Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard.
Here are my reasons why and my promise of support.

Match play dispute

Page 1 of 3123>
Poll
28 votes (93.33%)
1 vote (3.33%)
1 vote (3.33%)

30 members have voted

February 8th, 2011 at 2:07:19 PM permalink
Wizard
Administrator
Member since: Oct 14, 2009
Threads: 313
Posts: 6776
Here is a Gaming dispute somebody just asked me for a comment on about one of the many video poker bars around town and a match play mailer. What do you think?

Quote:
wiz,
here is what i sent to the GCB about a recent event. can you give me your opinion?
thanks,
ben

I had previously used a $25 Match Play coupon there on Thursday February 3, 2011 so I thought I was familiar with how it worked. On the Thursday February 3 trip I was required to put my own $25 in the machine and play it through (20 hands @ $1.25/hand). Once I had played the $25 thru the machine the bartender then inserted $25 of the bars money in the machine for me to play. I played approximately 20 more hands and cashed out around $22 and was paid by the bartender with no issues. I was logged on to their tracking system so this can all be verified. The incident which caused me to call the GCB happened on Sunday February 6, 2011 I went to BJ's West on Tenaya and 215. I had an offer for a $20 Match Play coupon. After I had cycled through my $20 by playing the required 16 hands @ $1.25 I asked for the bartender to insert the bars $20 match play into the machine. I was then told that I had to lose my $20 in order to get their $20 in match play. I have lived in Vegas for 15 years and have never had a match play where I was required to lose my money before they would honor their offer. I have only been required to play the equivalent of the match play offer, in this case, $20, through the machine. I proceeded to lose my $20 in the machine like I was told I had to do before the bartender would insert their $20 in the machine for me to play. After the bartender put their $20 in the machine I was then told that I had to lose that $20 also. I asked if I was allowed to play it through and then cash out and was told no. The only was I was allowed to cash out was if I hit something above the $20 amount and then if I cashed out they would keep the $20 and I would only receive the amount that was left after the $20 was deducted regardless of how many times it was cycled through the machine. To put it best, if I was to hit for $100 they would only pay me $80 regardless of how many times I had cycled their original $20 through their machines. To the best of my recollection it does not say anywhere on the coupon that I was required to lose my $20 before they would honor the coupon but rather I had to play $20, which I did do. I feel their offer is deceptive and unethical. Essentially a person has to lose their $20 and the bars $20. I am all for giving the bar a fair shot at my money but I feel once I have cycled $20 through the machine I should be given the $20 match play they promised and then, after I have cycled their $20 through the machine I should be free to do what I want and cash out if that is my desire. Please let me know if you have any questions.[\q]
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
February 8th, 2011 at 2:14:10 PM permalink
DorothyGale
Member since: Nov 23, 2009
Threads: 40
Posts: 615
Pretty easy, really ...

If there are specified T&C's on the match play, it doesn't matter what the player thinks should happen. The T&C's prevail. If he didn't bother to read the T&C's before going to play, it's his own fault. This type of thing happens all the time with Internet Casino MPs.

On the other hand, if the T&C's don't back up this ridiculous scenario, then the player should and will prevail.

So, what was on the coupon or posted disclaimer for this MP?

--Ms. D.
Resident OZ-like entity ...
February 8th, 2011 at 2:28:22 PM permalink
teddys
Member since: Nov 14, 2009
Threads: 100
Posts: 2723
This guy sounds like a "hustler." That's not a value judgment. He still has his rights. But the bar also has its rights to enforce the rules of its match play. If they didn't like the "cut of his jib" and just decided to screw him, that isn't right. It seems like the bar crossed the line here. But I don't give much hope for the player. On promotional issues, the player tends to lose. So, I think the player should prevail, but I think the bar will prevail.
"If you can make one heap of all your winnings / And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss / And lose, and start again at your beginnings / And never breathe a word about your loss..." -Rudyard Kipling
February 8th, 2011 at 2:32:59 PM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Nov 11, 2009
Threads: 218
Posts: 7275
I hate coupons for reasons such as these. Either the terms are confusing or incomplete, or some schmoe just doesn't read them.

Anyway, is it just me, or did the bar have a really lousy offer? I mean, if it costs you $20 to win $20 in match play, which will be deducted from winnings, what's the point? Sure, if you play $20 and lose, it's fine to get $20 more to play. Otherwise, why bother?
This space is closed for remodeling
February 8th, 2011 at 2:34:35 PM permalink
mkl654321
Member since: Aug 8, 2010
Threads: 65
Posts: 3412
1. Player SHOULD prevail.
2. Player will NOT prevail.

I base this prediction on the absolutely dismal record of the Gaming Control Board in enforcing player rights. I have heard of the Board ruling in a player's favor in cases that were absolutely unequivocal, and I suppose that it does happen, much as, I suppose, some people in Stalin's purge trials were declared innocent, but that isn't exactly a frequent outcome.

I don't gamble in Nevada bars for the exact reason that caused this problem in the first place--what the bartender says, goes. Illegal or not, unfair or not.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
February 8th, 2011 at 3:22:18 PM permalink
dm
Member since: Apr 29, 2010
Threads: 14
Posts: 699
Without thinking too long, isn't it impossible for them to lose from the matchplay standpoint? Aren't they risking zero? Sounds like they are loaning you 20, which they are certain to get back by your losing it, or forfeiting that amount from your win. Not to mention the first 20 you already lost to get ......nothing.
February 8th, 2011 at 4:27:31 PM permalink
Wizard
Administrator
Member since: Oct 14, 2009
Threads: 313
Posts: 6776
Let me go back and ask the player what the mailer said. It would not surprise me if it was vague.

Regarding Gaming, my opinion is they have started taking the player's side more often lately. For example, a friend of mine was given a free play offer from a LV casino (I'm not sure I can say which one). When he asked for his money they said "no," because he was on a list of known advantage players. So he called Gaming, and the agent pretty much said that they to honor the offer, which my friend had in writing. The casino could have asked for a formal ruling, but they elected to honor the offer after the agent had a talk with them.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
February 8th, 2011 at 4:34:01 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Nov 2, 2009
Threads: 153
Posts: 2911
Quote: mkl654321
I base this prediction on the absolutely dismal record of the Gaming Control Board in enforcing player rights. I have heard of the Board ruling in a player's favor in cases that were absolutely unequivocal, and I suppose that it does happen, much as, I suppose, some people in Stalin's purge trials were declared innocent, but that isn't exactly a frequent outcome.



I go back to dealer school were we were told, by instructors who worked in NV and elsewhere, that the NG GCB was "casino protection oriented" and every last other state the local GCB was "player protection oriented."

BTW: That bar should be put in a hall of shame--match play of $20 when you lose $20 but you have to lose the $20? I'll tell you what, Griswold, just gime me $10 and we go in the alley, I'll kick you in the nuts, and we call it even?
"The Roman Empire wasn't planned, but neither did it 'just happen.'"
February 8th, 2011 at 5:31:38 PM permalink
boymimbo
Member since: Nov 12, 2009
Threads: 12
Posts: 2533
Match play to me means that they match a bet. You played with $20 and you get $20 to play with. Their offer is fair, of course.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
February 8th, 2011 at 6:10:20 PM permalink
weaselman
Member since: Jul 11, 2010
Threads: 17
Posts: 1922
Stories like this remind me of the argument, popular around here, why casinos don't cheat - why would the want to cheat if they already have the house edge?
By the same logic, why would they want to stiff you on a measly $20 coupon? The answer is the same in both cases - greed. Apparently, their house edge isn't enough - they want you to just GIVE them your twenty bucks.
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
Page 1 of 3123>

 

Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard.
Here are my reasons why and my promise of support.