Poll

1 vote (4.54%)
4 votes (18.18%)
6 votes (27.27%)
1 vote (4.54%)
5 votes (22.72%)
2 votes (9.09%)
No votes (0%)
4 votes (18.18%)
4 votes (18.18%)
1 vote (4.54%)

22 members have voted

Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
  • Threads: 1419
  • Posts: 24211
November 8th, 2020 at 9:20:35 AM permalink
Quote: UCivan

WOO, may I suggest you analyze Zombie Blackjack.



I already did.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
Halesini
Halesini
Joined: Feb 15, 2020
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
November 11th, 2020 at 10:18:07 AM permalink
I visited Vegas in Feb2020 having not been for 3 years. It was noticeable how many casinos were offering Buster Blackjack whilst I couldn't find one offering the Top 3 variant of 21+3 (three card poker hands with 270/1 for suited trips, 180/1 straight flush, 90/1 trips). That suggested Buster was making the casinos a lot more money than Top 3 ever did (its still available and popular here in the Uk).

Buster Blackjack looks crazy. Realistically you may see dealer bust with 5 or 6 cards what less than 10% of the time they bust? and as for 7 or 8 I think I have yet to see that. Easily looks one of the worst bets in the casino. But clearly its attractive to some players.

  • Jump to: