel’s interpretations.
link to original post

I honestly don't know what to think about Mikki. Many aspects seem legit and some things don't make sense given the information we have. He definitely seems like a smart, likable cool guy. I do know for sure he cannot beat a -EV game without a mathematical advantage. He may be winning giving a limited number of hands using some kind of Martingale system that hasn't crashed yet. Or, like I said, he's getting some kind of rebates or back-end stuff that actually gives him an advantage.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
billryan
billryan
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
  • Threads: 217
  • Posts: 13347
January 7th, 2022 at 9:32:31 AM permalink
I don't watch much of these videos, but would it be illegal for a casino to allow a person to play on a tournament type machine that pays more often and pretend it is real money.
In other words, can a casino set a machine to pay out 130% for these videos but not have to pay out the money. Is there anything to stop me from renting out the casino in Searchlight for a few hours when they are dead and have the machines set to pay off far better than normal?
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
January 7th, 2022 at 10:08:55 AM permalink
Mikki does makes total sense when he gives his rationale for wins in relation to bankrolls, drawdowns and certain clusters or periods of timing, etc, he talks about.

I see it done all the time, larger bankrolls and hitting it hard for short periods of wagering versus the so called grind, shoe after shoe of playing. As well, with small or smaller money versus the larger bankrolls and buy ins.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
  • Threads: 154
  • Posts: 20269
January 7th, 2022 at 12:45:59 PM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Mikki does makes total sense when he gives his rationale for wins in relation to bankrolls, drawdowns and certain clusters or periods of timing, etc, he talks about.

I see it done all the time, larger bankrolls and hitting it hard for short periods of wagering versus the so called grind, shoe after shoe of playing. As well, with small or smaller money versus the larger bankrolls and buy ins.
link to original post

That's the total opposite of what actually makes sense, if that's how he's claiming to beat baccarat, then I say it's all BS.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
MrV
MrV
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
  • Threads: 340
  • Posts: 7541
January 7th, 2022 at 4:42:40 PM permalink
Any numbnuts can beat a negative expectation game in the short run: it's called "variance."

However maintaining a winning overall record in the long run is likely impossible or so unlikely as to be deemed such.

There are many examples of gamblers killing the house for a period of time, a period which some might consider the long run.

The guy who whacked Binion's for all their high denomination chips comes to mind, but then he lost them all back when his luck changed.

He had incredible luck and ran with a long streak, a "medium run" if you will, until it changed.

The math is inexorable: defy it at your own risk.
"What, me worry?"
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
  • Threads: 13
  • Posts: 3332
January 8th, 2022 at 3:51:25 AM permalink
Quote: billryan

I don't watch much of these videos, but would it be illegal for a casino to allow a person to play on a tournament type machine that pays more often and pretend it is real money.
In other words, can a casino set a machine to pay out 130% for these videos but not have to pay out the money. Is there anything to stop me from renting out the casino in Searchlight for a few hours when they are dead and have the machines set to pay off far better than normal?
link to original post



You may be thinking too small.
I believe this channel has their own machines, configured as they like.
I can't imagine a casino would want to do something like that, and I can imagine gaming enforcement would find a problem with it.
May the cards fall in your favor.

  • Jump to: