teliot
teliot
  • Threads: 43
  • Posts: 2871
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
April 16th, 2015 at 4:07:24 PM permalink
I have a rule for responding to e-mail. Roughly speaking, if I think it will take me less than 2 minutes to completely answer an e-mail, I respond pretty much right when I read it. These quick replies reduce opportunity costs; in the long run I save time by these quick responses.

What I have noticed is that some people appear to purposely not answer e-mail for several days even though I am sure they have read my e-mail and a timely response would be both polite and easy. It drives me crazy to have to write a second e-mail asking if they got my first e-mail.

Is there some minimum time that people wait to respond, even if they have the opportunity and a response would just take a moment?

Is being "fashionably late" part of modern e-mail culture?

Not including times you are too busy to respond, does anyone here intentionally wait some minimum period to respond?
Climate Casino: https://climatecasino.net/climate-casino/
Kerkebet
Kerkebet
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 362
Joined: Oct 2, 2014
April 16th, 2015 at 4:25:57 PM permalink
Quote: teliot

Is being "fashionably late" part of modern e-mail culture?


To add to the Wizard's list of excuses in the Amigotechs Warning Part-2 thread, "I'll get back to you."
Nonsense is a very hard thing to keep up. Just ask the Wizard and company.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22280
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
April 16th, 2015 at 4:34:10 PM permalink
Quote: teliot

I have a rule for responding to e-mail. Roughly speaking, if I think it will take me less than 2 minutes to completely answer an e-mail, I respond pretty much right when I read it. These quick replies reduce opportunity costs; in the long run I save time by these quick responses.

What I have noticed is that some people appear to purposely not answer e-mail for several days even though I am sure they have read my e-mail and a timely response would be both polite and easy. It drives me crazy to have to write a second e-mail asking if they got my first e-mail.

Is there some minimum time that people wait to respond, even if they have the opportunity and a response would just take a moment? Is being "fashionably late" part of modern e-mail culture?

Sometimes people check and read email on their phone but find it difficult to respond using small keys while typing. They might put it off till they get home then they forget. I check my email only once in a while unless I'm expecting something.

Perhaps they don't know what they want to say just yet or need information before they can respond.

But I haven't heard of anything that suggests there's a "fashionably late" modern e-mail culture. It's a individual situation. Some people are attached to their email some are not.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
surrender88s
surrender88s
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 291
Joined: Jun 23, 2013
April 16th, 2015 at 5:03:45 PM permalink
If someone gets a quick reply from you 2 or 3 times, then on a harder or more in-depth or personal email- they may consider your longer time in responding as being ignored, or some other perception. Because of this, for certain people, I never respond back right away. I may even type up a full response, and save it as a draft to send a bit later.

I agree with you that there are trade-offs, because if you don't respond right away, you're basically guaranteeing that you'll be spending more time looking at that e-mail, while also increasing the risk that you forget to get back in a timely manner.
"Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1." -Warren Buffett on risk/return
beachbumbabs
beachbumbabs
  • Threads: 100
  • Posts: 14265
Joined: May 21, 2013
April 16th, 2015 at 5:32:52 PM permalink
I try to "touch it once", so if I get an email needing a response, I usually write back immediately. OTOH, I only check email once/twice a day on average, so it might be 24 hours before I respond. No mind games - just trying to be efficient and not computer-bound. If it's a response requiring a detailed reply and I don't have the time, I'll tell the person I got their message and will take some time to respond, just so they're not hanging.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
AZDuffman
AZDuffman 
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13962
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
April 17th, 2015 at 11:57:55 AM permalink
Emails that take a simple answer I try to get back to instantly when I am sitting and can see them. If I only have my phone I wait to reply unless it is very important. Count me among those that have bad eyes and don't like the small keys. But I will say I am at my phone and got it, will get back.

In my line of work "emergencies" are rare. Sometimes they come up and if they do I try to use the phone as what needs conveyed often is too much to type.

In the end, most of what I am typing revolves around "did you get it?", "I got it," and "do you have it." Since my replies take just a line no need to wait. Additionally, I want to keep my clients so I return emails. Many are M-O-N-E-Y, so no fooling around.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 207
  • Posts: 10992
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
April 17th, 2015 at 12:02:06 PM permalink
Quote: AxelWolf

Sometimes people check and read email on their phone but find it difficult to respond using small keys while typing.


Ding, ding, ding.

That's my excuse / reason.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
  • Jump to: