2011: Saraha casino closes
2014: Saraha re-opens as SLS
The 2014 owners invested $415 million in an effort to turn the property into a chic hangout for a younger crowd.
However, the project failed in large part due to the empty lots and mothballed buildings that surrounded it.
The SLS had been losing money since opening and was on the verge of bankruptcy,
Price tag on 2018 sale was not disclosed but SLS had $585 million of debt as of Nov 2017.
Good luck new owner!
You'll need it. :(
from my perspective, there's no reason for me to travel past the Wynn to the north end strip casinos (SLS, Circus circus, Stratosphere).
like the article says, the north end of the strip looks run down.
Wasn't there talk at one point of shutting down LV Boulevard completely and making it all pedestrian? I personally think that would be a great idea. Just have a big moving walkway down the middle, and bunch of trolleys or something. At the very least they need more of those pedestrian bridges. There should be one in front of every casino.
Moving around on the Strip is annoying.
EDIT: But specifically with SLS, they need a new name. SLS doesn't mean anything. According to that article it looks like they're considering it, or at least changing back to Sahara. I think that would help.
They said they were going to brighten up the casino floor (whatever that means).
hmm.. easiest would be to make the Monorail free if you enter from the Sahara/SLS stop.Quote: TigerWuThese casinos need to start pooling their money to create some transportation infrastructure between them.
The Strip is just too big. I think most people either stay at their casino or go 1-2 casinos to either side.
Not many people want to walk all the way down to one end or the other, and traffic is a nightmare.
I know that monorail is there, but if they expanded it and made it cheaper/free, and maybe added some free shuttles/buses up and down the Strip, these off-center casinos would get more action.
its the same price if you take it just for 1 stop or from beginning to end, right?
if not, then make exiting at the SLS stop also free.
in fact, im surprised the 2014 owner didn't try to get the city to do that?
the only way I see of SLS succeeding with that debt load is with help revitalizing the north end of the Strip.Quote: AxelWolfI was listening to NPR and they said they may take back the Sahara name if it makes sense to do so.
They said they were going to brighten up the casino floor (whatever that means).
either get the City or partner with the other 2 north end casinos (circus circus and stratosphere) to make that entire area more enticing.
spending $100M on just the SLS property wont probably work.
the previous owner spent $400M and never made a profit in the 3 years he owned it.
the other way to get customers in the door is with good paying games.
ie: full pay VP and slot areas which advertise 99% payback (and not the stupid gimmick 'UP TO 99%', meaning 1 machine in that bank of 10 slots is 99%)
but with that debt load, I don't see them able to offer that
Quote: 100xOddshmm.. easiest would be to make the Monorail free if you enter from the Sahara/SLS stop.Quote: TigerWuThese casinos need to start pooling their money to create some transportation infrastructure between them.
The Strip is just too big. I think most people either stay at their casino or go 1-2 casinos to either side.
Not many people want to walk all the way down to one end or the other, and traffic is a nightmare.
I know that monorail is there, but if they expanded it and made it cheaper/free, and maybe added some free shuttles/buses up and down the Strip, these off-center casinos would get more action.
its the same price if you take it just for 1 stop or from beginning to end, right?
if not, then make exiting at the SLS stop also free.
in fact, im surprised the 2014 owner didn't try to get the city to do that?
Why should the taxpayers of LV subsidise one casino over the others? People manage to get Downtown, get to the Boulder Strip, get to South Point. If SLS can't attract people, that's on them. Nothing prevents them or the Strat from running free shuttles. Nothing prevents them from reaching out and marketing themselves better. What genius decided to change from the much more recognizable Sahara to the SLS?
Or replace the craps tables with beer pong. (-;Quote: 100xOddsthe only way I see of SLS succeeding with that debt load is with help revitalizing the north end of the Strip.
Quote: 100xOddshmm.. easiest would be to make the Monorail free if you enter from the Sahara/SLS stop.
its the same price if you take it just for 1 stop or from beginning to end, right?
if not, then make exiting at the SLS stop also free.
in fact, im surprised the 2014 owner didn't try to get the city to do that?
The monorail is probably the easiest way to increase traffic to both SLS and Westgate, but its a private, non-profit entity, (and one that's got its own financial problems), so any discounts have to take all of them into consideration.
I think something like a rebate for playing and riding might work. Get a new rewards card and get double the standard new signup free play when you show an active monorail ticket. If you already have a card you get $XXX by showing your monorail ticket.
We are here with our monorail tickets.Quote: HullabalooThe monorail is probably the easiest way to increase traffic to both SLS and Westgate, but its a private, non-profit entity, (and one that's got its own financial problems), so any discounts have to take all of them into consideration.
I think something like a rebate for playing and riding might work. Get a new rewards card and get double the standard new signup free play when you show an active monorail ticket. If you already have a card you get $XXX by showing your monorail ticket.
The only thing that really stands out there is the bac players, but bac players will pretty much go anywhere and everywhere the game is offered. If that's the case they are probably better off going to high end strip properties, or local properties off the strip, to find a balance of comps to luxury.
Maybe they should try the sub 95% VP with 3% meters or something like that, something that nobody has that is only offered at their property.
Also, I hate you guys in this thread. I was eating some mega-spicy enchiladas while reading this, and between the bag of monorail tickets and saying it's name really fast, my sinuses are in agony.
The SLS tried to offer "youth" as its decoration theme but then found few people would venture there for mere trappings. Beach clubs and food/drink/gambling spas need customers but it just wasn't a happening place stuck out in the area of rubble and chain link fences and fleabag motels.
You have to let people travel there real cheap, let them have a reason to go there and make certain that once there, they don't regret the decision and start looking over their shoulders for lurking dangers.
Neighborhood upgrade, casino upgrade, hotel upgrade, nightclub upgrade, clientele upgrade.... its expensive and will take time.
Players may not want to "try the casino next door" but they always want to be able to do so. If the neighborhood is too dismal, no one will want to visit an oasis in the middle of nowheresville, even if the ride there is free.
Some people have it, most don't.
I've worked fairly intimately with two self made men, both of whom net worth went from near nothing to hundreds of millions of dollars. They were in very different fields but had the same message.
Give people what they want and you will be successful, but real success comes from convincing people they want what you have to offer.
Quote: rdw4potusSls may be a bad casino in a bad location. And the name may be odd. But it's a well known ultra high end hotel brand. Its not like they just picked a random meaningless name for the Vegas property. Www.slshotels.com
I was unaware of this, never heard of them before. It makes a little more sense now.
Quote: billryanI was unaware of this, never heard of them before. It makes a little more sense now.
That's kind of an issue with 'ultra high end'... they're so rare that the mass market doesn't recognize them.
Quote: billryanI've heard many times, that Circus Circus one of the most profitable properties on the strip. It has no debt and doesn't have huge chunks of it sitting vacant most of the time.
Without a doubt! In a nuclear apocolypse, all that will survive are roaches and Circus Circus.
Quote: MaxPenNow it is even more confusing with one of the towers being named W. Someone down there needs to put ZenKing in charge. He'll turn that place around in the first quarter.
Is it just something as practical as being shorthand for the West Tower?
True, but redundant.Quote: RogerKint...all that will survive are roaches and Circus Circus.
Quote: VenthusIs it just something as practical as being shorthand for the West Tower?
No. Your response is why the situation is so comical. W is supposedly some high end hotel. They bought one of the towers. There is now a big ass W on top of the SLS sign. People think the name of the whole place has changed. It should be studied in marketing class as how not to brand a property.
Where is ZenKing?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.reviewjournal.com/business/tourism/w-hotels-worldwide-logo-lights-up-las-vegas/amp/?source=images
Quote: MaxPenNo. Your response is why the situation is so comical. W is supposedly some high end hotel. They bought one of the towers. There is now a big ass W on top of the SLS sign. People think the name of the whole place has changed. It should be studied in marketing class as how not to brand a property.
Where is ZenKing?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.reviewjournal.com/business/tourism/w-hotels-worldwide-logo-lights-up-las-vegas/amp/?source=images
The W is a very well known top end brand. Much more recognizable than SLS, in my opinion. Doesn't Mandalay do the same thing? They changed The Hotel tower to another brand.
I understand it is related to the inarticulate glory of ultra-lounge nightclub identity breaking the shackles of human brain function, in which coolness was made known to the clueless by being identified with the fewest syllables. So “Pure” and “Tao” were naturally for cooler kids than “Rhumbar” and “Indigo.” Obviously, to the splendidly special little gods & godesses shambling about, unburdened of the ability to spell the word “syllable” or use it in a sentence.
Quote: billryanThe W is a very well known top end brand. Much more recognizable than SLS, in my opinion. Doesn't Mandalay do the same thing? They changed The Hotel tower to another brand.
Did you see the marquee sign. One would think the whole place is W.
Quote: MaxPenDid you see the marquee sign. One would think the whole place is W.
I don't get over that way much. I've never noticed it. I was at the convention center last week for ASD, but didn't go up to Sahara
Corporate history of SLS is just dandy if you are from Los Angeles and read the financial columns; doubt it means much if you are a Yuppie taking a vacation to Vegas.
Circus Circus in the sixties was ultra profitable. Even made money on its headline making buffet that drew zillions. Recent decade, I hear they washed an ashtray and some auditor jumped down their throats for it.
SLS tried to market themselves to Young, With It "lifestyle" types but found those people preferred the Cosmopolitan where it was more substance to the social claims.
Times change, neighborhoods come back. Stay tuned ...
Quote: RogerKintThanks to my degen gf, I ate at Cleo for the first time, last night. It was really, really good. I'm sure all the locals are sick of it by now.
Yum..yum so good. Bring me some more pitta bread please.... !! This post reminds me of Axel. He is sick of eating at Oscars. ;)
Quote: AxelWolfI was listening to NPR