tropicalsue
tropicalsue
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 1
Joined: Dec 7, 2015
December 7th, 2015 at 7:29:52 AM permalink
Hi, I like to try a new way of playing Texas Holdem. All hole cards are dealt face up. And all ante & betting played the usual way. This way there obviously would be no challenge, just simple, easy & fair play. The best hand at the river wins. I think it would be a bit faster play also.

I came to this idea when I played table games over the years & felt strongly that there was some possible collusion and/or other types of cheating going on. I played a lot of video poker also & was discouraged at those games as well.

I thought wouldn't it be nice to just play some straight poker with no hassle or unfair advantage by casinos or colluders. So I came up with this simple idea. And I wonder if the odds would be better for the players also? I imagine the odds would be better by just removing bluffing, etc..

I would like to know your thoughts on this idea. Thank you.
muleyvoice
muleyvoice
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 135
Joined: Nov 14, 2015
December 7th, 2015 at 8:35:03 AM permalink
Since you asked Sue, does the word BORING ring a bell ?
Romes
Romes
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 5602
Joined: Jul 22, 2014
December 7th, 2015 at 8:46:40 AM permalink
You would have to butcher payouts or make some very odd house rule changes. If the players were allowed to know all of the cards, including the dealers hands in which I presume they're playing against... Then they'll just fold when they have the worst hand and raise/call when they have the best hand. Thus, they'll never play a losing hand (example would be UTH calling after the river). This would be a complete player advantage and thus like I said you'd have to butcher payouts/etc to make it somehow fair.

Then I'll agree with muley that it would be severely boring.
Playing it correctly means you've already won.
TwoFeathersATL
TwoFeathersATL
  • Threads: 37
  • Posts: 3616
Joined: May 22, 2013
December 7th, 2015 at 9:18:09 AM permalink
Hole card face up? That ain't hole card.
Youuuuuu MIGHT be a 'rascal' if.......(nevermind ;-)...2F
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 207
  • Posts: 10992
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 7th, 2015 at 10:10:09 AM permalink
Romes -

The OP is talking about regular poker.


Sue -

Try playing it with your friends. Removing the bluffing option also removes all the skill.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
December 7th, 2015 at 11:14:15 AM permalink
This would be dumb. You would essentially be playing video poker. You would be able to calculate the exact odds of winning and bet accordingly. I prefer winning hands of 56 suited when the board has a rainbow all cards higher than 7.
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
December 7th, 2015 at 5:55:03 PM permalink
why don't you just flip a coin? why go thru all the rituals of turning cards?
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
December 7th, 2015 at 8:00:10 PM permalink
Quote: andysif

why don't you just flip a coin? why go thru all the rituals of turning cards?



It would be a little more complicated than just flipping a coin. You would still have to make a decision to call on a draw.
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
AlmondBread
AlmondBread
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 30
Joined: Jul 3, 2015
December 9th, 2015 at 12:52:26 PM permalink
Hardly anyone would play it but I would. It would be pure math, and plenty of players would still make mistakes (though most of those players probably wouldn't play this game to begin with). There are a few rare situations where even most good players would make mistakes. The game would be all about bet-sizing, deciding whether to chase, and exploiting the tendencies of which math mistakes your opponents make. Very few players would know how to maximally exploit bad villains in multiway pots.

But I'm not sure if the rake would be beatable unless the players were pretty bad or were pure gamblers treating it like a table game hoping to hit draws.
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
December 9th, 2015 at 1:46:32 PM permalink
The main problem and the game killer would be you knew your exact outs and if anyone held the cards that you needed.
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
spr1000
spr1000
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 44
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
March 23rd, 2016 at 3:19:01 PM permalink
Why don't you just play Ultimate Texas Hold Em? Bluffing is a key element of NL. If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen.
Deucekies
Deucekies
  • Threads: 57
  • Posts: 1426
Joined: Jan 20, 2014
March 23rd, 2016 at 8:12:32 PM permalink
Maybe a game more to the OPs taste would be Blind Man's Bluff. Played like Texas Hold em, but everyone holds their cards up to their foreheads. This way, you see everybody's cards, but the rub is you don't see your own.
Casinos are not your friends, they want your money. But so does Disneyland. And there is no chance in hell that you will go to Disneyland and come back with more money than you went with. - AxelWolf and Mickeycrimm
Dalex64
Dalex64
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 1067
Joined: Feb 10, 2013
March 23rd, 2016 at 8:24:52 PM permalink
I don't think it would necessarily be boring.

It would be really different, though, like those blackjack tournaments where people are making bets based on the size of their own AND other people's stacks, and deviating from basic strategy trying to catch a break, against the odds, to get ahead.

It makes it much more about luck and less about skill, so I could see how that would make it more boring.
98Clubs
98Clubs
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 1728
Joined: Jun 3, 2010
March 27th, 2016 at 10:38:27 PM permalink
Basically, what the OP intends is something similar to 5-Card Stud (1-down, 4-up). That game is dead in the WSOP.

OTOH, a third face-up pocket card would be much more interesting. For example pocket is 1-down, 1 up, bet, flop, bet, turn and river, bet, 1 pocket down, showdown.
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
  • Jump to: