Thread Rating:
July 10th, 2015 at 2:55:19 AM
permalink
Hi all,
My first post here, so first thing first, congrats to the wizard for great site, I love the odds :)!
I'm hoping to find some help here as I don't manage to calculate myself following probabilities....
The number and probabilities for holdem hands in a 52 cards decks are the following. (ty google:))
hand number Probability
straight flush 41,584 .00031
4-of-a-kind 224,848 .0017
full house 3,473,184 .026
flush 4,047,644 .030
straight 6,180,020 .046
3-of-a-kind 6,461,620 .048
two pairs 31,433,400 .235
pair 58,627,800 .438
high card 23,294,460 .174
Does someone know what they are with a 36 cards deck ?
I mean if:
- the deck is 36 cards 6,7,8,9,T,J,Q,K,A and 4 suits heart diamond, spade and clubs
- I take 7 cards of the deck
- out of these 7 what is the probability for each poker hands (5 cards)
- where here A,6,7,8,9 is the lowest straight possible and T,J,Q,K,A is the highest straight possible
Thank you for your help,
Pokerguy
My first post here, so first thing first, congrats to the wizard for great site, I love the odds :)!
I'm hoping to find some help here as I don't manage to calculate myself following probabilities....
The number and probabilities for holdem hands in a 52 cards decks are the following. (ty google:))
hand number Probability
straight flush 41,584 .00031
4-of-a-kind 224,848 .0017
full house 3,473,184 .026
flush 4,047,644 .030
straight 6,180,020 .046
3-of-a-kind 6,461,620 .048
two pairs 31,433,400 .235
pair 58,627,800 .438
high card 23,294,460 .174
Does someone know what they are with a 36 cards deck ?
I mean if:
- the deck is 36 cards 6,7,8,9,T,J,Q,K,A and 4 suits heart diamond, spade and clubs
- I take 7 cards of the deck
- out of these 7 what is the probability for each poker hands (5 cards)
- where here A,6,7,8,9 is the lowest straight possible and T,J,Q,K,A is the highest straight possible
Thank you for your help,
Pokerguy
July 10th, 2015 at 8:24:47 AM
permalink
Sounds like you are referring to Six Plus Hold' em, a game popular in Macau and elsewhere.
I can't tell you the exact probabilities, but in this game, a flush beats a full house, and three of a kind beats a straight.
I can't tell you the exact probabilities, but in this game, a flush beats a full house, and three of a kind beats a straight.
July 10th, 2015 at 10:21:14 AM
permalink
A game in which A,6,7,8,9 is a straight should offend anyone's poker sensibilities.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice."
-- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
July 10th, 2015 at 11:27:59 AM
permalink
Quote: MathExtremistA game in which A,6,7,8,9 is a straight should offend anyone's poker sensibilities.
Got my attention. lol...
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
July 11th, 2015 at 7:53:05 AM
permalink
I'll do a couple now.
N(flush) = 4*[C(9,5)*C(27,2) + C(9,6)*27 + C(9,7)] = 46530
P(flush) = 46530 / C(36,7) = 47/8432 =~ 0.5574%
N(boat) = 9*8 * C(4,3)*C(4,2)*C(28,2) = 653184
P =~ 7.82%, about 14x as frequent as a flush which is why it's worth less.
N(flush) = 4*[C(9,5)*C(27,2) + C(9,6)*27 + C(9,7)] = 46530
P(flush) = 46530 / C(36,7) = 47/8432 =~ 0.5574%
N(boat) = 9*8 * C(4,3)*C(4,2)*C(28,2) = 653184
P =~ 7.82%, about 14x as frequent as a flush which is why it's worth less.
July 12th, 2015 at 2:59:12 AM
permalink
Hi Almondbread,
Thx for your stats even if now I'm even more confused that before. :)
Below is what I have for full house(boat) and flush....you'll see my results are not quite same as yours. :)
I'm really not sure who is right or wrong...that's why I'm hoping to find some input here.
N(Flush) = (4*(C(9,7)-(4+7+10))+(4*(C(9,6)-(5+14))*27)+(4*(C(9,5)-6)*C(27,2))=175560
P(Flush) = 175560 / C(36,7)) = 175560 / 8347680 = 2.103%
N(Full house) = (C(9,2)*C(4,3)*C(4,3)*28)+(9*C(8,2)*C(4,3)*C(4,2)*C(4,2))+(9*8*C(7,2)*C(4,3)*C(4,2)*4*4)= 633024
P (Full house) = 633024 / (C(36,7) = 633024 / 8347680 = 7 .583%
Still explains why Full house is worth less :)
Hope someone can help here. :)
Thx for your stats even if now I'm even more confused that before. :)
Below is what I have for full house(boat) and flush....you'll see my results are not quite same as yours. :)
I'm really not sure who is right or wrong...that's why I'm hoping to find some input here.
