![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
Harrah's Comps
| February 2nd, 2010 at 4:53:02 PM permalink | |
| toastcmu Member since: Nov 11, 2009 Threads: 16 Posts: 240 | Michael - I read your review, and you have confirmed what I've found playing Harrah's as well - their table game comps are very stingy. I know that the range for comping is 20-40% of theo, and I believe Harrah's properties use the 20% number more often than not. My experience with Atlantic City seems to be the opposite, of your review - if you hit 4 hrs of rated play, they seem to "increase" the room comps later down the road. However, I was wondering if the pit entered your data wrong - if you use $21 as your average bet with a 20% comp of theo, then the calculation comes out to $7.83, which seems very close to your $7.56. Just food for thought. -B |
| February 2nd, 2010 at 5:01:00 PM permalink | |
| Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 14, 2009 Threads: 312 Posts: 6757 | No. I asked them what they showed for my play, and they recorded both time and average bet correctly. It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet. |
| February 2nd, 2010 at 6:17:44 PM permalink | |
| toastcmu Member since: Nov 11, 2009 Threads: 16 Posts: 240 | Ouch! Guess that confirms the suspicions I had about their comps then. -B |
| February 2nd, 2010 at 9:05:02 PM permalink | |
| darrenfromindy Member since: Jan 23, 2010 Threads: 0 Posts: 35 | $100 blackjack at Paris for four hours nets about $8.00 in Total Rewards comps. Harrah's can keep their crappy "free" rooms at Flamingo or Harrah's. A $100/ four hour bettor at Mirage will get back roughly $140-$160 in comps, and you can play with a house edge that is TWICE better than what HET offers. |
| February 3rd, 2010 at 12:29:22 AM permalink | |
| Aussie Member since: Dec 29, 2009 Threads: 9 Posts: 166 | Wow! That is terrible. Certainly won't be giving harrahs much action when I'm in Vegas. For anyone ever at Crown Casino in Melbourne Australia they have what I think (I may be wrong) are very good deals for interstate and international players. A buy in of $5k will get you on a program that returns 0.3% of betting turnover returned in comps. A $10k buyin with turnover less than $100k get 0.4% and over $100k gets 0.5%. |
| February 3rd, 2010 at 6:50:38 AM permalink | |
| Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 14, 2009 Threads: 312 Posts: 6757 |
Are you saying the Crown in Melbourne has a "promotional chip" program, where they add 0.3% to 0.5% to your chip purchases? These programs are common in Macau, as I explain at Wizard of Macau. If not, how would they know what the turnover was? It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet. |
| February 3rd, 2010 at 8:42:22 AM permalink | |
| boymimbo Member since: Nov 12, 2009 Threads: 12 Posts: 2533 | Apparently HEC has a very different view for comps for table games and is treating its table games like a slot customer. If we take slots which earns 20 rewards credit per $100 bet (0.2%), the theoretical loss on a slot machine is about 7%. That means that for every $100 bet, the customer will lose $7 and receive a credit worth $.20, The casino is reimbursing only .20/7 = 3% of the theoretical loss. Even at video poker, which earns 0.1%, (10 rewards credits per $1,000 bet), at a 2% game, the casino is reimbursing only 5% of the theoretical loss. Some idiot in management at Harrah's probably applied the same formula to table games. After all, why should a blackjack player who is betting $10,000/hour (theoretical loss, $100) be treated any differently than a quarter video poker player who is betting ($1.25 x 10 x 60) $900 / hour (theoretical loss, $27 (at 3%, earning $.90) or a nickel slot machine player? While 0.1% - 0.2% for slot machine/video pokers returns are pretty much the industry norms, to apply the same formula to table games, while fair, does not reflect what the competition is doing. So you have to ask yourself how Harrah's has been penalized by reducing this compensation to table game players? First off, it offers very low room rates to its low level players and this encourages a very high return rate. Secondly, it takes away the cash rewards offered to the "hit and run" players who play for a few hours. Gaming Market Advisors published a detailed white paper on the Total Rewards marketing program. Clearly, the aim of Harrah's is to build loyalty and not to give comps on short term play. Some of the quotes:
Harrah's marketing strategy is to essentially then make the gamblers attempt to get to the "diamond level" by getting the 4,000 points required.
Harrah's did (still does?) have the "Diamond in a Day" program which can be earned at Vegas by earning 1,800 reward credits in one day. If this is a case, according to the calculation above, a blackjack player would receive 3 point for every $100 played ($100 x 1% x 2%) you would need to bet about $100/hand for 8 hours. At that point, even though you would have amassed about $18 in credits, you would be a Diamond member and would receive heavily discounted hotel offers and front of the line offers, free shows, and Cash, to all Harrah's venues among other things.
-----
You want the truth! You can't handle the truth! |
| February 3rd, 2010 at 9:22:59 AM permalink | |
| teddys Member since: Nov 14, 2009 Threads: 100 Posts: 2721 | This is very true what you said. The Total Rewards program is very aspirational. I made Platinum this year based on a positive E.V. video poker play that I hit pretty hard. They really do make you feel good by giving you tons of free offers for rooms, cash, chocolate boxes, slippers, etc. I must admit to occasionally finding myself itching for "Diamond" status, and then asking myself "Why?" --------------------- I always tell people who get angry watching the Diamond people pass them in line, "Don't worry, they lost more money last year than you probably made this month." --------------------- On the other hand, I find the Diamond in a Day program to be quite a good deal, if you can find a decent video poker machine on which to earn your points. (Admittedly, difficult to do at Harrah's). I believe the Wizard mentioned obtaining this status at the Harrah's in Laughlin once. Perhaps he would care to comment on his motives for doing this promotion? "If you can make one heap of all your winnings / And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss / And lose, and start again at your beginnings / And never breathe a word about your loss..." -Rudyard Kipling |
| February 3rd, 2010 at 10:33:17 AM permalink | |
| boymimbo Member since: Nov 12, 2009 Threads: 12 Posts: 2533 | The DIAD promotion I believe is still there but I think the requirements are different: something like 3,000 - 4,000, some say that it can be accumulated over 3 months. So in general, this would be difficult to achieve. -----
You want the truth! You can't handle the truth! |
| February 3rd, 2010 at 10:46:37 AM permalink | |
| Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 14, 2009 Threads: 312 Posts: 6757 | The "Diamond in a Day" rule is that if you earn 3,000 points in a day you immediately make Diamond status. I'm not sure if it is a midnight to midnight day, or any 24-hour period. I will have to look into that. It takes $30,000 in action at video poker to earn 3,000 points. On a $5 game ($25 total bet) that is 1,200 bets, which would take about 2-4 hours, depending on the speed of play. Around 2003 I made a trip to Harrah's in Laughlin, and made Diamond Status in about 2 hours playing either $5 or $10 10-7 double bonus, which has a return of 100.17%. So it was an easy way to make Diamond. The reason I did it is I heard that Diamond players received generous offers in the mail. As I recall, the caliber of the offers did improve, but I didn't act on any of them. It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet. |
![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
