Yup we need a whole lot less folks here getting upset over the dawg.
Dawg suggests I start my own adventure thread
That shouldn't upset people on here, right?
(NY AP thread anyone?)
MDawg is allowed to say those things. The rest of the forum may say they don't believe him, but they may not say MDawg is lying. Assuming your paraphrasing is correct, I wouldn't believe him either in the same way I don't believe Alan's 18 yo's in a row.
Let me respond to other comments about the tax return idea. MDawg comes to Vegas a lot. If he is willing, I would be willing to look at his tax return and report only on what he lists under gambling winnings. I am also willing to look at casino annual win/loss statements, although these are not very reliable and he could cherry pick those that show wins. Still, it would be something.
Two things and then I am done.
In the first paragraph, the point is that you HAVE publicly stated you don't believe Alan's claim. And you have publicly stated you don't believe Singer can overcome -EV with progression wagering. And every time someone shows up promoting some version of Martingale, you immediately shoot that down. But with these MDawg claims, in the same league if not worse, you have for the most part remained silent. YOU are the gambling expert. When you don't say something it matters as much as when you do. I am sorry to put that responsibility on you that you have to call out claims that defy math, but you do need to do so at least with the worst of them....the ones that are repeated over and over, with pictures and trip reports.
And the second paragraph, again, why with the tax returns or any documentation that can be manipulated. The claims are that he wins almost every session. Why would the bet not be people witnessing his play? Alan is big on that....he wanted to film me play which I couldn't agree to for obvious reasons. Lets get Mr. Showbiz, Alan involved. lol And by the way my apologizes to Alan for rehashing the 18 yo's. I know he wants to put that behind him, but it is just a perfect parallel to one claim being called out while another isn't.
Will post in separate thread
would the proof be that I produce documents from people "claiming" to have seen me run a 3 minute mile, or would the proof be people get to witness me run a 3 minute mile?
You didn't witness the world-record mile run, but you accept that it occurred, based on documents from people claiming to have seen the event.
The documentation, videos and eyewitness testimony could have been fabricated, but it has been authenticated.
So can whatever proof MDawg provides be authenticated.
MDawg already offered everybody the opportunity to witness his play, nobody accepted.
Ask if he'll still let you witness his play, you don't need to risk anything to watch him play according to this...
come and deposit $50K at the cage. He may play whatever he wants to play BJ roulette craps Baccarat I don't care. No sports betting tho. So may I play whatever I want to play, but it has to be play at the same casino. At the end of two weeks I will be in the plus and I will have won more than he. It is a simple challenge, there is no side bet.
Everything should be posted in the Adventures of MDawg thread. There is nothing else.
It's been explained that casinos comp based on theoretical loss.
Is that not true?...do they comp based on actual wins or losses?
I missed seeing this last night but do want to address it. Theo loss is only the starting point. If a player is winning continually, the casino gets to the point that they don't want that action, even with a theo loss. And before they get to that point, they cut and eliminate comps.
I have a friend who works the pit at a large strip property (one of the 2 big chains). We have had discussion where I have taken the position that card counters shouldn't be banned for playing legally within the rules. He tells me that he has been part of decisions to not allow players to play at all sorts of different games just because they are continually winning. He says if a player is winning session after session, day after day, a decision will be made to not allow further play, without even being able to determine if they are cheating, or playing with an advantage or have just been extraordinarily lucky.
And before they decide we don't want your action, they cease comps and offers. As a matter of fact, the loss of comps and offers is often one of the very first counter measures against AP's. It is often a "warning sign" that sometimes players miss.
This idea that a casino is going to comp a player winning session after session, day after day for weeks at a time, trip after trip is nuts. The casinos are not in the business of giving away more than they take in. What MDawg is describing, the high end suites, all meals, spa treatments, shows comped, the shopping sprees, is what is thrown at losing high rollers, not continually winning players....at least not for long.
I am sure there will be MANY more posts from KewlJ both in this thread and at WOV notwithstanding his assurance that he is done here. 🤓
None of what he says is based on anything that he knows for a fact. Just repeating what "a friend" has said to him, or what he thinks ought to be true. I'm the one living it, I should know. I've won consistently at casinos all my life, and the only time I was shown the door was when I kept winning too consistently at Blackjack. No one has ever molested me for my Baccarat wins.
Actually more than a few people are advising me to chill out and stop talking, that there are far too many people chattering about me all over the internet, and some of those might be people with whom no one respectable would want any sort of connection.
I've won consistently at casinos all my life,
Will you allow an observer?
Thinking of moving to Vegas just to watch your play.
I like to see the impossible for myself
This idea that a casino is going to comp a player winning session after session, day after day for weeks at a time, trip after trip is nuts.
Are you conceding that MDawg has been comped at the level he's claimed?
Should we expect casinos to offer freeplay to a player that you described above?