Godzilla (2014): “And the Academy Award for best trailers and teasers goes to the ad company who was hired by the Godzilla group for fooling millions of people into thinking the new Godzilla movie would be great!” Man, those were the best trailers I’ve ever seen for a movie that was a total, unmitigated let down; a total bore.
Based on the trailers we’re talking “Gone with the Wind” and instead we got the alternate definition of “wind.” We got a big Godzilla fart to be precise.
One of my favorite actors, Bryan Cranston (of “Breaking Bad” fame) playing Joe Brody, gave this performance: “My wife died!” He cries and blubbers. “My wife died!” He cries and blubbers. Cranston sheds more tears in two seconds in this movie than he shed in five seasons of “Breaking Bad.” Then he dies about 20 minutes into the movie.
Is Cranston worried about Godzilla as the trailers made us believe? Nope. He’s worried about something else --- things that turn out to be the two creatures Godzilla will fight in this movie called MUTOs (for Massive Unidentified Terrestrial Organisms). They are ugly and frankly the movie seems to attempt to make them as frightening as the monsters in “Cloverfield,” the best “big monster destroys a city” movie yet made.
Godzilla does enter the movie after about an hour. Yes, he is big and he is beautifully designed. We get glimpses of him here and there; with some fight scenes stretching out for a minute or less.
You know a movie is bad when you really don’t give a damn if leading and supportive characters die. Like “Jaws II” where I was actually wishing the teenagers perished, “Godzilla’s” human component had such a lack of humanity that if they died I seriously didn’t care.
David Strathaim, usually an accomplished actor, gave a performance no better than the performance of the lady seating in front of me who fell asleep. He should use his sleep walking performance as an audition for a zombie on “The Walking Dead.”
Godzilla does defeat the two dopey monsters and he does use his fire breath a couple of times. This is the best part of the movie. His flames are brilliantly handled. In fact they are like lightning. They are actually shocking to see. Of course, one wonders why he didn’t use this talent at the very beginning of his battle instead of towards the end when he was really, really tired. It would have saved him a lot of trouble.
The worst thing that happened for me was the fact that I brought my wife the Beautiful AP to the movie. I have been complaining to her for years that I go to see all the chick flicks and serious movies she wants to see but she rarely goes to the science fiction / superhero movies that I also enjoy seeing.
She gave in and saw “Iron Man 1 and 2,” “Captain America,” “The Incredible Hulk,” and “The Avengers.” She liked all of them. She didn’t like “Man of Steel” and she hated “Godzilla.” I now fear she may turn me down when I ask her on a date to see another movie in the above genres.
“Godzilla” may have screwed up a part of my marriage. I hope in the sequel (and there will be a sequel) he destroys the ad company that made those trailers!
I guess we all take different expectations into a movie, but I wasn't thinking it was going to be good as much as just fun and campy, which I think it was. Lots of destroyed buildings, the surly Japanese guy, the classic "look backwards and scream while sprinting" scenes, a couple of bad guys, and a monster that's, at times, sympathetic. The more famous actors were known to have only somewhat of a cameo, at least I knew it and I'm no insider.
It's no "King's Speech" or "Exorcist" or "Silence of the Lambs," but I don't think it's meant to be. For what it is, an entertaining trifle to stimulate nostalgia in the olds and spawn a new generation of fans, five stars.
Of course I don't know you or your wife but I do note that "Man of Steel" and "Godzilla" featured a great deal of destruction. Not that the other movies don't, but definitely less so. Maybe it crosses her "Show me more story and less buildings crashing" threshold.
I loved it.
I went in expecting a Godzilla movie, and that is what I got.
I wasn't hoping for Gone with the Wind...
I'm a monster and science fiction fan. The 1933 "King Kong" is brilliant and the 2005 "King Kong" is also terrific. "The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms" (the movie from which all "the dinosaurs destroy cities" originated) was top notch as well.
I also did not like the other monsters in "Godzilla" as they seemed tin-like.
I'll see the movie again when I can get the DVD and maybe I'll change my mind.
Quote: WizardIn the last Godzilla movie I saw there was a strange time delay in speech. Whenever anybody started to move their lips the words reached my ear about two seconds later.
That's because they spoke in Japanese! I watched part of a Godzilla marathon a few months ago...but it wasn't too long before I couldn't take it anymore.
He is 100% bad ass in the old movies.
Quote: WizardIn the last Godzilla movie I saw there was a strange time delay in speech. Whenever anybody started to move their lips the words reached my ear about two seconds later.
You must have a really really big TV room. About 0.42 miles long ?
Quote: FrankScoblete"The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms" (the movie from which all "the dinosaurs destroy cities" originated) was top notch as well.
I always figured that the original 'Godzilla' derived at least partly from the movie [movies?] based on HG Wells' "War of the Worlds" where the Martians land in the desert, then begin to approach and destroy cities/civilization. In the 50's movie I'm thinking of, the A-bomb is dropped to wipe them out, but to no avail [that had to make an impression on the Japanese]. Of course Godzilla and these various monsters prove resistant to all the latest military capabilities [but in Nippon no movie is going to have A-bombs]
I'll have to catch up on "The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms"
It's this attention to detail that makes the new Godzilla superior to the old one.
Quote: thecesspitmy home town
Horsell or Woking?
Quote: odiousgambitHorsell or Woking?
I though Horsell was part of Woking.
Quote: MoscaWe saw it this afternoon, and we sort of agree with Frank. The first 40 minutes are boring and confusing. The middle 40 minutes are muddled and unnecessary. The last 40 minutes pretty much kick ass.
Monsters 2010 R (93m) was the director's first movie before directing Godzilla. (Six years after aliens invaded Earth, a photographer is documenting a war-torn region when he's interrupted by an unexpected rescue mission. )
I thought the pacing of the movie was purely a function of it's extremely low budget. You don't see a monster until 60 minutes into a 93 minute movie. While I appreciate delayed gratification as part of story telling, it was a little on the extreme side.
Quote: odiousgambitI always figured that the original 'Godzilla' derived at least partly from the movie [movies?] based on HG Wells' "War of the Worlds" where the Martians land in the desert, then begin to approach and destroy cities/civilization. In the 50's movie I'm thinking of, the A-bomb is dropped to wipe them out, but to no avail [that had to make an impression on the Japanese]. Of course Godzilla and these various monsters prove resistant to all the latest military capabilities [but in Nippon no movie is going to have A-bombs]
I'll have to catch up on "The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms"
odious, grab a copy of Godzilla 1985.
As for the Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, it also included a scene where a cop gets devoured by the beastie. Yummy!, and might be a first.
War of the Worlds, hands down George Pal version. THEM!, also great.