Thread Rating:

lilredrooster
lilredrooster
Joined: May 8, 2015
  • Threads: 175
  • Posts: 3615
June 14th, 2021 at 1:47:46 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66



Mastering Chess




the levels of chess masters are generally designated as follows:


2700+No formal title, but sometimes informally called "super grandmasters"[5]
2500–2700 most Grandmasters (GM)
2400–2500 most International Masters (IM) and some Grandmasters (GM)
2300–2400 most FIDE Masters (FM) and some International Masters (IM)
2200–2300 FIDE Candidate Masters (CM), most national masters (NM)
2000–2200 Candidate masters (CM)



he doesn't specifically identify himself as being one of these

so what does it mean if a person says he is "mastering chess"


your guess is as good as mine


my guess is it means very little or nothing at all


if a person was ranked among one of these high categories they would have designated themselves as such - not say they are "mastering chess"




prediction:


look for a follow up post where he now says he is a member of one of these categories





finding this in the post of person whose scribbles you doubt is like finding gold - you see the true colors clearly






*
𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳.........𝖤𝖽𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖠𝗅𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝖯𝗈𝖾
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
  • Threads: 47
  • Posts: 2112
June 14th, 2021 at 2:03:35 AM permalink
I'm like if I can't win a chess game in 7 moves, what's the point? I'd rather play Bingo.
darkoz
darkoz
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
  • Threads: 257
  • Posts: 8186
June 14th, 2021 at 3:16:27 AM permalink
Quote: MrV

Let's see ... the Wiz posits four possible scenarios, but I see no rational basis with any of them them for him to be muzzled and "strictly sworn to secrecy."

If he witnessed a large bankroll that's nothing new in sin city, and is in fact what the bettor claims to have, so no secrets there.

Similarly "luck happens:" variance is no secret.

Were he to conclude there was exaggeration or sloppy records there' woul be no need to be "strictly sworn to secrecy."

Does not compute.



It computes perfectly.

The Wizard observed an explainable advantage play that MDawg was utilizing.

Very early on after the Wizard observed MDawg playing I questioned why there aren't more AP's trying to understand his advantage and the Wizard made a post that he also didn't understand why. That post would have been within a week or two of the conclusion of the challenge for anyone who wants to go verify.

If the Wizard is wondering why more AP:s aren't searching for the advantage and he hasn't come out and said MDawg's methods are not an AP play (what is to be kept secret about someone who can't beat the house edge) then the only conclusion that does compute is MDawg uses an Advantage Play.

Ultimately MDawg has either lied about his winning or has lied about not being an Advantage Player. He has presented proof of winning to the Wizard and presented observational play that the Wizard cannot divulge and which the Wizard absolutely claims doesn't change his opinion on denting the house edge.

I think people are just upset someone who brags a lot might actually have something to brag about. It's human nature.

I get flack for bragging about my AP and in some weird twilight zone I also get flack for discussion of my setbacks. Perhaps it's because to have major setbacks one must also have major success first, I don't know.

I am certain there is more to the MDawg story than he is letting on. And whatever it is isn't what his naysayers expect.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 376
June 14th, 2021 at 3:51:47 AM permalink
Quote: darkoz

It computes perfectly.

The Wizard observed an explainable advantage play that MDawg was utilizing.

Very early on after the Wizard observed MDawg playing I questioned why there aren't more AP's trying to understand his advantage and the Wizard made a post that he also didn't understand why. That post would have been within a week or two of the conclusion of the challenge for anyone who wants to go verify.

If the Wizard is wondering why more AP:s aren't searching for the advantage and he hasn't come out and said MDawg's methods are not an AP play (what is to be kept secret about someone who can't beat the house edge) then the only conclusion that does compute is MDawg uses an Advantage Play.

Ultimately MDawg has either lied about his winning or has lied about not being an Advantage Player. He has presented proof of winning to the Wizard and presented observational play that the Wizard cannot divulge and which the Wizard absolutely claims doesn't change his opinion on denting the house edge.

I think people are just upset someone who brags a lot might actually have something to brag about. It's human nature.

I get flack for bragging about my AP and in some weird twilight zone I also get flack for discussion of my setbacks. Perhaps it's because to have major setbacks one must also have major success first, I don't know.

I am certain there is more to the MDawg story than he is letting on. And whatever it is isn't what his naysayers expect.



I must say darkoz, you certainly have rationalized out and made yourself feel good that what the Great MDawg is using is probably not for you or anyone else. I too am sworn to secrecy with my conversations with the Great MDawg and I would have to also agree with you, that I don't believe his advantaged play is for you as well!

Have a beautiful day. :)!