N(Flush) = (4*(C(9,7)-(4+7+10))+(4*(C(9,6)-(5+14))*27)+(4*(C(9,5)-6)*C(27,2))=175560
P(Flush) = 175560 / C(36,7)) = 175560 / 8347680 = 2.103%
N(Full house) = (C(9,2)*C(4,3)*C(4,3)*28)+(9*C(8,2)*C(4,3)*C(4,2)*C(4,2))+(9*8*C(7,2)*C(4,3)*C(4,2)*4*4)= 633024
P (Full house) = 633024 / (C(36,7) = 633024 / 8347680 = 7 .583%
Still explains why Full house is worth less :)
Hope someone can help here. :)
July 12th, 2015 at 11:46:39 PM
permalink
Sorry, both of my stats are wrong. For the flushes I forgot to subtract straight-flushes. For the boats I double-counted the cases of trips+twopair and I forgot to count the cases of double-trips.
N(straight flush) = 4*[C(31,2) + 5*C(30,2)] = 10560
P = 2/1581
N(flush) = 46530 - 10560 = 35970
P =~ 0.4309 %
N(boat) = 653184 - 3*C(9,3)*C(4,3)*C(4,2)^2 + C(9,2)*28*C(4,3)^2 = 633024
Since we still disagree on the flushes, I'll look at it again tomorrow.
Edit: In your flush calculation, where does 4+7+10 come from, and 5+14 and 6?
N(straight flush) = 4*[C(31,2) + 5*C(30,2)] = 10560
P = 2/1581
N(flush) = 46530 - 10560 = 35970
P =~ 0.4309 %
N(boat) = 653184 - 3*C(9,3)*C(4,3)*C(4,2)^2 + C(9,2)*28*C(4,3)^2 = 633024
Since we still disagree on the flushes, I'll look at it again tomorrow.
Edit: In your flush calculation, where does 4+7+10 come from, and 5+14 and 6?
July 13th, 2015 at 12:55:39 AM
permalink
I calculate the following:
My analysis assumed that standard poker hand ranking applies. For example, 89TJQQQ is a Straight, not Three of a Kind.
Results were calculated by writing a program which iterated through all combin(36,7) hands and determined the best 5-card hand.
Best 5-Card Hand | Combinations | Probability |
---|---|---|
Royal Flush | 1,860 | 0.000223 |
Straight Flush | 8,700 | 0.001042 |
Four of a Kind | 44,640 | 0.005348 |
Full House | 633,024 | 0.075832 |
Flush | 175,560 | 0.021031 |
Straight | 1,169,940 | 0.140152 |
Three of a Kind | 607,200 | 0.072739 |
Two Pair | 3,157,056 | 0.378196 |
One Pair | 2,316,600 | 0.277514 |
High Card | 233,100 | 0.027924 |
Totals | 8,347,680 | 1.000000 |
My analysis assumed that standard poker hand ranking applies. For example, 89TJQQQ is a Straight, not Three of a Kind.
Results were calculated by writing a program which iterated through all combin(36,7) hands and determined the best 5-card hand.
July 13th, 2015 at 1:08:04 AM
permalink
Oh, for my flushes I wrote 4*[...] but in my calculator I forgot the 4 so my result was off by a factor of about 4. Now that I typed it correctly (and subtracted straight flushes), I too get an answer of 175560 combos.
July 13th, 2015 at 5:44:44 AM
permalink
Thank you JB for that.
I'm having a hard time to accept that there are more combinations to make a full house than to make three of kind.
It's certainly due to what you're explaining about standard poker hand ranking applies where 89TJQQQ is a Straight and not Three of a Kind. It's really not intuitive at all. :)
I'm having a hard time to accept that there are more combinations to make a full house than to make three of kind.
It's certainly due to what you're explaining about standard poker hand ranking applies where 89TJQQQ is a Straight and not Three of a Kind. It's really not intuitive at all. :)
July 13th, 2015 at 1:39:50 PM
permalink
Quote: pokerguyI'm having a hard time to accept that there are more combinations to make a full house than to make three of kind.
Keep in mind that there are only 9 ranks, and you're using 7 cards to make a 5-card hand. When 3 of the 7 cards are the same rank, it is much more likely that the remaining 4 cards will contain a pair.
July 13th, 2015 at 2:39:58 PM
permalink
On a recent theme, this deck could be the basis for several funky bar bets. Even money that 7 cards will show 2 pair vs. 1 pair, etc.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice."
-- Girolamo Cardano, 1563