A couple of questions about a play I recently witnessed

I watched a guy do the following and it looked like an interesting play.

Started with $110 inside after the come out. After a number of rolls he turned them off and laid the 4 and 10 for $50 each. He had $100-$110 at stake at all times

I failed to notice if he turned inside off after so many hits, or some many rolls. ( I was the shooter for part of this so wasn't watching him real close)
Since Craps statisticians tell us there are an average of 3.5 rolls between a point being made or a seven-out occurring. Iam guessing 3 rolls because I made the point 2x and he was on the 4/10 when I sevened out.

My questions are as follows

Does 3 rolls then off sound correct?
Can this play be done with a lesser amount (I have a much smaller bankroll then this guy had)
$44 inside then $20 laying 4 and 10 or do I need a min of $41 each on the 4 and 10

This system isn't going to make a person any more money than any other system out there.

Quote: JimmieKrack

I watched a guy do the following and it looked like an interesting play.

Started with $110 inside after the come out. After a number of rolls he turned them off and laid the 4 and 10 for $50 each. He had $100-$110 at stake at all times

I failed to notice if he turned inside off after so many hits, or some many rolls. ( I was the shooter for part of this so wasn't watching him real close)
Since Craps statisticians tell us there are an average of 3.5 rolls between a point being made or a seven-out occurring. Iam guessing 3 rolls because I made the point 2x and he was on the 4/10 when I sevened out.

My questions are as follows

Does 3 rolls then off sound correct?
Can this play be done with a lesser amount (I have a much smaller bankroll then this guy had)
$44 inside then $20 laying 4 and 10 or do I need a min of $41 each on the 4 and 10

The best part about his system is that he sometimes turned off the negative place bets. The best system would be to turn off the place bets every roll.

Quote: Beethoven9th

This system isn't going to make a person any more money than any other system out there.

No, but it will lose a lot more than many of them.

Quote: JimmieKrack

I watched a guy do the following and it looked like an interesting play.

Started with $110 inside after the come out. After a number of rolls he turned them off and laid the 4 and 10 for $50 each. He had $100-$110 at stake at all times

I failed to notice if he turned inside off after so many hits, or some many rolls. ( I was the shooter for part of this so wasn't watching him real close)
Since Craps statisticians tell us there are an average of 3.5 rolls between a point being made or a seven-out occurring. Iam guessing 3 rolls because I made the point 2x and he was on the 4/10 when I sevened out.

My questions are as follows

Does 3 rolls then off sound correct?
Can this play be done with a lesser amount (I have a much smaller bankroll then this guy had)
$44 inside then $20 laying 4 and 10 or do I need a min of $41 each on the 4 and 10

min. lay on 4 & 10 is $41

Quote: CrapsGenious

min. lay on 4 & 10 is $41

Another pearl of wisdom from the "genious". *facepalm*

To the OP: Don't listen to the "genious". You can lay the 4 or 10 for $20, if you want. The problem is that although the commission is $0.50, the house will round it up to $1.00. So you will end up paying 10% commission instead of 5%.

It would be cool if the rules were changed whereby the player can turn off/on some of the place bets. On with the 4, off with 6 & 8, on with the 9. Take down the 10.

I think in Las Vegas they will let you lay the 4/10 for $20, but most casinos elsewhere I've played in required a minimum of $40 + $1 vig.

Quote: treetopbuddy

It would be cool if the rules were changed whereby the player can turn off/on some of the place bets. On with the 4, off with 6 & 8, on with the 9. Take down the 10.

You can, although the dealers hate it.

I think TreeTop was being facetious.