Is this evidence you're not really a theoretical physicist? Seems like you only redefined theoretical physicist so that you can label yourself a theoretical physicist. I'm trying to take you seriously, please correct me if I'm not reading your statements as you intended.Quote: themood
Well if you're a good theoretical physicist all of your theory should lead to real-world Applications and probability of combinations. That is exactly the definition of a theoretical physicist. And no using any real scientists is out of the question their mind has been corrupted with so much bad knowledge they haven't got a clue what's really going on. I need clean clear mine's who can think independently of what the status quo dictates
How did you know that? I really didn't try anything besides a Google search and not recognizing it either. Googling came up empty for me.
Should themood just give up solving the universe because you already have, or are you in on it with themood? Are you a theoretical physicist too?
Edited: well duh 1/.012345679=81, but that's not really the answer. I wanted to know where it came from. Why does he think it's somehow significant? My guess, it has something to do with a mental breakdown until I hear more.
Well, I'm not sure if I'm just not coming across clearly or stating my case in a manner that you can understand. I was hoping that somebody familiar with this system or these particular numbers 0.01234567901 would like to use their talents in a positive way. And reap the benefits from anything that they add to our conclusions.
However, it is clear that most of the responses to the post are drunk and childish individuals who are bent on not adding anything to society. If you would like to seriously be involved and you have any understanding about using the system of math based on that number. I would like to hear from you. It is a real chance for you to work with real scientists real physicist on a worthwhile project. If you don't want to or don't have the ability please don't respond with childish Comments.
I'm stumped as to why he posted this in this thread to begin with and not create a thread discussing his topic.