I would not change anything.
What will kill this game is that Pai Gow Poker in WA is such a good game--the small local casinos often deal no-commission PGP, which knocks the house edge down to just over 1%. Also, I haven't examined your strategy for 3CBJ in detail, but it seems that a novice could nake significant strategy errors--which would increase the house edge even further.
This game will die after its novelty value wears off.
Quote: mkl654321With almost a 3 1/2 percent house edge on the base game, it will never fly--2.5 percent is about right for table games
Hmmm ... the three most successful proprietary games ...
- Caribbean Stud -- 5.22%
- Let it Ride -- 3.51%
- Three Card Poker -- 3.37%
Quote: mkl654321What will kill this game is that Pai Gow Poker in WA is such a good game
So Pai Gow is the reason NO other games have succeeded in WA? FYI, Pai Gow is a public domain game.
Spanish 21 is the proprietary game that has dominated the WA market for years.
The dirt is wet today, no watering needed --
--Dorothy
The basic strategy is such that the average gambler would not feel dominated by the other players upon sitting down.
There are multiple poker tables and chances are that few people are down to their last $100 and would buy into the tournament for the chance to make it all back. You would even have people coming from downstairs to play so I can imagine that the table would fill up pretty fast.
Maybe the game is $100+$10 with a chance to win $800...I'd play it.
Quote: WizardHere is a preview of my new page on Three Card Blackjack. I welcome comments, questions, and corrections.
One minor correction: xxx Should be other, or loser, or list txx ttx ttt seperately. Also, are there any hands that you would raise/fold based on their composition? Like 888 vs 2?
Is insurance offered if the dealer is showing an ace?
If the dealer is holding an ace, then the probability that one of the other two cards is a face card (so that the dealer has blackjack) isQuote: DJTeddyBearIs insurance offered if the dealer is showing an ace?
p = 1 - (35/51)*(34/50) = 0.533.
Since this is greater than 1/2, insurance would have to pay less than 1-to-1. One could have "anti-insurance," I suppose.
--Dorothy
Quote: DorothyGaleIf the dealer is holding an ace, then the probability that one of the other two cards is a face card (so that the dealer has blackjack) is
p = 1 - (35/51)*(34/50) = 0.533.
Since this is greater than 1/2, insurance would have to pay less than 1-to-1. One could have "anti-insurance," I suppose.
--Dorothy
A very astute observation, Dorothy. It can be a new bet. I assume the vendor is reading here...
Even a Kansas ditsy can reason mathematically when the scarecrow stops by.Quote: PaigowdanA very astute observation, Dorothy.
Yes, then the bet can be just as successful as "insurance" is to blackjack ...Quote:It can be a new bet.
--Dorothy
Quote: DorothyGaleHmmm ... the three most successful proprietary games ...
- Caribbean Stud -- 5.22%
- Let it Ride -- 3.51%
- Three Card Poker -- 3.37%
So Pai Gow is the reason NO other games have succeeded in WA? FYI, Pai Gow is a public domain game.
Spanish 21 is the proprietary game that has dominated the WA market for years.
The dirt is wet today, no watering needed --
--Dorothy
In point of fact, the three games you mentioned are shrinking in popularity. Pai Gow Poker and Hold Em derivatives have taken a bite out of their market share. Spanish 21 isn't all that popular, though I see it more in the Injun casinos than the smaller in-town joints (the two markets are a lot different).
The reason Pai Gow Poker is so popular in the small in-town casinos is the very low house edge, with the no-commission rule. However, the places that deal PGP also usually deal one or more of the carny games you mentioned, as well as Spanish 21. I wouldn't call Spanish 21 "dominant", though.
The house edge numbers you mention are a large part of the reason that those games aren't all that popular. The players just don't last long enough with that kind of disadvantage.
A bit of humility in the presence of bona fide experts is in order, don't you think?Quote: mkl654321In point of fact
--Dorothy
Quote: DorothyGaleA bit of humility in the presence of bona fide experts is in order, don't you think?
--Dorothy
If this is your way of saying that I shouldn't disagree with you, I must point out that I am, myself, a "bona fide expert" in many aspects of gambling, by virtue of experience in the trenches over the course of twenty-plus years.
In any case, my assertion about the optimal house percentage for table games isn't of my own origin. Various persons have articulated that sentiment, including the CEO of Shuffle Master (whose name I can't recall), Kenny Uston of blackjack fame, and Gutboy Barrelhouse, the CEO of Harrah's.
Quote: mipletxxx Should be other, or loser, or list txx ttx ttt seperately. Also, are there any hands that you would raise/fold based on their composition? Like 888 vs 2?
Thanks, I changed "xxx" to "no aces." I didn't check every single card compositions when I created that strategy chart. It is an overall average for each total. I see from the expected value table, there are no situations close to -1.0, so I doubt there would be any exceptions.
Quote: DJTeddyBearIs insurance offered if the dealer is showing an ace?
No.