I guess that you are right: this not the place to discuss homelessness, but I do want to state that I was not some nutcase all those years and sure did not choose such a hellish existence.Quote: Bozanyone who is homeless for a multiple year period either has Mental Health issues or has made a CHOICE to remain homeless.
While this isn’t the place to discuss homelessness, I truly believe this.
Mini thread derailment now over!!
Quote: OnceDearRecently a moderator had a video call with Karen and was quite satisfied that Nathan = the Karen that had previously been portrayed. Take that as established.
That was me. I am sure the one who posts as Nathan is the same person known as Karen who is has provided short videos and seen in the "Nathan on a bus" picture. The one I spoke with knew all kinds of trivial things Nathan has posted here, like the number of points predicated in the Super Bowl (125).
Those of you who miss Nathan can find her at other corner at DT, where she is a member in good standing.
Quote: WizardThat was me. I am sure the one who posts as Nathan is the same person known as Karen who is has provided short videos and seen in the "Nathan on a bus" picture. The one I spoke with knew all kinds of trivial things Nathan has posted here, like the number of points predicated in the Super Bowl (125).
Those of you who miss Nathan can find her at other corner at DT, where she is a member in good standing.
Except for me. Only 10 months, 12 days and 5 hours to go on my year long suspension there*
*Actually no clue, that’s a guess.
That said, I kind of miss Bluejays posts on here. He seems to come and go in spurts. An interesting life he leads, to say the least.
And I don’t think many questioned if Karen was Nathan, only if she was also other previous posters on here.
Quote: BozSo you weren’t planning a trip to meet her in Miami?
You know I was going to when I was going to visit Kentry but I couldn’t seem to get them in the same room at the same time.
1. they harrass the unwanted employee, insult them in private and in front of other employees and make their employment as miserable as possible
2. and when the employee explodes in anger,
3. the company proceeds to fire the employee because the angry explosion gives them just cause to do so.
I have seen this several times during my career. It is a thoroughly ugly and objectionable practice.
Quote: gordonm888There is a tactic that corporate America uses against a whistleblower or any employee that they wish to fire but for whom they have no righteous reason to fire:
1. they harrass the unwanted employee, insult them in private and in front of other employees and make their employment as miserable as possible
2. and when the employee explodes in anger,
3. the company proceeds to fire the employee because the angry explosion gives them just cause to do so.
I have seen this several times during my career. It is a thoroughly ugly and objectionable practice.
Yea, this is EXACTLY the same thing, lol.
Maybe “Nathan” can sue as a victim of this thoroughly ugly and objectionable practice.
Quote: gordonm888There is a tactic that corporate America uses against a whistleblower or any employee that they wish to fire but for whom they have no righteous reason to fire:
1. they harrass the unwanted employee, insult them in private and in front of other employees and make their employment as miserable as possible
2. and when the employee explodes in anger,
3. the company proceeds to fire the employee because the angry explosion gives them just cause to do so.
I have seen this several times during my career. It is a thoroughly ugly and objectionable practice.
I was actually instructed personally by a corporate manager to do this to an underling. They told me if the person is fired there will be unemployment insurance issues and payments due while if they can make the person quit they can avoid that
Yeah pretty nasty imo. I am sure the usual suspects think its good business
Quote: prozemaI'm sure someone already covered this, but I'm too lazy to read back. What is the duration of Nathan's suspension?
Nuclear