daypay
daypay
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Jan 31, 2023
Thanked by
Mission146
January 31st, 2023 at 11:38:52 AM permalink
Thank you to all of vegas of wizard users. I was got lots of useful information from this forum.
And sorry about my wreck of English. I'm not native.

Anyway. As I know, I can measure range of profit and loss using variance.

Assume below condition.

Bet same amount of money = unit
number of play hands = hands
ignore house edge
No side bet.
Follow basic rule

At a rough level. Sqrt (hands)*1.21*unit is range of profit and loss.

So if I play 100 hands. I will suffer 12.1 units up and down.

And standard Normal Distribution chart show over 20 units of profit and loss probability under 10%.

But, my game result history show. Over 20 units volatility about 20~25%.

Sample size, about 20k played hands.
Additionally, I play 5 hands against one dealer's hand.

I mean, 1unit $20 is mean my bet $4 each hole.

That makes me confuse.

So, question Is my volatility formula is right? Or something wrong.

If I'm misses anything to measure risk. Please let me know.

Thank you.
Ace2
Ace2
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 2706
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
Thanked by
Mission146daypayMichaelBluejay
January 31st, 2023 at 11:55:27 AM permalink
SD for blackjack is more like 1.15

Assuming house edge of 0.5% you’d expect a win or loss above 11.5 units about one in three sessions. Session length 100 hands
It’s all about making that GTA
Mission146
Mission146
  • Threads: 142
  • Posts: 16832
Joined: May 15, 2012
Thanked by
daypayDieter
January 31st, 2023 at 11:56:28 AM permalink
Quote: daypay

Thank you to all of vegas of wizard users. I was got lots of useful information from this forum.
And sorry about my wreck of English. I'm not native.

Anyway. As I know, I can measure range of profit and loss using variance.

Assume below condition.

Bet same amount of money = unit
number of play hands = hands
ignore house edge
No side bet.
Follow basic rule

At a rough level. Sqrt (hands)*1.21*unit is range of profit and loss.

So if I play 100 hands. I will suffer 12.1 units up and down.

And standard Normal Distribution chart show over 20 units of profit and loss probability under 10%.

But, my game result history show. Over 20 units volatility about 20~25%.

Sample size, about 20k played hands.
Additionally, I play 5 hands against one dealer's hand.

I mean, 1unit $20 is mean my bet $4 each hole.

That makes me confuse.

So, question Is my volatility formula is right? Or something wrong.

If I'm misses anything to measure risk. Please let me know.

Thank you.
link to original post



First, Blackjack is not really my strong suit.

Second, it's very possible that I misunderstood your post.

That said, I don't know what basis you are using to calculate what you're doing, in terms of variance/SD. 1,000 initial deals playing five-handed at $4/hand is going to have more variance than 5,000 initial deals playing one-handed at $4/hand because so much of it comes down to the dealer's final hand.

Anyway, perhaps I did misunderstand what you're asking. If I didn't, then it seems like you're using the SD on $20 as if you were betting $20 playing one-handed, possibly.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/gripes/11182-pet-peeves/120/#post815219
daypay
daypay
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Jan 31, 2023
Thanked by
Mission146
January 31st, 2023 at 12:11:16 PM permalink
Thank you.
There was a slight error in the SD I used, but I am glad that the calculation formula itself is not wrong.
Then, let's think that the sample size is small, so the variability is measured larger than the theory
daypay
daypay
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Jan 31, 2023
Thanked by
Mission146
January 31st, 2023 at 12:20:45 PM permalink
My English is not good enough.
There was a lack of accurate explanation. Nevertheless, thank you for your consideration to give me the best answer.

My question was whether the expected profit and loss calculation that I used to play blackjack was correct.

Thanks to Ace2 who replied above, I could see that the calculation method was not very different.

Thank you for taking the time to answer me again.
Ace2
Ace2
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 2706
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
Thanked by
Mission146
January 31st, 2023 at 12:31:34 PM permalink
Quote: daypay

Thank you.
There was a slight error in the SD I used, but I am glad that the calculation formula itself is not wrong.
Then, let's think that the sample size is small, so the variability is measured larger than the theory
link to original post

Nope. If you played 3000 sessions (100 hands per session), about 1000 of them would fall outside of one SD
It’s all about making that GTA
Romes
Romes
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 5608
Joined: Jul 22, 2014
Thanked by
DieterMission146
February 1st, 2023 at 5:30:32 PM permalink
daypay, welcome to the forums! As mentioned by others the variance is "around" 1.15... I say "around" because the exact rules of the game effect the basic strategy (yes there is different basic strategy pending the rules of the game) which in turn effect the variance.

Also, you mentioned you're playing 5 hands against the dealer 1 hand, thus you're introducing co-variance of each of the hands... because while they're independently played and payed from one another, the cards drawn on each effect the your hands at the table. An obviously easy example of this would be if you played 5 hands in a single deck game and your first 4 hands got aces (lucky you)... so what's the odds of getting a blackjack on your last hand? I believe Wong discusses co-variance in enough detail in his book Professional Blackjack.

With your specific situation in mind, I would actually point you towards software like CVCX. With this software you can input your exact game conditions (or any other game you come across) and it will give you more information than you'll know what to do with up front... as well as the variance/etc.

If you check some of my blackjack posts from probably 5+ years ago you'll see I talk a lot about EV's, SD's, etc, etc.

Lastly, there are 3 articles on this website that go pretty in depth ("A to Z") with blackjack in reference to card counting. You did not specify much interest in counting with your problem above, but this goes in to a bit more of the frequencies and math behind so maybe it can give you some direction with your current situation. =)

https://wizardofvegas.com/articles/A-to-Z-Counting-Cards-in-Blackjack/
Playing it correctly means you've already won.
Ace2
Ace2
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 2706
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
Thanked by
Mission146
February 1st, 2023 at 8:16:05 PM permalink
SD is around 1.15. Variance is around 1.32

As long as you’re playing basic strategy in a 3:2 game, rule variants will have a negligible effect on that

Assume 1/2 percent edge, don’t fuss over tiny playing adjustments for rule variations, and this will be accurate within $5 per hour of play as a $100 bettor on the strip. No need to split hairs over a few bucks
Last edited by: Ace2 on Feb 1, 2023
It’s all about making that GTA
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 4718
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
Thanked by
Mission146
February 2nd, 2023 at 8:16:26 AM permalink
Quote: Ace2

SD is around 1.15. Variance is around 1.32

As long as you’re playing basic strategy in a 3:2 game, rule variants will have a negligible effect on that

Assume 1/2 percent edge, don’t fuss over tiny playing adjustments for rule variations, and this will be accurate within $5 per hour of play as a $100 bettor on the strip. No need to split hairs over a few bucks
link to original post




You didn’t address Covariance on playing five hands.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 566
Joined: May 14, 2021
Thanked by
Mission146
February 2nd, 2023 at 11:05:27 AM permalink
Quote: unJon

Quote: Ace2

SD is around 1.15. Variance is around 1.32

As long as you’re playing basic strategy in a 3:2 game, rule variants will have a negligible effect on that

Assume 1/2 percent edge, don’t fuss over tiny playing adjustments for rule variations, and this will be accurate within $5 per hour of play as a $100 bettor on the strip. No need to split hairs over a few bucks
link to original post




You didn’t address Covariance on playing five hands.
link to original post


The covariance problem in blackjack is actually a dealer-blackjack problem, mostly I believe. When the dealer has a blackjack hand, you will lose both two-hand hands simultaneously. If it is a 3:2 blackjack game, this covariance value will be significant; however, if it is a 6:5, the covariance will be negligible. I think.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 11316
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
Thanked by
Mission146
February 2nd, 2023 at 6:58:07 PM permalink
Quote: aceside

Quote: unJon

Quote: Ace2

SD is around 1.15. Variance is around 1.32

As long as you’re playing basic strategy in a 3:2 game, rule variants will have a negligible effect on that

Assume 1/2 percent edge, don’t fuss over tiny playing adjustments for rule variations, and this will be accurate within $5 per hour of play as a $100 bettor on the strip. No need to split hairs over a few bucks
link to original post




You didn’t address Covariance on playing five hands.
link to original post


The covariance problem in blackjack is actually a dealer-blackjack problem, mostly I believe. When the dealer has a blackjack hand, you will lose both two-hand hands simultaneously. If it is a 3:2 blackjack game, this covariance value will be significant; however, if it is a 6:5, the covariance will be negligible. I think.
link to original post



No, lots of co variance when dealer busts, or draws to 21 from a 6, or…. lots of dealer hands…. Certainly NOT just against blackjacks
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 566
Joined: May 14, 2021
Thanked by
Mission146
February 2nd, 2023 at 10:15:30 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Quote: aceside

Quote: unJon

Quote: Ace2

SD is around 1.15. Variance is around 1.32

As long as you’re playing basic strategy in a 3:2 game, rule variants will have a negligible effect on that

Assume 1/2 percent edge, don’t fuss over tiny playing adjustments for rule variations, and this will be accurate within $5 per hour of play as a $100 bettor on the strip. No need to split hairs over a few bucks
link to original post




You didn’t address Covariance on playing five hands.
link to original post


The covariance problem in blackjack is actually a dealer-blackjack problem, mostly I believe. When the dealer has a blackjack hand, you will lose both two-hand hands simultaneously. If it is a 3:2 blackjack game, this covariance value will be significant; however, if it is a 6:5, the covariance will be negligible. I think.
link to original post



No, lots of co variance when dealer busts, or draws to 21 from a 6, or…. lots of dealer hands…. Certainly NOT just against blackjacks
link to original post


Maybe you are right, but I posted this specifically to seek comparison of the covariance values between a 3:2 and a 6:5 blackjack games.
  • Jump to: