Poll

4 votes (50%)
4 votes (50%)
No votes (0%)
2 votes (25%)
1 vote (12.5%)
1 vote (12.5%)
2 votes (25%)
1 vote (12.5%)
No votes (0%)
No votes (0%)

8 members have voted

Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26508
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 18th, 2022 at 6:52:16 PM permalink
I saw a new game at Binion's on Friday called Dealer Open Pai Gow. It's pretty much the same thing as Face Up Pai Gow Poker, except the takeback is the dealer automatically wins if he has two or more jacks.

For all the rules and analysis, please see my new page on Dealer Open Pai Gow.

The question for the poll is would you play Dealer Open Pai Gow?
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 11015
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
December 18th, 2022 at 7:01:01 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I saw a new game at Binion's on Friday called Dealer Open Pai Gow. It's pretty much the same thing as Face Up Pai Gow Poker, except the takeback is the dealer automatically wins if he has two or more jacks.

For all the rules and analysis, please see my new page on Dealer Open Pai Gow.

The question for the poll is would you play Dealer Open Pai Gow?
link to original post



At least you still have to think to play this new variant. As opposed to Face Up which requires no decision making which is not patently obvious. But the bad feeling of only tying the dealer who has an ace high Pai Gow will only be half as bad as having your 4 queens with a pair of aces LOSE to the dealers Jacks with a 9-10 up top!
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26508
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 18th, 2022 at 7:36:18 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

At least you still have to think to play this new variant. As opposed to Face Up which requires no decision making which is not patently obvious.
link to original post



You don't have to think in this variant either.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 11015
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
December 18th, 2022 at 8:00:31 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Quote: SOOPOO

At least you still have to think to play this new variant. As opposed to Face Up which requires no decision making which is not patently obvious.
link to original post



You don't have to think in this variant either.
link to original post



Oh. Then I’d like it less. I’m glad my local casino still has ‘regular’ Pai Gow.
ams288
ams288
  • Threads: 22
  • Posts: 6517
Joined: Sep 26, 2012
Thanked by
SOOPOO
December 19th, 2022 at 9:26:08 AM permalink
I’d play it, but I think I’d prefer Face Up.

I imagine having a monster hand and LOSING to a pair of jacks would be more frustrating than pushing on an Ace high.

They had this version at Circus Circus LV as well earlier this year.
Ding Dong the Witch is Dead
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26508
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 19th, 2022 at 12:24:23 PM permalink
Quote: ams288

I’d play it, but I think I’d prefer Face Up.

I imagine having a monster hand and LOSING to a pair of jacks would be more frustrating than pushing on an Ace high.



The dealer motions for the players to just throw their cards away without looking at them if she has two or more jacks. However, if the player made the side bets, he would still check them.

Quote:

They had this version at Circus Circus LV as well earlier this year.
link to original post



I guess Gaming is no longer updating their list of field trial games, unless this didn't need one, being so similar to Face Up.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2942
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
December 19th, 2022 at 12:53:51 PM permalink
In the archives there's pdf rules for both a version 1 and a version 2

So it must have run the field trial gauntlet years ago. Note that version 1 has many optional payables.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
TinMan
TinMan
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 448
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Thanked by
GamblingDave
December 20th, 2022 at 1:12:01 AM permalink
Ah yes, this is the game I saw on my previous trip.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/trip-reports/37205-las-vegas-2022/#post852447

Looks like the house edge is pretty reasonable. Coincidentally I’m in Vegas now. Walked over to Binion’s and sat down. $10 table. I spent about 3 hours there. About 60% of that time other people were at the table. I feel like with a $100 and a full table, you could play that game until the sun ran out of energy and collapsed into itself. It was very leisurely and lots of pushes. I prefer the JJ mechanism to the A high mechanism for the house edge.

At one point, dealer miss-set her hand. I forget the exact cards but she had a Joker and could have gone some like Flush + AJ. Instead she went with something like pair + A7. I pushed a hand I should have lost.

Another time I had a losing hand but if I fouled my hand it would look like a push. I wanted to see if the dealer would identify the foul. Sadly, she did.

When I got up they closed the table. It was pretty fun and cheap at $10. I’d play again if I wanted to do something leisurely without the big swings of something like craps.
If anyone gives you 10,000 to 1 on anything, you take it. If John Mellencamp ever wins an Oscar, I am going to be a very rich dude.
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 207
  • Posts: 10992
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 20th, 2022 at 6:15:29 AM permalink
I don’t get how the side bet for the jacks, with a 7.98% rate of occurrence generates a 1.82% edge for the main game.

That said, assuming the edges are correct, the difference in edges between this game and face up are insignificant.

Therefore, since this can turn winners into losers, I think I’d rather play face up with its ability to turn losers and winners into pushes. I mean, turning a loser into a push happens less than turning a winner into a push, but I’d hate it if a winner lost.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
December 20th, 2022 at 4:12:39 PM permalink
It does look as if the best strategy is not to look at your hand until the Dealer has acted. This would also suggest it's best not to play any sidebets which might force you/Dealer to look at your hand.

Personally I also don't look at a 3CP hand, or similar games, until the Dealer has confirmed the dealing is finished and correct - I once saw someone not win the sidebet-only AKQs becuase the Dealer only had two cards.

I guess it's similar to the Push 22 rule; would you prefer that or the Dealer automatically wins with (say) 8 or Spades (I have no idea of the maths, but you get the idea).
PGBuster
PGBuster
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 102
Joined: Jan 15, 2010
February 17th, 2023 at 1:38:18 PM permalink
Mike,
Your page mentions a "Push Ace High" rule--number four. However, I see no other reference to this bet on the page. I assume this is an error and that the Ace High isn't a push as well?

As to the original question, I would never play this game. Ever. Its like Double Exposure BJ, but worse.
  • Jump to: