Thread Rating:
He would not have voluntarily left without his beloved cat.
This guy has put his life at great risk. And for what?
This is a great interview of Julian by John Pilger, dated Nov 5, before the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sbT3_9dJY4
(Let's see, that's probably what I would do if they cut off my one source of communicating to the world.)
Anyway if the US were going to illegally kill him, it would look like an accident or a health malady. Not like this.
If someone else were going to kill him, no telling.
Quote: rxwineHe probably wants people to think he is dead, thinking it will make someone press for doing something.
(Let's see, that's probably what I would do if they cut off my one source of communicating to the world.)
Anyway if the US were going to illegally kill him, it would look like an accident or a health malady. Not like this.
If someone else were going to kill him, no telling.
If you had to be on someone's kill list, whose would you LEAST want to be on?
1. United States
2. Any one else.
PS: I hope someone is feeding the cat.
But, this has to be one of the most compelling catchy thread titles I've ever seen in this joint. Despite the disappointing lack of theoretical physics speculation on problems of quantum mechanics, and suchlike:
Wikipedia: Schrödinger's cat
Quote: DrawingDead
I clicked it, but I got lost. Poor kitty.
Quote: bobbartopThere is nothing on the internet supporting that Julian Assange is alive and well. On the contrary, there's all kinds of articles saying that he is not.
Links?
Quote: ncfatcatIf he's not dead already wait till the first anti Trump revelation wikileaks makes. "Mad Dog" will send a battalion of Marines in after him. Who cares abour Diplomatic Privilege?
They say it is already compromised and under someone's (CIA's?) control. There's already a path of dead people. A few weeks ago it was in all the "regular" news. Now not so much.
Quote: ams288Links?
Ams, respectfully, I think you could find them faster than I could post them.
Quote: bobbartopAms, respectfully, I think you could find them faster than I could post them.
I probably could, but I'm curious as to which specific articles you were referring to.
Nah, don't be sorry. Because...Quote: bobbartopQuote: DrawingDead
I clicked it, but I got lost. Poor kitty.
So by getting lost, you may have saved an innocent kitty cat. Or, I guess, maybe an Assange.Quote:According to Schrödinger, the Copenhagen interpretation implies that the cat remains both alive and dead until the state is observed.
"The United Kingdom and Sweden must end the detention of Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, a United Nations panel has ruled. Not only must both governments allow him to walk from his asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, but they must respect his right to free movement and liberty and even provide him with monetary compensation for the past few years."
"The UN panel initially ruled that Assange was arbitrarily detained earlier this year, but the UK government appealed it. Having now confirmed its decision, the United Nations will expect the British government to allow Assange to walk free, without fear of arrest. It will also expect Sweden to drop the charges against him."
Status quo.
Quote: MrVWGAS about what the UN says anymore?
Nobody should, and I am very much against the UN. The UN is very much against the United States. We need to quit funding it and kick it out of this country. If they want to have a UN, ship it to Havana. It will look nice there.
On the other hand, I don't like the direction our own country is heading. We're slowly turning into a police state. As we police the world. Too much government, and too many foreign entanglements.
Julian Assange is a liberal. I'm not. But I like him anyway. He doesn't seem to be a partisan liberal, more like a conscientious liberal who wants to expose TRUTH. It takes real guts to do what he's done.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuQW0US2sJw
Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. Everyone needs friends.
Spoiler alert:
Quote: @WikiLeaksThe Obama admin/CIA is illegally funneling TOP SECRET//COMINT information to NBC for political reasons before PEOTUS even gets to read it.
WikiLeaks is upset about the leaking of sensitive information.
Oh the sweet, sweet irony!!