![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
Casino Ethics: Clocks
Thread Rating:
Poll
| 12 votes (66.66%) | ||
| 6 votes (33.33%) |
18 members have voted
| November 11th, 2011 at 9:35:47 AM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2047 |
Yes. Operating a business knowingly out of line with local regulation would make the lack of a clock unethical. Choosing not to post a timepiece when it is optional? A design question, a customer service question, but not an ethical one. It would be different if employees were required to claim they didn't know the time (even if they had a timepiece.) |
| November 11th, 2011 at 10:05:40 AM permalink | |
| kp Member since: Feb 28, 2011 Threads: 7 Posts: 422 |
Ethics don't change with regulation, although regulations may be put in place to enforce ethical behavior. I drive 60mph. Is that ethical? Does the ethics of driving 60mph change depending on the speed limit being 55mph or 65mph? The legality of driving 60mph changes, but does the ethics? Or is ethics solely determined by what is or is not legal?
What if a business prevented employees from knowing the time? Is there a difference between a business policy that says employees are not allowed to tell the customer the time and a business that prevents employees from knowing the time so they can not tell the customer the time? |
| November 11th, 2011 at 10:44:50 AM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2047 |
Actually, whether one obeys the law or not is an ethical decision. Choosing to obey or violate the posted speed limit is an ethical decision. Driving, in and of itself, is not an ethical decision (akin to displaying a clock). Regardless of whether limits are posted, or not, choosing to drive recklessly, or knowingly impaired, is an ethical decision. At the root of all of these decisions is a question of right and wrong. Are "right" and "wrong" relative or absolute? Answer that, and you will know if judging behaviors ethical or not is even possible.
I'm not sure it is possible for a business to "prevent" anyone from knowing the time. But if supervisors physically stopped their employees from checking with customers or the pit boss, wouldn't share the time off their watch if asked, or purposely gave incorrect information, it would be wrong. I think the question you are asking is, "Was the decision to design a casino with no clocks morally wrong?" To that I answer "no". There are lots of businesses where the time is not clearly displayed. If you want to know, just ask. |
| November 11th, 2011 at 11:30:02 AM permalink | |
| kp Member since: Feb 28, 2011 Threads: 7 Posts: 422 | I agree with breaking the law being unethical. But I also believe you can be unethical without breaking a law.
Why would that be wrong? Shouldn't a business have a right to choose to not share information with a customer? |
| November 11th, 2011 at 12:14:06 PM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2047 |
Certainly. The law only covers a few of the ethical decisions we make each day, and (hopefully) reflects a generally accepted standard of right and wrong.
|
| November 11th, 2011 at 12:23:31 PM permalink | |
| kp Member since: Feb 28, 2011 Threads: 7 Posts: 422 |
I need to know the time. I ask the pit boss for the time. He says casino policy is to not share that information. I need to know the time. I look at the clock on the wall. There isn't one because the casino manager told the interior designer that casino policy is to not share that information. One is blatant. The other is subtle. Is there an ethical difference between the two? |
| November 11th, 2011 at 1:05:16 PM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2047 |
Yes. The pit boss is actively choosing to not help you, even though he could. He is making a choice between assisting you, or following "casino policy". Unless having a clock on the wall is a legal requirement of occupancy, leaving it off (even if the hope of management is increased profit) is an amoral design choice. |
| November 11th, 2011 at 1:18:24 PM permalink | |
| Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 14, 2009 Threads: 313 Posts: 6783 | Here is my two cents. First, if the speed limit is 55, and everybody is doing 70, then I think it is a little unethical to do 55, because you are impeding traffic, and increasing the chance of an accident. There is something to be said for considering both the letter and the spirit of the law. About the clocks, and other similar discussions, I highly doubt the casinos sit around a conference table and think about subtle ways to trick the players into losing more money. They don't want anyone to miss a flight or be late for dinner. Places like casinos, bars, and nightclubs are trying to set a mood where you can leave the real world behind and enjoy yourself. Clocks are generally associated with appointments, meetings, and running errands, things you are trying to forget in a casino. If you want to know what time it is, bring a watch. It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet. |
| November 11th, 2011 at 1:36:44 PM permalink | |
| gofaster87 Member since: Mar 19, 2011 Threads: 3 Posts: 445 | ...... |
| November 11th, 2011 at 1:52:06 PM permalink | |
| kp Member since: Feb 28, 2011 Threads: 7 Posts: 422 |
|
![]() | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
