I've Beaten Baccarat and published the code in a book on Amazon

Quote: ThatDonGuy

Quote: DogHand

Grand Unified Theory?

Dog Hand
link to original post

I found the reference to it - it stands for "Great Universal Theory."

Apparently, it was first mentioned around 2008 by someone named, or going by the name, "winkel."
The quick version appears to be, in roulette, count how many of the 37 numbers have come up N times and how many have come up more than N times, for pretty much any non-negative integer N; when the difference is 0 or 1, you bet all of the numbers that have appeared N times.

If you watch the YouTube videos listed near the start of this thread (look at the two "Live Play Apps" videos here), you will see something similar, although they are counting something slightly different.

However, even if the theory did hold up in roulette, it would not hold up in baccarat, as the Law of the Third (which, itself, is incorrect) only applies when each of the possible results has an equal chance of happening, which is not true with the results he is tracking in baccarat. Either that, or the probability of a tied hand is always 1/19 (you might want to check out the Wizard's baccarat page to see how accurate that one is).
link to original post

Quote: ThatDonGuy

Quote: DogHand

Grand Unified Theory?

Dog Hand
link to original post

I found the reference to it - it stands for "Great Universal Theory."

Apparently, it was first mentioned around 2008 by someone named, or going by the name, "winkel."

link to original post

Quote: EvenBob

Quote: ThatDonGuy

Quote: DogHand

Grand Unified Theory?

Dog Hand
link to original post

I found the reference to it - it stands for "Great Universal Theory."

Apparently, it was first mentioned around 2008 by someone named, or going by the name, "winkel."

link to original post

Things like this always crack me up. The thing you want in a method or a system is consistency. That's what you're always looking for, that's your goal to win consistently. And none of these these things do that. To find consistency you have to stick with it and stick with it and stick with it and hone it down and hone it down until you finally get the Bare Bones and you might find consistency. And they always start off with the words "it's really quite simple" when in actuality it's the polar opposite of simple. I don't know who this Winkle is but I guarantee he doesn't get it.
link to original post

Quote: Mental

Quote: EvenBob

Quote: ThatDonGuy

Quote: DogHand

Grand Unified Theory?

Dog Hand
link to original post

I found the reference to it - it stands for "Great Universal Theory."

Apparently, it was first mentioned around 2008 by someone named, or going by the name, "winkel."

link to original post

Things like this always crack me up. The thing you want in a method or a system is consistency. That's what you're always looking for, that's your goal to win consistently. And none of these these things do that. To find consistency you have to stick with it and stick with it and stick with it and hone it down and hone it down until you finally get the Bare Bones and you might find consistency. And they always start off with the words "it's really quite simple" when in actuality it's the polar opposite of simple. I don't know who this Winkle is but I guarantee he doesn't get it.
link to original post

This begs the question of why anyone would want to create a system or method if they are so elusive. Your online casinos are offering you so much promo money that it would be hard not to be playing +EV every single day right from day 1. It seems a lot easier to just take all of the bonuses.

And why would consistency be the main thing if you are playing +EV? What is so bad about variance?
link to original post

Quote: EvenBob

I never take the bonuses or anything they offer, why would I. That just seems silly when I'm already plus EV every time I play. I want an extremely small footprint, that certainly doesn't include taking bonuses.
link to original post

Quote: TigerWu

I thought EB was only allowed to talk about Roulette in his own little thread?
link to original post

Quote: Mental

Quote: EvenBob

I never take the bonuses or anything they offer, why would I. That just seems silly when I'm already plus EV every time I play. I want an extremely small footprint, that certainly doesn't include taking bonuses.
link to original post

The online casinos in your state are begging you to take hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in bonus money, but you don't want to accept their charity. I can respect that. It is much better to be a roulette whisperer with a small footprint.
link to original post

Quote: EvenBob

You see the word roulette mentioned?
link to original post

Quote: TigerWu

Quote: EvenBob

You see the word roulette mentioned?
link to original post

Yes, I do. ThatDonGuy linked to Winkel's posts, specifically about roulette, in a roulette-specific forum. And you responded with a paragraph-long rant.
link to original post

Quote: EvenBob

Quote: TigerWu

Quote: EvenBob

You see the word roulette mentioned?
link to original post

Yes, I do. ThatDonGuy linked to Winkel's posts, specifically about roulette, in a roulette-specific forum. And you responded with a paragraph-long rant.
link to original post

But it's not about my method of play. I'm not banned from talking about gambling I can only talk about my specific method play in my thread. Quit trying so hard, not a good look.
link to original post

Quote: unJon

What’s the psychology of so many posters trying to enforce rules and complain for bans?
link to original post

Quote: unJon

What’s the psychology of so many posters trying to enforce rules and complain for bans?
link to original post