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Nonassumption, Nonguessing and Not Forrming Opinions of Others
I must tell you, its super to be here brother. I couldn't care less who wins or loses, I am getting paid every time I step through the door. It’s just wonderful to be in the circus.
lilredrooster
lilredrooster
Joined: May 8, 2015
  • Threads: 175
  • Posts: 3615
June 14th, 2021 at 4:05:39 AM permalink
..........................


constantly bragging on a gambling forum and then telling a couple of others that you have a secret that you won't reveal is not a good thing

gambling forums are all about sharing knowledge so everybody can learn which is what Mr. Wizard and others here do

what he is doing - if he has a winning secret - is causing distrust, disbelief and other bad feelings

if you have a reason to brag you need to share the method behind what you're bragging about or face a lot of negativity

if you asked a great football player how he became great he wouldn't tell you it's a secret - he would tell you he spent hours every day in the weight room and hours running wind sprints - or something else

the guy deserves all the negativity he receives and I don't believe he has a winning secret or anything else that he brags about

if Marcus Clark and Wellbush and a couple of others want to jump up and down about him like dizzy pre-teens at a Justin Bieber concert so be it

what a joke






and Dark Oz:


you're making cryptic remarks which are not helpful
you're implying or suggesting that you know what his "secret" is

if you have something to say you need to say it

otherwise your posts should be ignored



*
Last edited by: lilredrooster on Jun 14, 2021
𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳.........𝖤𝖽𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖠𝗅𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝖯𝗈𝖾
lilredrooster
lilredrooster
Joined: May 8, 2015
  • Threads: 175
  • Posts: 3615
June 14th, 2021 at 4:55:36 AM permalink
............................


on March 12 at 8:47 a.m. MDawg posted this in this thread:



Quote: MDawg




I have a system for predicting the ties. I bet them when I do, I usually win. 𝐎𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐢𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝟏𝟎𝟎%, but I will hit the majority of my tie bets.




imagine that...............a frank admission that he doesn't hit ties 100% of the time - such modesty

statistically ties come about 9.5% of the time or a little bit less often than one in 10 times

how brain dead does a person have to be to believe that?

believe it or not there are a few here who believe it





*
𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳.........𝖤𝖽𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖠𝗅𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝖯𝗈𝖾
Wellbush
Wellbush
Joined: Mar 23, 2021
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 432
June 14th, 2021 at 5:51:14 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

I did not say that 'damn' is not a profanity. I said that I would not impose a penalty on this occasion. I did not say 'minion' is an insult.

No. You voluntarily emerged in this thread, in this subforum for the mathematically challenged, where the normal rules of science, maths and nature do not apply.



From my angle, not only mathematically challenged but theoretically challenged as well! Wasn't it Warren Buffet who said if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it yourself?

So i'm waiting to hear a simple explanation for EV, and a simple explanation for Wellbush's Paradox!
Only gamble 'a little' for fun, or, if 'you know' you can win.
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
  • Threads: 47
  • Posts: 2112
June 14th, 2021 at 5:53:36 AM permalink
It's easy to win or lose more than the EV, but those results are affected by EV, because you're being shortchanged on every bet.
Wellbush
Wellbush
Joined: Mar 23, 2021
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 432
June 14th, 2021 at 5:56:12 AM permalink
Quote: mwalz9

Rule #6 violation?

I don't let my children say the "d" word?

should your children be exposed to this site? is the "d" word that bad for adults?
Only gamble 'a little' for fun, or, if 'you know' you can win.
Wellbush
Wellbush
Joined: Mar 23, 2021
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 432
June 14th, 2021 at 6:17:41 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I'm strictly sworn to secrecy about how mdawg plays. So, I will make a general statement, as follows.

No betting system can beat baccarat. Unless it relies on card counting, a betting system cannot even dent the house edge in baccarat. If a player claims to consistently beat the game straight up, without some form of advantage play, then I would assume one of the following to be the case:

  • The player has a very large bankroll compared to his winning goals and hasn't reached the "long term" yet.
  • The player has been, what most people would call, "lucky." I would say his overall results have are well on the right side of the bell curve, thus far.
  • The player is exaggerating.
  • The player is not keeping accurate records.


I have known plenty of recreational gamblers who always seem to come back from a casino trip with stories of winning. Said stories seem to grow with time. I'm not necessarily filing mdawg in that group. To be honest, I don't really care. I don't see why so many are so hot and bothered with him.



i'm surprised you consider MD's exploits meaningless! what do have to say re Wellbush's Paradox?
Last edited by: Wellbush on Jun 14, 2021
Only gamble 'a little' for fun, or, if 'you know' you can win.

  • Jump to: