![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
A roulette method with teeth
| September 5th, 2010 at 8:16:03 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Nov 2, 2009 Threads: 148 Posts: 2649 |
Have all the balls you want, anyone with brains knows all roulette "systems" are snake-oil BS. I do, however, know the only system to win at roulette. Ready? BUY A CASINO AND OPEN A ROULETTE TABLE! "The Roman Empire wasn't planned, but neither did it 'just happen.'" |
| September 5th, 2010 at 8:25:27 AM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | Well doesn't 'snake oil' revolve around sales? Which I dont do. On a sidenote, you do realize why/how I continue to want you to post, right? lol Probably not. Like I said, (this is a FACT), some will play this, even if its just for dollar chips and I'll never hear from them and thats alright. How do you play or do you troll from BOARD to BOARD looking for posts to rip, out of sheer boredom? lol I win and you dont, sorry bro, them the breaks. Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 5th, 2010 at 8:39:06 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Nov 2, 2009 Threads: 148 Posts: 2649 |
Was going to say something about you being discrfedited so much that you just decided to declare victory and go home, but never mind. "The Roman Empire wasn't planned, but neither did it 'just happen.'" |
| September 5th, 2010 at 8:42:04 AM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | Discredited? lol Post whatever you want. I think you KNOW ME well enough that I dont care. BTW, what does this mean? >>> "We see that AZDuffman is a liar that simply repeats his lies." (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 5th, 2010 at 9:45:34 AM permalink | |
| thecesspit Member since: Apr 19, 2010 Threads: 36 Posts: 2644 | Well I've played Roulette more than 5 times, and my method doesn't seem to win, but here's what I do: I play The corners, the pairs and the two blocks of 6 including 29. I don't play 29 itself. Seperating fact from opinion, 29 is as good as any other and if it does hit, I have a nice coup. If it doesn't, that's roulette and I'm asking myself why I'm spending time on it (I find the wheel dull and the edge high, but sometimes I keep my friend company on the 50c wheel). I don't know why a street is better than a column or any other 3 numbers, as most of the time the numbers in a street are not physically associated on the wheel. Your system is as good or bad as any other, and over the long haul, me and you will have about the same Net EV. Feel free to rip my system or use it. Laugh Out Loud. "Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept through nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire, for a coup at trente-et-quarante" - Honore de Balzac, 1829 |
| September 5th, 2010 at 9:51:00 AM permalink | |
| nope27 Member since: Sep 5, 2010 Threads: 5 Posts: 126 |
This sounds like variation from: http://freeroulette.tripod.com/systems.htm the EPOS street bet. from Ludica Roulette systems. They have a few excel worksheets that can be downloaded showing some math behind roulette. I have used the software Roulette Xtreme to run sims specifically using the last 14 numbers of the EPOS system. It has been a while since I studied the roulette system, as I only used it to study the math behind roulette. I need to do some hunting to locate my studies. I do remember sim results that showed it did not matter if you played a "street" or any 3 numbers. But since a street is convenient it is easy to use. My question to mrjjj: is what type of grid do you use to instantly "see" what streets are ready to be bet and the ones that stop being bet? Seems to me to be a logistical nightmare to accomplish with paper and pencil. In my opinion, the Wizard of Vegas forum members like to see math and how it applies. I know I do. You seem to have only shown how to bet but have not shown the math about why you bet? Any reason for this?
This seems like a good math problem. Is it x = 12 there is a y% chance of a 3/38? My English is not so good asking math questions. |
| September 5th, 2010 at 10:17:27 AM permalink | |
| Keyser Member since: Apr 16, 2010 Threads: 17 Posts: 528 | Mr. J., I sense that you're probably still new to roulette. First off, there's nothing wrong with having a little fun once in a while playing at small units like you're doing. I've seen where you have attempted to demonstrate that you have the edge. However, please try to understand that you can't step outside of probability by just standing on the side lines while writing the numbers. Each spin in the random game of roulette is an independent trial. In the long run, you will lose more than you will win. The wizardofodds.com does a great job of explaining why if you'd like to read more. -Keyser |
| September 5th, 2010 at 10:26:28 AM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | "I sense that you're probably still new to roulette" >>> Umm, well :) For THIS method, I do not like (betting) on a number within a street if the street is cold or semi-cold. We all know, a street can sleep (or ONE number hit in a street) for MANY spins. I have avoided this issue 100%. If there are two numbers hit in a street within 12 spins, its hard to say that street is cold, you would agree with that? "In the long run, you will lose more than you will win" >>> I bought half a restaurant with my ROULETTE winnings. Luck? Yeah.....probably so. Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 5th, 2010 at 10:29:40 AM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | Well I've played Roulette more than 5 times, and my method doesn't seem to win, but here's what I do: I play The corners, the pairs and the two blocks of 6 including 29. I don't play 29 itself. Seperating fact from opinion, 29 is as good as any other and if it does hit, I have a nice coup. If it doesn't, that's roulette and I'm asking myself why I'm spending time on it (I find the wheel dull and the edge high, but sometimes I keep my friend company on the 50c wheel). I don't know why a street is better than a column or any other 3 numbers, as most of the time the numbers in a street are not physically associated on the wheel. Your system is as good or bad as any other, and over the long haul, me and you will have about the same Net EV. Feel free to rip my system or use it. Laugh Out Loud. >>>>> I dont rip methods, not my department. I said I played *THIS* method 5 times (live), not counting the countless number of hours testing. Good luck to you. Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 5th, 2010 at 10:32:47 AM permalink | |
| EvenBob Member since: Jul 18, 2010 Threads: 199 Posts: 5034 |
I've seen Ken on other gambling forums since about 2006. Is that new? He's been playing for a few years. How long do you have to play for till you're not 'new' anymore? "Gambling doesn't build character, it reveals it." |
![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
