Thread Rating:
this couldnt be another guy putting us on, could it?
I agree with this a hundred percentQuote: DMSCRYou will be driving a collection of Ferraris and have a bevy of knockout women by your side in no time flat. Definitely you will achieve this within eight months. Within four if you are really put your mind, effort and time. Also please when you reach that point come back to this thread and edit/"delete" your post. We really don't want this secret out. Hopefully you do so well the casinos don't put you on their hit list(s). You are really doing yourself a disfavor by revealing this to us. But thank you for your generosity and openness to share btw!
if this was the standard response everybody gave, I guarantee not very many people will be posting about they're bac systems.
just smile, agree and watch it quickly fizzle out.
Quote: FluxProSo I wanted to know what everyone thinks of this system First of all it's an 8 step Martingale 25 25 100 200 400 800 1600 You wait for either two players or two bankers in a row then bet on the third player/banker if it doesn't hit for example PPB then you bet that it hits banker on the fourth hand. Then you just start over waiting for two player/bankers in a row and betting on the third player/banker in a row. I think this method takes out all the choppy play and you're betting when it gets hot. I've been testing it out and I haven't lost a single shoe but I've only played 60 shoes. Wondering what everyone thinks of this system.
First of all I'm only seeing 7 steps. Unless your first step is something other than 25 or you meant to go to 3200.
1- 25
2- 25
3- 100
4- 200
5- 400
6- 800
7- 1600
Anyway, 7 or 8 really doesn't matter. I see on your second step that you don't gain you just break even but if you're playing banker you'll still be losing $1.25 in commission. Every step after 2 has you netting 50 but after commission on step 6 you net $10 ($800x.05=$40 comm.) and step 7 you actually lose $30 because your commission will be $80 so its actually worse than just betting your $25 bet. Now when you lose the whole progression (notice I said when, not if) you lose $3150 and after that happens it will take you (3150/25) 126 $25 bets to make that up. Idk how many units you're gaining out of a shoe but I expect its less than 30 or maybe right around if you have a good shoe.
Point is this will lose in the long run like the rest and guys here can show it over and over with math and simulations. Unless you know of a place that NEVER deals streaks longer than 5 or 6 your system is in trouble.
So your another who can see round corners?Quote: RSNever bet against the streak! Play the streak and ride it out -- that's where the money is. Everyone knows this.
To the original poster, what about the tax on a $1600 bet?
Quote: RashidSo your another who can see round corners?
To the original poster, what about the tax on a $1600 bet?
There is no tax form required for even money bets at table games.
Quote: AxelWolfI agree with this a hundred percent
if this was the standard response everybody gave, I guarantee not very many people will be posting about they're bac systems.
just smile, agree and watch it quickly fizzle out.
I am taking a deep offense of your comment because I was being genuinely serious. It was not meant as a joke at all. He really does have something that will make the casinos tremble. How dare you to discredit such fortified betting concept that will bring enormous wealth and financial independence to all those who dare such Herculean project. His approach contains the answers that will unlock the secrets of the universe and harness its potential powers!
???Quote: wudgedThere is no tax form required for even money bets at table games.
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Quote: Rashid???
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Oh why hello Egalite/Rolex-Watch! How are those recent drawdowns in Australia? I am sure you are quite used to them by now. Awaiting your annual big drawdown tilt gaining heart thread once again. Yeah please do keep us posted. Wouldn't be right if you just kept things between your members in your super duper secret private board.
Quote: Rashid???
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Okay, I'll ask: what's a "banker tax", and why would it generate a tax form?
I assume the other post was talking about how things work in the USA. A W-2G form (a form that indicates gambling winnings, that is sent to the IRS with a copy given to the player) is generated only in specific circumstances.
The only other time that a form of any sort might be generated is if there is a cash transaction of $10,000 or more, but that's not a "tax form"; it's for money laundering prevention purposes.
here is how it works.
Whenever I have a hot date, I am a player so I always bet player for the entire evening.
However, if the hot date asks me for money then I am a banker and start betting banker.
I always seem to bet banker more often which seems to correspond to the edge banker has so my system works.
Too bad I can't keep the money (those pesky hot women always seem to)
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: Rashid???
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Okay, I'll ask: what's a "banker tax", and why would it generate a tax form?
I assume the other post was talking about how things work in the USA. A W-2G form (a form that indicates gambling winnings, that is sent to the IRS with a copy given to the player) is generated only in specific circumstances.
The only other time that a form of any sort might be generated is if there is a cash transaction of $10,000 or more, but that's not a "tax form"; it's for money laundering prevention purposes.
He means the 5% taken by the house on a winning banker bet (aka commission), which break a pure Martingale, as the return isn't evens, but just under.
Quote: Rashid???
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Typically referred to as "commission" and not tax. Since you specified an explicit amount of $1600, (and left off the $800 step which would generate a $40 "tax" which is larger than the starting $25 wager,) I thought you were getting confused with a machine win of $1200 generating a tax form.
I am well aware what it is called, for those that frequent the tables, we simply call it "Banker or Casino" Tax....Quote: wudgedQuote: Rashid???
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Typically referred to as "commission" and not tax. Since you specified an explicit amount of $1600, (and left off the $800 step which would generate a $40 "tax" which is larger than the starting $25 wager,) I thought you were getting confused with a machine win of $1200 generating a tax form.
Quote: DMSCRQuote: Rashid???
Ermmm, Banker tax [sigh]
Oh why hello Egalite! How are those recent drawdowns in Australia? I am sure you are quite used to them by now. Awaiting your annual big drawdown tilt gaining heart thread once again. Yeah please do keep us posted. Wouldn't be right if you just kept things between your members in your super duper secret private board.
MODS
Aren't there rules on this forum regarding trolling???
Ya wanna know who the real troll is? Look inda mirror! LOL.
Quote: darkozI too have a winning Baccarat system.
here is how it works.
Whenever I have a hot date, I am a player so I always bet player for the entire evening.
However, if the hot date asks me for money then I am a banker and start betting banker.
I always seem to bet banker more often which seems to correspond to the edge banker has so my system works.
Too bad I can't keep the money (those pesky hot women always seem to)
The Pay to Play System.
The secret is out.
Quote: HozdaddyIf you bet with a streak you are only wrong once, when the streak ends.
Yeah, but you don't know when the streak is gonna end so if you're wrong too many times you'll be wiped out.
Quote: HozdaddyI am betting with the streak, not against it. I look at 2 as a repeat, 3 is a streak. If it doesn't go to 3 I lose. I've seen people play a martingale betting against a streak and get wiped out. If you bet against a streak you could be wrong 5 times.
Good day Sirs Daddy. How can help me with identity of streak? Seems to myself of bad nature when identying but others player much more then I when it happen? I won many steaks, don't be fueled. I should try to use repeats but not streaks I think? I do wish more upon successions, for us all. Mary Christmas!
Hi, and welcome to the forum.Quote: HozdaddyI am betting with the streak, not against it. I look at 2 as a repeat, 3 is a streak. If it doesn't go to 3 I lose. I've seen people play a martingale betting against a streak and get wiped out. If you bet against a streak you could be wrong 5 times.
As you'll soon discover, this forum's members are not tolerant of those who give any credence to betting random games based on previous unrelated outcomes.
If you bet with the streak you can still be wrong 5 times, just on 5 unrelated streaks.