Keyser
Keyser
  • Threads: 35
  • Posts: 2106
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
July 5th, 2012 at 1:11:13 PM permalink
Mosca,

I believe that's because you are focusing on the "game" of roulette, rather than people that are exploiting inefficiencies in the gaming device. There are people that play AP roulette based on a method called visual ballistics. Many of these people have their own methods, but most of them involve a form of linear regression that measures the location of the ball in relation to the position and speed of the wheel at key points during the spin. Some of the more well known player are people like Christian Kaisan, and Sir Laurance Scott. Most of these players have strong backgrounds in engineering/ mathematics.


Nobody, and I do mean nobody, has ever designed a method/system to beat the "game of roulette" and nobody ever will.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 441
  • Posts: 28575
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
July 6th, 2012 at 7:45:46 PM permalink
Quote: AverageJOE

-
Wheel signatures exist and can let you aim for the high probability area each time the dealer spin the ball.
That is physical facts and the true story about signatures.



How do you know this? I don't what a wheel signature is.

What is it?
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
buzzpaff
buzzpaff
  • Threads: 112
  • Posts: 5328
Joined: Mar 8, 2011
July 6th, 2012 at 7:47:49 PM permalink
If you look under the wheel, next to the designer's signature, are the biased numbered he has designed into the wheel.

That is why a casino will never let you see under the wheel.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 441
  • Posts: 28575
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
July 9th, 2012 at 12:28:02 PM permalink
Quote: Mosca

there will be players who will consistently win, who will win for a lifetime, and who will believe that the reason they won was because they figured out something. I believe the reality is that they got lucky.



But luck doesn't run like that. Luck is a hit and miss
thing, its not consistant. Nobody can be lucky at
gambling for a lifetime, its a mathematical impossibility.

Luck is the word we use for positive variance. If you're
playing a game with a negative expectation, the variance
looks like a sine wave, with peaks and valleys. And more
valleys than peaks. For it to remain mostly peaks for
a lifetime of playing a house edge game is not possible.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
  • Jump to: