theoriemeister
theoriemeister
Joined: Jul 4, 2015
  • Threads: 26
  • Posts: 130
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 12th, 2021 at 7:13:04 PM permalink
I've seem to recall that when the count is good enough, one's EV can be increased by spreading to two hands, although doing so reduces variances, both good and bad, yes? So, then does spreading to 3 or 4 hands further reduce variance?
Then it just dawned on me that any player joining the table should have the same effect on variance as if I were to spread to an additional hand. So does it follow that the more players at the table, the greater that variance will be reduced?
ars longa vita brevis
Mission146
Mission146
Joined: May 15, 2012
  • Threads: 132
  • Posts: 15024
Thanks for this post from:
MrCasinoGames
July 12th, 2021 at 7:17:53 PM permalink
No, because they are not playing with your money.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/gripes/11182-pet-peeves/120/#post815219
tyler498
tyler498
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 155
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146MrCasinoGames
July 12th, 2021 at 7:23:50 PM permalink
Quote: theoriemeister

I've seem to recall that when the count is good enough, one's EV can be increased by spreading to two hands, although doing so reduces variances, both good and bad, yes? So, then does spreading to 3 or 4 hands further reduce variance?
Then it just dawned on me that any player joining the table should have the same effect on variance as if I were to spread to an additional hand. So does it follow that the more players at the table, the greater that variance will be reduced?



Playing 2 hands and dividing your big bet over the 2 reduces variance if you compare it to aggregating the whole bet on one hand.
Think of it as not putting all your eggs in 1 hand but 2 instead.

Other players do not reduce or increase your variance since you take no part in their wins/losses.
But they do eat up a share of the good cards, which is one other reason to split to 2 hands when the count is positive and there are other players, to take a larger share of the good cards. If you are playing heads-up (alone), it is actually slightly better to stick to 1 hand.

Keep in mind 2 hands at once is not the same variance as playing a single hand twice since the dealer gets the same hand.
I recommend you read this thoroughly:
https://wizardofodds.com/games/blackjack/variance/
moses
moses
Joined: Sep 23, 2013
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 507
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 12th, 2021 at 8:49:12 PM permalink
Tyler writes: If you are playing heads-up (alone), it is actually slightly better to stick to 1 hand.

Why? Surely you dont mean with a deck composition worthy of large bets.
tyler498
tyler498
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 155
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 12th, 2021 at 10:29:28 PM permalink
Quote: moses

Tyler writes: If you are playing heads-up (alone), it is actually slightly better to stick to 1 hand.

Why? Surely you dont mean with a deck composition worthy of large bets.



I do, 1 hand is the best way to play heads-up.

I do not remember the exact numbers, but generally speaking, between putting your max bet on one hand or splitting to 2 hands with let's say 60% or 70% of your max bet each (whatever works out to your full Kelly, considering the variance of 2 hands). Then for the same variance, you consume more cards per round (1 player + 1 dealer becomes 2 player + 1 dealer) and you have more money out. It comes out that it is slightly better to play more rounds of 1 hand on a good count than less rounds with 2 hands.

Obviously, if you know the cut card is coming and it's about to be the last hand, splitting to 2 is better.

Apologies that I do not remember the actual quote. Maybe someone with a better memory can pitch in here.
tyler498
tyler498
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 155
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 12th, 2021 at 10:40:36 PM permalink
Quote: moses

Tyler writes: If you are playing heads-up (alone), it is actually slightly better to stick to 1 hand.

Why? Surely you don't mean with a deck composition worthy of large bets.



That being said, the difference is very small and shouldn't be the main deciding factor.

I'd say if you're wondering whether to split to 2 or not, pros and cons are 2 hands plays a bit faster, so you can use up the good cards before someone jumps in or you get noticed, and 1 hand draws less attention in some places.
moses
moses
Joined: Sep 23, 2013
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 507
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 13th, 2021 at 6:10:12 AM permalink
My rule of thumb. 1 hand for minimum bets. 1 hand for high TC is a threshold. 2 hands for high TC is an advantage. Dont take advantage too much of your advantage. 3 hands is an escort .😲
billryan
billryan
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
  • Threads: 202
  • Posts: 12053
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 13th, 2021 at 6:15:34 AM permalink
I believe the Grifters Gambit calls for playing three small hands and reverting to a single large hand when the count calls for it.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
moses
moses
Joined: Sep 23, 2013
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 507
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 13th, 2021 at 6:59:24 AM permalink
The majority of higher TC's worthy of large bets occur after card 20 cards are played in single deck. Thus conventional wisdom often leads to watching quality bet opportunities get shuffled away.
Last edited by: moses on Jul 13, 2021
tyler498
tyler498
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 155
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
July 13th, 2021 at 8:12:31 AM permalink
Quote: billryan

I believe the Grifters Gambit calls for playing three small hands and reverting to a single large hand when the count calls for it.


Yes when able to play multiple hands for the minimum. Most places I've seen require 2X min bet for 2 hands

  • Jump to: