Thread Rating:

SOOPOO
SOOPOO
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
  • Threads: 118
  • Posts: 9295
Thanks for this post from:
Forager
March 30th, 2020 at 7:23:20 AM permalink
Quote: Aussie

Itís embarrassing I agree. The guy is goaded non-stop by a group who appear to have been given carte blanche. Itís almost like this was the intended outcome.



Personally, I enjoyed my banter with MDawg. But if I was the owner of this site I would have banned him quite a while ago. Allowing someone to continually make outlandish claims not based in reality is certainly within MDawg's free speech rights. But not wanting to be the host of such pure BS is within the rights of the owners. And as the Wizard has said many times, if you don't like it don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Aussie, I hope you stay.
DeMango
DeMango
Joined: Feb 2, 2010
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2958
March 30th, 2020 at 8:43:29 AM permalink
Quote: Aussie

Itís embarrassing I agree. The guy is goaded non-stop by a group who appear to have been given carte blanche. Itís almost like this was the intended outcome.



That's exactly it, always the same group of bullies.
When a rock is thrown into a pack of dogs, the one that yells the loudest is the one who got hit.
onenickelmiracle
onenickelmiracle
Joined: Jan 26, 2012
  • Threads: 212
  • Posts: 8277
March 30th, 2020 at 8:51:55 AM permalink
We need the volatility, simply an egg during trying times isn't enough.
I am a robot.
DeMango
DeMango
Joined: Feb 2, 2010
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2958
March 30th, 2020 at 9:00:54 AM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Personally, I enjoyed my banter with MDawg. But if I was the owner of this site I would have banned him quite a while ago. Allowing someone to continually make outlandish claims not based in reality is certainly within MDawg's free speech rights. But not wanting to be the host of such pure BS is within the rights of the owners. And as the Wizard has said many times, if you don't like it don't let the door hit you on the way out.



Allowing a group of bullies to goad those they don't like is wrong. Many, including you, have enjoyed his posts. But to say "rights of the owners"? What do the real owners say? I understand, hearsay of course, that volume of visitors fluctuates based on the presence of Mdawg here. What do the real owners say?

A question arose the other day about the martingale suspension operation. Someone noted Mdawg never was given a three day suspension. So the current sentence given is part of a progression flawed from the start. We all know certain posters in the past received favorable suspensions not in line with these draconian measures.
When a rock is thrown into a pack of dogs, the one that yells the loudest is the one who got hit.
TDVegas
TDVegas
Joined: Oct 30, 2018
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 1186
March 30th, 2020 at 9:49:18 AM permalink
Heíll go back to gamblingforums.com during his 4 month hiatus.

Hopefully heís back on the tables by August.

He could be a long term winner. Doubtful...but the possibility exists even on a negative expectation game like baccarat. Canít prove it. Canít disprove it.

If his intention was to create a vlog (plog) here of some kind to document ďthe adventures of MDawgĒ....he was probably better off posting but not responding. A diary of sorts doesnít answer you back. You post your adventures. Thatís it. His troubles involved trying to argue it and not liking the responses on a forum that is kind of dedicated to mathematical veracity.

Just let it go and document the adventure. I donít think this was a guy posting his adventure for adventure sake. Seems it was more about getting affirmation or evolved into that.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
  • Threads: 118
  • Posts: 9295
Thanks for this post from:
Forager
March 30th, 2020 at 10:15:23 AM permalink
Quote: DeMango

Allowing a group of bullies to goad those they don't like is wrong. Many, including you, have enjoyed his posts. But to say "rights of the owners"? What do the real owners say? I understand, hearsay of course, that volume of visitors fluctuates based on the presence of Mdawg here. What do the real owners say?

A question arose the other day about the martingale suspension operation. Someone noted Mdawg never was given a three day suspension. So the current sentence given is part of a progression flawed from the start. We all know certain posters in the past received favorable suspensions not in line with these draconian measures.



I don't feel like I was bullying MDawg. Pointing out the absurdity of certain claims to me is not bullying.
"The real owners" have chosen to trust the judgment of their moderators, as they clearly do not want to monitor the minutia here. If the owners were unhappy with a moderator, these VOLUNTEERS would be gone.
Aussie
Aussie
Joined: Dec 29, 2009
  • Threads: 12
  • Posts: 415
Thanks for this post from:
MDawg
March 30th, 2020 at 1:43:47 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Personally, I enjoyed my banter with MDawg. But if I was the owner of this site I would have banned him quite a while ago. Allowing someone to continually make outlandish claims not based in reality is certainly within MDawg's free speech rights. But not wanting to be the host of such pure BS is within the rights of the owners. And as the Wizard has said many times, if you don't like it don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Aussie, I hope you stay.



The point you make is a deflection.

The owners of Internet forums can do whatever they like, ban whoever they like for whatever reason they like. Freedom of speech does not apply. There is no need for a set of rules other than as a guide to acceptable behaviour. So if he had have been banned from the start then thatís totally fine.

The problem arises when you choose to allegedly follow the rules rigidly but then selectively enforce them. And no one can honestly deny that is what happens. I mean, how did PokerGrinder get away with a 14 day suspension for the disgraceful, personal abuse that he hurled? His post looked eerily similar to another recent post that resulted in the poster being nuked.

Allowing other posters to clearly break the rules by goading MDawg non-stop until he slips up and breaks a rule himself is a disgrace. Pretending that you are just enforcing the rules is laughable. There is a line between banter and bullying. I donít believe you have crossed it but several have. Thatís obvious to any impartial observer.

No, I wonít be going. I donít post often but I enjoy reading about gambling and other peopleís experiences.
michael99000
michael99000
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 2112
Thanks for this post from:
Forager
March 30th, 2020 at 1:53:53 PM permalink
Quote: Aussie

The point you make is a deflection.

The owners of Internet forums can do whatever they like, ban whoever they like for whatever reason they like. Freedom of speech does not apply. There is no need for a set of rules other than as a guide to acceptable behaviour. So if he had have been banned from the start then thatís totally fine.

The problem arises when you choose to allegedly follow the rules rigidly but then selectively enforce them. And no one can honestly deny that is what happens. I mean, how did PokerGrinder get away with a 14 day suspension for the disgraceful, personal abuse that he hurled? His post looked eerily similar to another recent post that resulted in the poster being nuked.

Allowing other posters to clearly break the rules by goading MDawg non-stop until he slips up and breaks a rule himself is a disgrace. Pretending that you are just enforcing the rules is laughable. There is a line between banter and bullying. I donít believe you have crossed it but several have. Thatís obvious to any impartial observer.

No, I wonít be going. I donít post often but I enjoy reading reading about gambling and other peopleís experiences.



There are plenty of other boards catering to anyone who continually posts false, misleading , absurd nonsense. People with systems they claim can beat games where itís not possible , can post their stories there. People like you are free to let him know youíre a believer and cheer him on, reply all you want and inform him how impressed you are.

Maybe a site where mathematics and informed gambling are stressed , Is not the best place for that trash.

And besides, the game of baccarat has been around for about 250 years. Thereís probably thousands of very smart people whoíve tried to beat it and failed. Casinos deal it with very high limits and almost no heat at all because they are confident it cannot be beaten. But the mdawg has figured it out. So why even share that much info ? Just wipe out chip racks one casino at a time and keep it quiet.
Mendoza
Mendoza
Joined: Nov 29, 2019
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 42
March 30th, 2020 at 2:04:14 PM permalink
miguel I ask the mdawg favor he going help me

he much bigger man then you

now he gone you talk a lot trash but he here you afraid talk like that

?and now I say you should be suspend for insult to mdawg. Will any the one in charge come now to do?
michael99000
michael99000
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 2112
March 30th, 2020 at 2:08:59 PM permalink
Quote: Mendoza



now he gone you talk a lot trash but he here you afraid talk like that



I been saying the same thing for months amigo

  • Jump to: