Quote: LoquaciousMoFWIf this idea holds up to the IRS's inevitable challenge, it could be a game changer. Vital Vegas via casino.org: https://www.casino.org/vitalvegas/new-slot-machine-helps-players-avoid-w-2g-tax-form-headaches/
link to original post
this is NOTHING new
i live in PA and have spoken with a person who manages a small private club which has VGT machines in it. They have the option to choose machines which pays a maximum of lower than the legal limit so they can dodge the tax forms and what not and that is from the manufacturer
Quote: heatmapQuote: LoquaciousMoFWIf this idea holds up to the IRS's inevitable challenge, it could be a game changer. Vital Vegas via casino.org: https://www.casino.org/vitalvegas/new-slot-machine-helps-players-avoid-w-2g-tax-form-headaches/
link to original post
this is NOTHING new
i live in PA and have spoken with a person who manages a small private club which has VGT machines in it. They have the option to choose machines which pays a maximum of lower than the legal limit so they can dodge the tax forms and what not and that is from the manufacturer
link to original post
I thought the PA small private club VGT's were capped at $1000 prize by law.
Perhaps we're thinking of different things.
Quote: DieterQuote: heatmapQuote: LoquaciousMoFWIf this idea holds up to the IRS's inevitable challenge, it could be a game changer. Vital Vegas via casino.org: https://www.casino.org/vitalvegas/new-slot-machine-helps-players-avoid-w-2g-tax-form-headaches/
link to original post
this is NOTHING new
i live in PA and have spoken with a person who manages a small private club which has VGT machines in it. They have the option to choose machines which pays a maximum of lower than the legal limit so they can dodge the tax forms and what not and that is from the manufacturer
link to original post
I thought the PA small private club VGT's were capped at $1000 prize by law.
Perhaps we're thinking of different things.
link to original post
well he was explaining it to me ... he may have not known and i definitely dont have knowledge of the laws that particularly
but he specifically mentioned it had to do with taxes
Yes, I can't imagine that anybody in the industry would want to set up a showdown with the Feds, which this will do. I wonder if the slot company had to offer an indemnity agreement to get the machines placed. Even if it is technically constructed to fall outside the reporting requirements, courts can and do cut through such constructions. For example of that, see the Areo case analyzed here: https://copyrightem.com/wnet-v-aereo-is-renting-a-tv-antenna-copyright-infringement The case eventually made it to the US Supreme Court; where the majority basically said, "if it looks, like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck" (not exactly a shining example of legal reasoning, IMHO). Wikipedia has a decent writeup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Cos.,_Inc._v._Aereo,_Inc.Quote: WizardI've had a similar idea for many years. Those in the industry I've bounced it off of just poo-poo'd it, with explanation.
link to original post
My only comment/complaint is that one of the screens indicated that the average payout is $1000.
Since $1000 is the top payout on the bonus, how could that also be the average?
Quote: DJTeddyBearVery cool idea.
My only comment/complaint is that one of the screens indicated that the average payout is $1000.
Since $1000 is the top payout on the bonus, how could that also be the average?
link to original post
One of the options is $100+ a spin