![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
Slot Machine challenges (similar to betting system challenges)
| November 15th, 2011 at 10:04:01 AM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2025 |
Assume the challenger is a high roller who likes to play $100 slots. Are you willing to put $200k coin-in, and lose at least $8k (assuming 96% return) to win only $1,200, and risk losing another $1,000 on what amounts to basically a coin flip? A player at this level can easily absorb the loss. Could you?
I am not familiar with common slot ""systems", but wouldn't a component of a winning system be to stop losses and bank winnings? Forcing a challenger to play 3,000 spins creates an artificial hurdle that I don't think you would encounter in a "serious" (cough, cough, sorry, I just threw up in my mouth a little bit) slot system player. Nevertheless, here is how I would do it: -- Start with $1 slots. If ever up $30, stop. -- Move to penny slot, play one cent a spin for the balance of the 3,000 spin minimum. How often would a $1 slot player be up $30? I am totally guessing, but maybe a 50% chance in the first 100 spins? The bottom line is that having the option to switch to penny a spin "econo-mode" at anytime, negates the 3,000 spin minimum. |
| November 15th, 2011 at 10:06:53 AM permalink | |
| Doc Member since: Feb 27, 2010 Threads: 20 Posts: 2792 |
It appears he has that part covered. |
| November 15th, 2011 at 10:36:34 AM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2025 |
Thanks for pointing that out Doc. Still, the expected loss just running challenge #1, even at a dollar max, needs to be considered. I would assume anyone who takes it up, will play dollar slots due to the generally higher expected return. I would put Bluejay on Megabucks, with its lousy 89% expected return. Of his $6,000 through, he would be expected to lose $660. All for a chance to win $1000 on a coin flip? |
| November 15th, 2011 at 10:53:56 AM permalink | |
| thecesspit Member since: Apr 19, 2010 Threads: 38 Posts: 3105 | Megabucks is a progressive. Besides, both machines have to be the same "type" (unless I misunderstand the rules about same manufacturer). I would suggest Mr Bluejay limits the total coin if he wants to safe guard himself (I assume there's $1 machines that have multiple lines and multi-coin per line that could make a $1 machine over $100 per spin = $200,000 coin in). I am surprised that the hypothesis here seems to be that all machines in a casino of the same base type have the same payout. "Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept through nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire, for a coup at trente-et-quarante" - Honore de Balzac, 1829 |
| November 15th, 2011 at 11:31:25 AM permalink | |
| CrystalMath Member since: May 10, 2011 Threads: 3 Posts: 474 |
I don't think it is this at all. He is wagering $1000 against $1200. Because of the variance, the player would need to find a machine that is about 2% higher in order to have a break even bet. The player can gain an advantage if player finds machines with the lowest possible variance and actually identify machines with a difference in payback. If the machines were the same return, then the player has a 50% chance of winning $1000 and a 50% chance of losing $1200. That's an expected loss of $100. It sounds like a pretty fair gamble and I'd like to see someone try... but, it wouldn't prove the player right or wrong because of the limited number of games. I heart Crystal Math. |
| November 15th, 2011 at 11:45:22 AM permalink | |
| tsmith Member since: Jan 15, 2010 Threads: 11 Posts: 95 | I would refine the rules of the challenges to say that both machines must not just be the same type as in mechanical reels vs. virtual reels, but the same exact machines, because with video slots there are secondary bonus games to consider and not all bonus games are the same; some allow the player to make choices while others simply award so many free spins. I would also specify that both players must wager the same amount on every spin because a lot of slot players have the superstition that varying the coin-in can have an effect on the outcome (I call it the "Ocean's Eleven Syndrome"). Plus, when you get into multi-line machines where you can play anywhere between 5 cents and $5 per spin, it might make a difference over the course of 2,000 or 3,000 spins if one person is betting the minimum and one is betting the maximum. For mechanical reel machines, I would specify that max coin-in be wagered every time. |
| December 10th, 2011 at 11:01:37 PM permalink | |
| MichaelBluejay Administrator Member since: Sep 17, 2010 Threads: 8 Posts: 180 | Thanks for all the thoughtful replies. After a lot of thought, and considering the comments, I've decided to just retire Slot Challenge #1. It's just a pain to try to thwart all the exploits, and no short-term test could really prove much of anything anyway. So let's focus on Challenge #2, which is to try to disprove any generic "I can win at slots" system that's being sold by hucksters. If you were constructing this challenge from scratch, how would you design it? |
| December 18th, 2011 at 1:47:15 AM permalink | |
| MichaelBluejay Administrator Member since: Sep 17, 2010 Threads: 8 Posts: 180 | (bump) |
| December 18th, 2011 at 7:55:35 AM permalink | |
| SOOPOO Member since: Aug 8, 2010 Threads: 49 Posts: 1322 | Agree that challenge 2 is beatable if after an early win you can lower your bet. Even if you stipulate the same machine, if one can switch from 5 coins to 1 coin after an early win the switch will lower the variance and make a small win more likely. As far as challenge 1, I would give yourself either better odds (his 2k versus your 1k), or even odds (your 1lk versus his 1k) with him having to have beaten you by some predetermined amount since it is only fair since he is playing the 'hot' machines. Say for 3000 spins on a dollar machine he has to be up $150 more than you... |
| January 28th, 2012 at 1:42:21 PM permalink | |
| MichaelBluejay Administrator Member since: Sep 17, 2010 Threads: 8 Posts: 180 | Okay, here's where we're at. Again, I've killed the challenge about whether higher-paying machines are located in certain areas of the casino floor, because it's too hard to write a set of rules which both makes the point and at the same time counters all the loopholes for exploits. So I'm focusing only on the challenge about whether anyone has a winning betting system. I've upped the challenge payout to $5000, and revised the rules according to the feedback I've gotten so far. Here's what I've got:
Thoughts? |
![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
