![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
A roulette method with teeth
| September 4th, 2010 at 6:25:58 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | I know some will play this and I'll never hear a word from them, I accept that. Some might even rip the method AND still play it. lol This is flat betting. I use units of $15, $10 and $5 but use whatever fits your budget the best. I try and separate fact from opinion. A fact is, in 'X' number of spins, we will get a complete street hit, all 3 numbers. I do have to thank Bayes ahead of time, he helped me a bit. Ok, on to the method >> I keep track of the last *12* numbers hit. When the next number hits, cross off the latest number, we will always be looking at the LAST 12. Any street with TWO of the numbers hit, is what we are looking for. Example: the 14 and 15 are hit within the 12 recorded. We flat bet the 13 UNTIL either a win OR until either the 14 or 15 is NOT within the 12 recorded anymore. I have done lots of testing recording the last 11, 10, 13 and 14 spins, I have found that *12* works the best. Anytime all 3 (a win) are within the 12, no more betting on that number UNTIL it drops back to two within the street. EXAMPLE: We were betting on the 13, it hits and we have a win. Lets say a couple spins later, the 14 drops from the last 12 recorded. We NOW have the 13 and 15 hit so we bet on the 14 until either a win OR until either the 13 or 15 is NOT within 12 recorded anymore. Don't make this tougher than it is. Sometimes I over explain stuff. lol There are some spins where NO betting will take place. Now, what about multiple bets going on? This is what I do in terms of betting. 1-2 bets: I bet $15 per number, 3 bets: I bet $10 per number, 4+ bets: I bet $5 per number. It is very rare to have 4+ within 12 but you MUST have a RULE for every situation. My BR is 3K but use what you can afford. No progression here, that should make a few happy. Its VERY common for a street to hit within a short (12) period of time. What I like about this most, we are NOT betting on semi-cold streets. My win goal is 1K, then go home. Any questions, just ask. Thanks for reading. Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 4th, 2010 at 6:33:17 PM permalink | |
| benbakdoff Member since: Jul 13, 2010 Threads: 17 Posts: 448 | Please tell me you are at least playing single zero wheels. |
| September 4th, 2010 at 6:40:15 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | We only have 00 here. We had a 0 wheel but they took it out. lol Oh well. Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 4th, 2010 at 7:32:39 PM permalink | |
| Keyser Member since: Apr 16, 2010 Threads: 17 Posts: 528 | Why do you feel this method will work? |
| September 4th, 2010 at 7:37:04 PM permalink | |
| SOOPOO Member since: Aug 8, 2010 Threads: 40 Posts: 961 | Well as long as you are not betting on 'semi cold streets' there is no way you can lose. Unless you have an unfair wheel... why am I even trying... |
| September 4th, 2010 at 7:41:50 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | @Keyser >> Some of that was answered. I have played this (B&M casino) 5 times and have zero losses. Yes I know, 5 is not alot. I like this method because I am not betting on semi-cold streets. A street that has not hit in a long time? No biggie, I'm not betting on any numbers in it. A street with only one hit in it? No biggie, I'm not betting on any numbers in it. Its flat betting. If things start to get 'out of control', quit. For myself, I only need TWO wins (gross) to meet my goal of 1K. Thats with betting $15 per. Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 4th, 2010 at 8:52:59 PM permalink | |
| dwheatley Member since: Nov 16, 2009 Threads: 8 Posts: 489 |
Not actually a fact, for ANY value of X. Except X = infinity, but that would be a long time to play roulette... Wisdom is the quality that keeps you out of situations where you would otherwise need it |
| September 4th, 2010 at 10:05:06 PM permalink | |
| mkl654321 Member since: Aug 8, 2010 Threads: 65 Posts: 3412 | Wow..how totally amazing that no one has thought this up in the last three hundred years. An INFALLIBLE WAY to beat a game with a 5% house edge. Oh boy, I'm quitting my job tomorrow! Aren't you afraid that a severe consequence of your post might be that the casinos will get wind of this and post armed guards at every roulette table to try to stop you from playing? The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw |
| September 5th, 2010 at 12:02:46 AM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | @mkl654321 >> Its actually 5.26% coolbreeze. If you dont like it....dont play it, problem solved. Your method of choice is what? I'll start testing it Sunday. Thanks, Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
| September 5th, 2010 at 12:04:46 AM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 56 Posts: 1076 | "Not actually a fact, for ANY value of X" >>> Wrong answer, it is a fact. I can do this all day long. Your method of choice is.....? I want to start some testing on it Sunday. Thanks, Ken (AP is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. |
![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
