 | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
If a Casino game had 0 house edge...
| July 26th, 2011 at 6:34:46 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1302 | I love the topic name >> "If a Casino game had 0 house edge" What do you mean 'if'? I've read all kinds of stories here regarding guys playing with an ADVANTAGE/edge. Does that not mean 0% HA? Yeah, yeah I know. 5.26% and 3%......Huge difference. (lol) Bad news fellas, losing IS losing regardless of how long it takes. Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Bad news.....throwing in the towel after spending a TOTAL of 9 hours on roulette does NOT mean you can't be successful with it.
Don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 8:20:25 PM permalink | |
| AceCrAAckers Member since: Jul 12, 2011 Threads: 11 Posts: 130 | I asked my math professor this question over twenty years ago. Given a house edge is there a betting system that can guarantee a win? The answer is yes but you need to meet two conditions. 1. Have infinite amount of money. 2. Casino to accept infinite bet. With a cap on the betting and the fact that no one has infinite amount of money, one cannot overcome a HE with a betting system. It's bad luck to be superstitious. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 8:33:19 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1302 |
In your opinion, does this mean for ANY game and even if the HE is very low? Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Bad news.....throwing in the towel after spending a TOTAL of 9 hours on roulette does NOT mean you can't be successful with it.
Don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 8:39:38 PM permalink | |
| AceCrAAckers Member since: Jul 12, 2011 Threads: 11 Posts: 130 |
If there is any edge, one cannot overcome it with any betting system. Stop wasting your time thinking of one. It will be easier to discover perpetual motion machine than this. And this is not an opinion, it is a mathematical fact. It's bad luck to be superstitious. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 8:42:01 PM permalink | |
| MathExtremist Member since: Aug 31, 2010 Threads: 45 Posts: 2511 |
You can't win anything if you already have an infinite amount of money... "In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice."
-- Girolamo Cardano, 1563 |
| July 26th, 2011 at 8:43:29 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1302 |
What is it with some of you? Its HYPOTHETICAL. Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Bad news.....throwing in the towel after spending a TOTAL of 9 hours on roulette does NOT mean you can't be successful with it.
Don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 9:22:10 PM permalink | |
| pacomartin Member since: Jan 14, 2010 Threads: 544 Posts: 6164 |
Your math professor was wrong. Wine loved I deeply, dice dearly -Edgar, betrayed son of Gloucester in King Lear |
| July 26th, 2011 at 9:30:58 PM permalink | |
| AceCrAAckers Member since: Jul 12, 2011 Threads: 11 Posts: 130 |
If ever I run into him again I'll be sure to tell him that. pacomartin saying that you are wrong is all the proof I need. Just because you teach math and have a PhD doesn't mean a damn thing when pacomartin says you are wrong. It's bad luck to be superstitious. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 9:32:02 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1302 |
Oh, oh......and they're off! Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Bad news.....throwing in the towel after spending a TOTAL of 9 hours on roulette does NOT mean you can't be successful with it.
Don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 26th, 2011 at 9:40:53 PM permalink | |
| EvenBob Member since: Jul 18, 2010 Threads: 231 Posts: 6361 |
You're first mistake is asking a math person about how to win in the casino. They're very good, excellent in fact, at finding all the ways to lose. But when it comes to winning, all their knowledge holds them back from really investigating it to its fullest because they have already concluded they can't win. One casino owner to another: "It would be so much easier if we could just hit them over the head, steal their money, and throw their bodies in the creek." Al Swearengen, Deadwood |
| Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |