allinriverking
allinriverking
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 3, 2010
March 20th, 2018 at 12:04:44 AM permalink
I have a question for blackjack players. What do you believe is the worst starting hands to have in blackjack?
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 20th, 2018 at 12:20:54 AM permalink
16 vs 10.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
March 20th, 2018 at 5:16:35 AM permalink
Quote: billryan

16 vs 10.



True.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Mission146
Mission146
  • Threads: 142
  • Posts: 16832
Joined: May 15, 2012
March 20th, 2018 at 5:43:29 AM permalink
Deleted
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/gripes/11182-pet-peeves/120/#post815219
allinriverking
allinriverking
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 3, 2010
March 20th, 2018 at 10:48:16 PM permalink
Quote: Mission146

Deleted


Interested in your deleted choice, Mission....
ZenKinG
ZenKinG
  • Threads: 56
  • Posts: 1443
Joined: May 3, 2016
March 20th, 2018 at 10:56:51 PM permalink
If surrwnder is offered, there's no one particular hand that is the worst. How about a thread alternative? What is the most interesting hand that makes everyone shake their heads?

Mine would be a7 v 10, hit it and get a hard 16 and stand on TC 0 and higher. That leaves everyone completely puzzled.
Any private business open to the PUBLIC (ie. droned out casinos) cannot have a criminal trespass enforced against an individual without GOOD CAUSE (Disruptive or Disorderly conduct). You will never go to prison for being thrown out of a casino for legal advantage play and then returning because it's simply unconstitutional 'as applied' to the individual. 'As applied' constitutional issues must FIRST be raised in DISTRICT COURT (trial court) to have it thrown out. You CANNOT raise it on APPEAL This is the best kept secret in the world of casinos not just in Vegas but everywhere in the country. Thank me later.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
March 20th, 2018 at 11:53:19 PM permalink
Quote: ZenKinG

If surrwnder is offered, there's no one particular hand that is the worst. How about a thread alternative? What is the most interesting hand that makes everyone shake their heads?

Mine would be a7 v 10, hit it and get a hard 16 and stand on TC 0 and higher. That leaves everyone completely puzzled.



I don't know about shaking one's head, ZenKing, but I find this is an "interesting" hand:

Single deck, video blackjack, 6-card-charlie, hit a four-card soft 19 versus Ten.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
March 21st, 2018 at 12:05:53 AM permalink
Quote: allinriverking

I have a question for blackjack players. What do you believe is the worst starting hands to have in blackjack?



No surrender: 9-7 versus T
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
Greasyjohn
Greasyjohn
  • Threads: 135
  • Posts: 2178
Joined: Dec 8, 2013
March 21st, 2018 at 3:58:15 AM permalink
I was once playing at full table at Four Queens some years ago. It was a pitch SD game. The guy playing third base stands on 5,3 or some similar such under-10 hand. When the dealer busts the guy reveals his hand totaling eight to the table and says, with great enthusiasm,
"I saved the table!"
Mission146
Mission146
  • Threads: 142
  • Posts: 16832
Joined: May 15, 2012
March 21st, 2018 at 4:36:54 AM permalink
Quote: allinriverking

Interested in your deleted choice, Mission....



I just said any non-Natural hand against a Dealer Natural. After I said that, I decided it might not qualify as a starting hand for your purposes because you never get to make a decision.

Although on, "No Peek," Blackjack, especially that in which any other bets are not returned, my point definitely holds. The only split that appears to be made against a dealer Ace or Ten is a player with a Pair of Aces, on any number of decks. In any event, all of your hands automatically will lose. That split is also only made against a dealer ten.

The only caveat is that not only does the dealer not peek, but sometimes, does not even take a hole card. The result is that the first card that completes the natural is drawn. Although, sometimes the dealer does take a hole card and just doesn't look at it...so all players would lose to the natural + doubles and splits. Should only ever Split A's against a Ten, though, and never double anything against A/10.
Last edited by: Mission146 on Mar 21, 2018
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/gripes/11182-pet-peeves/120/#post815219
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
Thanked by
bobbartop
March 21st, 2018 at 8:17:05 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

True.



Actually, I believe that 16 vs A is worse than 16 vs. 10.

Also, a multi-card 16 is worse than a a two card 16, such as (5,5,5,A) vs 10.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
Thanked by
bobbartopMission146
March 21st, 2018 at 9:14:52 AM permalink
You don't start with four cards. You start with two cards and a dealer card.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
Thanked by
allinriverking
March 21st, 2018 at 11:06:01 AM permalink
Quote: billryan

You don't start with four cards. You start with two cards and a dealer card.



Okay. Here are the worst 10 starting hands (I believe). I assume 8 decks, the dealer hits a soft 17, and has already peeked, and that Double After Splitting is allowed.

16 (10-6) vs A: EV = - 54.05 %
16 (9-7) vs A: EV = - 53.95
16 (9-7) vs 10: EV = - 53.65
16 (10-6) vs 10: EV = - 53.60
17 (10-7) vs A: EV = - 51.62

17 (9-8) vs A: EV = - 51.27 %
15 (10-5) vs A: EV = - 50.89
15 (9-6) vs A: EV = - 50.82
16 (9-7) vs 9: EV = - 50.61
16 (10-6) vs 9: EV = - 50.57

Some might be surprised to see that a 17 vs A is weaker than a 15 vs A. This is due to "Hit a S17 rule." If the dealer stands on S17, then a 17 vs A is slighter better then a 15 vs A.

If DAS is not allowed, the 16 (8-8) vs. Ace is the fifth weakest hand with EV = -52.61.
Last edited by: gordonm888 on Mar 21, 2018
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
BedWetterBetter
BedWetterBetter
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 608
Joined: Oct 20, 2012
March 21st, 2018 at 11:06:18 AM permalink
I always find it funny when someone will hit a Hard 15 without hesitation and the second they get an Ace, they wave it off as if they've got no shot to win by taking a hit?

Like 16 is soooo much worse than 15 and they were so sure the next card was a 6? They're definitely not counting or aware that standing on a multiple card 16 is sometimes better strategy than hitting. So I always found it humorous when I see this scenario.

I think it's just the Stigma that 16 is the absolute worst hand to start with and hitting 16 can only result in a loss!
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 21st, 2018 at 12:20:32 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

You don't start with four cards. You start with two cards and a dealer card.



Of course, consistent with your statement above, it is equally as valid to consider hands before the dealer peeks at the downcard.

Again, assuming 8 decks, dealer hits S17, DAS and dealer has not yet peeked, I believe these are the worst 10 starting hands

16 (9-7) vs A: EV = - 66.50 %
16 (10-6) vs A: EV = - 66.49%
17 (9-8) vs A: EV = - 66.37
17 (10-7) vs A: EV = - 66.36
15 (9-6) vs A: EV = - 66.06

15 (10-5) vs A: EV = - 65.99 %
15 (8-7) vs A: EV = - 65.77%
14 (7-7) vs A: EV = - 63.80
14 (8-6) vs A: EV = - 63.42
14 (9-5) vs A: EV = - 63.34

All of the 10 worst hands are versus a dealer ace. In fact, 13 vs A is worse than 16 vs 10.
Last edited by: gordonm888 on Mar 21, 2018
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 21st, 2018 at 1:38:41 PM permalink
Bill Ryan did say that 16 vs 10 was the worst hand starting hand in BJ and the Wizard agreed with him. To be fair to the both of them, let's take a look at the 10 worst hands in the traditional Blackjack game that started it all: Single Deck, Dealer Stands on S17, Dealer has peeked and there is no BJ.

Get ready for a wild list!

16 (9-7) vs 10: EV = - 51.20 %
15 (9-6) vs 10: EV = - 50.98 %
14 (7-7) vs 10: EV = - 50.97 %
16 (10-6) vs A: EV = - 50.88 %
16 (10-6) vs 10: EV = - 50.69 %

15 (10-5) vs 10: EV = - 50.11 %
15 (10-5) vs A: EV = - 49.87 %
15 (9-6) vs A: EV = - 49.59 %
16 (9-7) vs A: EV = - 49.55
14 (7-7) vs A: EV = - 49.47

Here, the two variations of "16 vs 10" are the worst hand and the fifth worst hand.

15 (9-6) vs 10 is the 2nd worst hand, because with a 15 the player would really like to get a 6 when he hits, and one of the four sixes is already in player's hand.

The 3rd worst hand in this list is the dreadful "7-7 pair vs 10" -a hand which is a hot mess. Here, the player's best move is to stand rather than hit. The two sevens in the players hand greatly reduce the chance of player getting a 7 if he hits - and player would really like to get a 7 and make 21 to beat the dealer's likely 20 (whenever the dealer's down card is another 10).

Indeed, if you average over all 16s (both 10-6 and 9-7), then 16 vs 10 has an EV of -50.79% and 16 vs A has an EV = -50.61; seemingly, making 16 vs 10 the worst hand in traditional single deck BJ.

But, not so fast! In a traditional BJ strategy table, a pair of 7s vs 10 would get its own square -and its EV = -50.97% making it even worse than 16 vs 10 and qualifying it as the single worst "hand" in Single Deck Blackjack. So, maybe its a matter of definition.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 21st, 2018 at 1:50:15 PM permalink
Quote: BedWetterBetter

I always find it funny when someone will hit a Hard 15 without hesitation and the second they get an Ace, they wave it off as if they've got no shot to win by taking a hit?

Like 16 is soooo much worse than 15 and they were so sure the next card was a 6? They're definitely not counting or aware that standing on a multiple card 16 is sometimes better strategy than hitting. So I always found it humorous when I see this scenario.

I think it's just the Stigma that 16 is the absolute worst hand to start with and hitting 16 can only result in a loss!



Well, I'm about to surprise you.

When player hits a T-5 vs 10 and gets an ace he has a 16 (T-5-A) vs 10. With 8 decks, here are the numbers: Hit: EV = - 54.10% and Stand = - 53.99%. So, Stand is indeed the right move. This is because the 5 in the player's hand is exactly what the player would like to get when hitting a 16 - and the absence of even one 5 from the 8-deck shoe makes a difference. However, if the original two-card 15 was a 9-6 and you draw an Ace to make 16, HIT is the best option. For "16(9-6-A) vs 10" Hit = - 53.66% and Stand = - 54.02%

In single deck BJ, it is even more striking.

16 (T-5-A) vs 10: Hit = - 54.96% and Stand = - 53.60%. So Stand, Baby, Stand!
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 21st, 2018 at 2:00:26 PM permalink
I'm not sure why you are stipulating the DJ has no BJ. We don't know that. All we can do is compare the EV of our two cards and the dealers upcard. Anytime the dealers upcard is a ten, there is a possibility of him having a BJ.
A two card 16 vs a dealer ten has an EV of -.53, not .51.
https://www.888casino.com/blog/blackjack-strategy/the-best-and-worst-starting-hands-in-blackjack
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 21st, 2018 at 2:04:41 PM permalink
Quote: bobbartop

I don't know about shaking one's head, ZenKing, but I find this is an "interesting" hand:

Single deck, video blackjack, 6-card-charlie, hit a four-card soft 19 versus Ten.



You want an interesting result. Hit a six card Charlie on a single deck VBJ machine.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 21st, 2018 at 2:06:53 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

I'm not sure why you are stipulating the DJ has no BJ. We don't know that. All we can do is compare the EV of our two cards and the dealers upcard. Anytime the dealers upcard is a ten, there is a possibility of him having a BJ.



I did it two ways. Scroll up three posts: I looked at the EV's of all hands assuming the dealer has not yet checked for BJ when dealer has a 10 or A upcard. The worst hand for player was 9-7 vs A.

Scroll up 5 posts: This addresses the worst 10 hands after dealer has peeked and does not have a BJ. These EVs apply to the traditional way of looking at BJ strategy - with the obvious caveat that the worst hands after dealer peeks are really "Anything vs. BJ."
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 21st, 2018 at 2:10:42 PM permalink
I just think you are overcomplicating things. That's all.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
March 21st, 2018 at 3:04:29 PM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Bill Ryan did say that 16 vs 10 was the worst hand starting hand in BJ and the Wizard agreed with him. To be fair to the both of them, ....




To be fair, I read the question as "worst starting hands", plural, so I did not think Billryan said it was the worst hand, just one of the worst hands. And then you came along and added 16 vs Ace. Altogether, excellent thread so far. A fun read.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
March 21st, 2018 at 3:12:26 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

You want an interesting result. Hit a six card Charlie on a single deck VBJ machine.



If I had known this was to develop into such a good thread as it was with yours and Gordon's posts, I would not have contaminated it with something different, just kinda responding to ZenKing.

Still, though, I don't follow you on this particular comment. Care to explain it for simple me? Be patient.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
March 21st, 2018 at 3:21:45 PM permalink
Quote: gordonm888


But, not so fast! In a traditional BJ strategy table, a pair of 7s vs 10 would get its own square -and its EV = -50.97% making it even worse than 16 vs 10 and qualifying it as the single worst "hand" in Single Deck Blackjack. So, maybe its a matter of definition.



Appreciate all your additions to this thread. Reading your comments here regarding 77 v T, it reminded me of one of my favorite discussions, the "Key Card Concept" that Sklansky dedicated a chapter to in his 'Getting The Best of It'. Some pretty cool reading.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 21st, 2018 at 4:19:48 PM permalink
VBJ machines say a six card Charlie is a winner, but the game doesn't automatically end with your six cards.
On these machines, an 8,3, ten is 21 and your hand is done. An 8,2,Ace is also 21 but as it is a soft hand you need to hit stand before the game progresses.
When you get a six card( non hard 21) Charlie, it appears like you have an option to take a seventh card. Hit the hit button and see what happens. Don't say you weren't warned.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
Thanked by
allinriverking
March 21st, 2018 at 4:40:19 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

VBJ machines say a six card Charlie is a winner, but the game doesn't automatically end with your six cards.
On these machines, an 8,3, ten is 21 and your hand is done. An 8,2,Ace is also 21 but as it is a soft hand you need to hit stand before the game progresses.
When you get a six card( non hard 21) Charlie, it appears like you have an option to take a seventh card. Hit the hit button and see what happens. Don't say you weren't warned.



Ok, I see. Thanks. But we're talking apples and oranges, and on the apples that I've played, six cards is a winner, period, game over. Primarily IGT Game Kings.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
allinriverking
allinriverking
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 3, 2010
March 21st, 2018 at 6:12:05 PM permalink
Thank you everyone for your thoughts. I was thinking any hands that have a starting total of 12-16, when the dealer's upcard isn't a 2 through 6 card are pretty bad starting hands.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5005
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 22nd, 2018 at 8:38:33 AM permalink
Yes. That is a basic concept of Blackjack that is important to understand. Playing a stiff hand, 12-16, is always an unfavorable situation and dealer cards in the range of 7-A are more formidable than small cards in the range of 2-6.

Surprisingly, there's an exception. A 12vs2 or 12vs3 are somewhat worse than a 12vs7. Therefore, when you have a 12, you should prefer to face a 7 rather than a 2 or a 3.

Hit 12vs2 EV = - 25.26 %
Hit 12vs3 EV = - 23.23
Stand 12vs4 EV = - 20.59
Stand 12vs5 EV = - 16.29
Stand 12vs6 EV = - 12.14

Hit 12vs7 EV = - 21.27 %
Hit 12vs8 EV = - 27.19
Hit 12vs9 EV = - 34.05
Hit 12vs10 EV = - 37.70
Hit 12vsA EV = - 38.36
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
Lucca3927
Lucca3927
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 128
Joined: Aug 5, 2017
March 22nd, 2018 at 10:04:13 AM permalink
When the dealer deals himself a Blackjack.
"I should have bet black." - Winston Churchill .
allinriverking
allinriverking
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 3, 2010
March 22nd, 2018 at 12:03:25 PM permalink
Quote: Lucca3927

When the dealer deals himself a Blackjack.


Nice.....
allinriverking
allinriverking
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 3, 2010
March 22nd, 2018 at 12:08:12 PM permalink
Only if there was a variation of Blackjack, in which a player will never have a starting hand of 12 to 16. And this game would have a player advantage of almost 26% on the blackjack bet. Although there would be a additional bet that would be a forced bet of equal amount, with a house advantage of almost 32%, given a overall house advantage of 3.0%. Oh and throw in a sidebet with a 4.72% h.e., with a hit frequency of around just under 5%....
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 22nd, 2018 at 12:19:23 PM permalink
Quote: allinriverking

Only if there was a variation of Blackjack, in which a player will never have a starting hand of 12 to 16. And this game would have a player advantage of almost 26% on the blackjack bet. Although there would be a additional bet that would be a forced bet of equal amount, with a house advantage of almost 32%, given a overall house advantage of 3.0%. Oh and throw in a sidebet with a 4.72% h.e., with a hit frequency of around just under 5%....



How about we play a game where you get no cards, but have 18 every hand. I follow dealer rules and hit all 16s and soft 17s. Sound good? Sign up now and I'll throw in an extra 1/2 point, so any hand I have 19 or less you win.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
allinriverking
allinriverking
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 3, 2010
March 22nd, 2018 at 1:04:41 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

How about we play a game where you get no cards, but have 18 every hand. I follow dealer rules and hit all 16s and soft 17s. Sound good? Sign up now and I'll throw in an extra 1/2 point, so any hand I have 19 or less you win.


Doesn't sound very fun, I don't get any decisions...
Kellynbnf
Kellynbnf
  • Threads: 15
  • Posts: 198
Joined: May 5, 2010
March 22nd, 2018 at 1:57:20 PM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Yes. That is a basic concept of Blackjack that is important to understand. Playing a stiff hand, 12-16, is always an unfavorable situation and dealer cards in the range of 7-A are more formidable than small cards in the range of 2-6.

Surprisingly, there's an exception. A 12vs2 or 12vs3 are somewhat worse than a 12vs7. Therefore, when you have a 12, you should prefer to face a 7 rather than a 2 or a 3.

Hit 12vs2 EV = - 25.26 %
Hit 12vs3 EV = - 23.23
Stand 12vs4 EV = - 20.59
Stand 12vs5 EV = - 16.29
Stand 12vs6 EV = - 12.14

Hit 12vs7 EV = - 21.27 %
Hit 12vs8 EV = - 27.19
Hit 12vs9 EV = - 34.05
Hit 12vs10 EV = - 37.70
Hit 12vsA EV = - 38.36



In fact, if you had a choice of whether the dealer would start with a 2 or a 7 every time, it'd be better to pick the 7. It's true that with a 7 the dealer would be less likely to bust than with a 2, but the odds of the dealer making a really good hand are lower (since a ten in the hole would give the house a pat 17).
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
March 22nd, 2018 at 2:13:16 PM permalink
Quote: allinriverking

Doesn't sound very fun, I don't get any decisions...



If you want to have fun, play video games. If you want to play BJ, pick up a book or six.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
  • Jump to: