 | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
Here's one for ya
| February 8th, 2012 at 8:57:48 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 | If you had to pick one of the two, which would you choose and why? Lets say I was keeping track of the hits in terms of the wheel itself. I want to find out which 2 numbers, side by side, are hitting the most over 150 spins. The choices are >> A) Playing on a regular wheel, multiple dealers. B) Playing airball roulette. C) It makes no huge difference, either one. Forget the other misc. stuff, minimum bet requirements etc., I'm not asking about that. Your choice would be? No, there is not a bias in either wheel (I find it funny, I always have to throw in that silly disclaimer). Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| February 8th, 2012 at 9:59:34 PM permalink | |
| FleaStiff Member since: Oct 19, 2009 Threads: 75 Posts: 4820 |
I don't quite know what airball roulette is but think that perhaps airhead might be a more relevant term to use ............. Multiple dealers? What difference would that make? AP is for suckers? Perhaps. Care to present some evidence? Gambler's Fallacy? You mean my betting on red really does affect the outcome of that next spin? |
| February 8th, 2012 at 10:03:41 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 |
(lol).....and there it is again. Just a simple question, a simple thread and........... Can anybody say?....GG Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| February 8th, 2012 at 10:42:19 PM permalink | |
| YoDiceRoll11 Member since: Jan 9, 2012 Threads: 7 Posts: 529 | AP isn't for suckers. But roulette is.... I select option D: Don't play roulette ever. Unless you hate money. Best of luck. (Insert fake sarcastic farewell). (Insert unverifiable name). |
| February 8th, 2012 at 10:49:51 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 | (lol) GG? If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| February 9th, 2012 at 3:27:53 AM permalink | |
| FinsRule Member since: Dec 23, 2009 Threads: 52 Posts: 775 | If I had to pick one, I'll pick, "it makes no huge difference, either one" which doesn't quite make sense, but neither does being forced to play roulette. |
| February 9th, 2012 at 9:03:00 AM permalink | |
| MathExtremist Member since: Aug 31, 2010 Threads: 46 Posts: 2518 |
By adding the disclaimer that there is no bias, the answer by definition is that it makes no difference at all. If it did make a difference, there would be a bias. "In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice."
-- Girolamo Cardano, 1563 |
| February 9th, 2012 at 4:52:10 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 |
At 'certain boards', I have to throw in the disclaimer. Sad but......whatever. Thank you for responding sir. Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |