Thread Rating:

Poll

4 votes (9.09%)
36 votes (81.81%)
5 votes (11.36%)

44 members have voted

100xOdds
100xOdds
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
  • Threads: 525
  • Posts: 3100
April 4th, 2021 at 3:29:14 AM permalink
Quote: sabre

No, defendants filed Anti-SLAPP motions and the cases will likely be dismissed with Postle responsible for the defendant's fees.

Postle's lawsuits have been dismissed:
https://twitter.com/JonathanLittle/status/1378136638379941888
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
DanDruff
DanDruff
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 17
Thanks for this post from:
Mission146
April 8th, 2021 at 3:47:56 AM permalink
I'm one of the defendants -- Todd Witteles.

Postle dismissed his own lawsuit "without prejudice", just 19 days before our anti-SLAPP motion.

We are proceeding to ask the court to rule that I am dismissed from the case WITH prejudice, and that Postle needs to pay my attorney's fees.

The result of this likely will not be known until April 19-20 or so.

If you'd like to hear my radio show segment about this, where I had my attorney come on and explain it, go to the 3:12:57 mark of the show. Just google "Poker Fraud Alert Radio" and look for the 4/4/21 episode.

  • Jump to: