I had a quick question - is house edge for blackjack calculated based on total-basic strategy, composition-based basic strategy, or something else entirely?
Recently I have been using the Wizard of Odds blackjack hand calculator which has been super useful in teaching myself some composition-based basic strategy. If anyone wants I can details some of my more "interesting" findings (note: interesting is subjective) for others to use. I was wondering if the code for this, or a similar program is available online? I want to adjust it for other games such as Zappit or Spanish 21, and while I can code this myself I don't want to reinvent the wheel if someone already has made something very similar.
I think Spanish 21 could have particularly lucrative compositional-based basic strategy, considering that you win with six cards which adds another element to consider that total-based basic strategy might not be able to sufficiently take advantage of. Let me know what you think.
Spanish 21 is a different story and just because of the bonus hands. It is significant in the game. But the most important of the special Spanish 21 rules is the automatic win on 21.
I do not care if it is all very marginal. I'm in this for the math, not to save 76¢ on average for every million dollars I gamble :D
Quote: harrisGood evening everyone!
I had a quick question - is house edge for blackjack calculated based on total-basic strategy, composition-based basic strategy, or something else entirely?
Recently I have been using the Wizard of Odds blackjack hand calculator which has been super useful in teaching myself some composition-based basic strategy. If anyone wants I can details some of my more "interesting" findings (note: interesting is subjective) for others to use. I was wondering if the code for this, or a similar program is available online? I want to adjust it for other games such as Zappit or Spanish 21, and while I can code this myself I don't want to reinvent the wheel if someone already has made something very similar.
I think Spanish 21 could have particularly lucrative compositional-based basic strategy, considering that you win with six cards which adds another element to consider that total-based basic strategy might not be able to sufficiently take advantage of. Let me know what you think.
link to original post
harris,
Here is a useful post for you:
Quote: MentalThere is a really great open source BJ evaluator already available on github courtesy of Eric Farmer: https://github.com/possibly-wrong/blackjack
This has been tested by a number of experts and does finite deck calculations for a variety of rules. I found the code easy to understand and modify.
link to original post
I too have frequently used Eric's programs.
Dog Hand
Quote: harrisThere are many other situations for composition dependent strategy.
I do not care if it is all very marginal. I'm in this for the math, not to save 76¢ on average for every million dollars I gamble :D
link to original post
We do not want “marginal” problems; we want “substantial” to say the least. However, your interest in Spanish 21 is well justified because you have demonstrated tremendous math skills. I’ve asked this question a couple of times here, but nobody hasn’t shown any interest. Here it is.
Consider a 6-deck S-17 Spanish 21 game. The multiple cards 21 bonus pay is:
A five-card 21 pays 3:2;
A six-card 21 pays 2:1;
A seven or more-cards 21 pays 3:1.
Wizard shows that the basic strategy for a three or more-cards 11 vs 10 is Hit if Double-down voids these bonus pays. What is the correct strategy if these bonuses are still paid even after Double-down?
Based on some quick calculations I can say that Doubling would be better at any card number 11 vs 10. This could have also been a logic problem instead of using calculations :D I hope I did not misunderstand your question.
Quote: harrisI'm assuming based on your explanation: if you bet $100, got a five-card 11, and doubled it (to $200) and got 21, you would get paid 2:1 ($400).
link to original post
This is correct. For four-card, five-card, and more-card hands, it’s clear the correct strategy is Double. However, for a three-card 11 v 10, it’s not so clear. Let me use this hand as an example:
For the hand 3,6,2 v 10, should I Hit or Double? If I Double, I will lose any possible bonus payouts in the future, because I cannot Hit anymore after a Double. If I Hit, I will lose the opportunity to Double. What’s your call?
I'm just going to guess you should hit in this case based on vibes (someone else can calculate it) but it might depend on whether or not "double down rescue" is offered.