arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 13th, 2015 at 9:49:13 PM permalink
I'm interested in founding a company whose core function is to hire salaried APs. There are multiple tax-related and other advantages I see:
- I, as an employee, would not have to declare myself to be a professional gambler and would not have to add gambling winnings (or losses) to my tax statement (since any amount I win is company income, not personal --- PLEASE correct me if this isn't right).
- No self-employment tax
- All employees wouldn't have to show ridiculously high AGIs, placing them in a high tax bracket -- AND they don't need to worry about states who don't allow gambling losses to be deducted.
- Multiple CTRs? not a problem -- easily explained -- it's in the core nature of the company's business for its employees to handle large amounts of cash.
- The company could issue "bonuses" at the end of the year that would ensure zero income.
- Employees would get W2s. That means the company would need to withhold a certain amount (social security, fed tax, medicare), and the employee would be responsible for his liability depending on if he/she got additional income (from a day job?) and would be placed in the tax bracket befitting the amount of money he actually made.
- No need to explain the bank teller where the hell all those bennies came from.
- Much easier to play higher stakes with larger buy-ins (front-money accounts would be linked to the company, rather than the employee's personal bank account).
- The company can carryover losses from one year to the next (which is only true for an individual if he declares himself a professional gambler)

Thoughts? what disadvantages come to mind? I'm not looking for views on how tricky team play can be and how you have to trust each other etc. -- I'm really just interested in the accounting aspects.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 10:02:31 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun


- The company can carryover losses from one year to the next (which is only true for an individual if he declares himself a professional gambler)

.

Link please.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
RS
RS
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 8626
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
February 13th, 2015 at 10:07:20 PM permalink
I think it is a lot more difficult that you think. If this isn't stuff that you already know a lot about....well, it's almost like waking up this morning saying, "I want to become the President of the United States, what do I have to do?" Granted, it isn't that radical, but if you don't know much about the subject to begin with or aren't already in a proper position, it'll be real tough.

I don't know how much you do know or don't know about that kinda stuff. I mean no disrespect.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 10:31:24 PM permalink
Double taxes on winnings. The company would have to pay tax on winnings (earnings) and then the employee would have to pay tax on his salary/bonuses.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 10:38:56 PM permalink
I can't wait to see where you can carry over wins and losses to the next years.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 13th, 2015 at 10:39:07 PM permalink
@Axel: gambling loss would be an operational loss, and companies (as well as individuals who are professional gamblers from the IRS's perspective) are allowed to carryover such losses from one fiscal year to the next. Link 1 , Link 2 , Link 3

@RS: No disrespect taken. I have decent startup experience, although I've never founded my own. I'm trying to see if people can come up with downsides to the general idea of gambling through a company rather than as an individual.
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 13th, 2015 at 10:41:00 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj

Double taxes on winnings. The company would have to pay tax on winnings (earnings) and then the employee would have to pay tax on his salary/bonuses.



this came up I think in a few older threads -- the idea is to offset any company income (earnings) with a fitting payroll expense (employee bonus) so that the company's true income is zero.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 10:47:07 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

@Axel: gambling loss would be an operational loss, and companies (as well as individuals who are professional gamblers from the IRS's perspective) are allowed to carryover such losses from one fiscal year to the next.



Where did you come up with this part that individuals filing as professional gamblers are allowed to carryover losses??
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 10:51:43 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

this came up I think in a few older threads -- the idea is to offset any company income (earnings) with a fitting payroll expense (employee bonus) so that the company's true income is zero.



I know little to nothing about business taxes (I file as an individual), but I don't think it works like that. I think the earnings would be taxed at 2 different levels.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

@Axel: gambling loss would be an operational loss, and companies (as well as individuals who are professional gamblers from the IRS's perspective) are allowed to carryover such losses from one fiscal year to the next. Link 1 , Link 2 , Link 3

@RS: No disrespect taken. I have decent startup experience, although I've never founded my own. I'm trying to see if people can come up with downsides to the general idea of gambling through a company rather than as an individual.

I'm not sure this will fly with gambling. You can get away with a number of things for a while I guess, I'm not a tax person so I'm not sure exactly. Do you know of anyone reputable that has done it like that? Many have filed as legitimate gambling businesses, however I never have known anyone that has successfully carried over wins and losses. I'm very interested in knowing the facts on this.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 13th, 2015 at 10:59:19 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj

Where did you come up with this part that individuals filing as professional gamblers are allowed to carryover losses??


I'm wrong about individuals -- in my mind I was thinking about deducting gambling losses which some states don't allow individuals to do unless they are professional gamblers. Individuals can't carry over losses as far as I know. Sorry KJ - hope I didn't make the heart skip a beat there...
sc15
sc15
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 594
Joined: Sep 28, 2014
February 13th, 2015 at 11:01:29 PM permalink
You're going to set up a front money account under a corporation name who's sole business is AP play?

You gonna have all team members draw from the same account too? LOL.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 11:04:59 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

I'm wrong about individuals -- in my mind I was thinking about deducting gambling losses which some states don't allow individuals to do unless they are professional gamblers. Individuals can't carry over losses as far as I know. Sorry KJ - hope I didn't make the heart skip a beat there...



No problem. I wish what you thought were true. I wish a gambler could carry over losses (which hasn't been an issue for me yet, as I haven't have a losing year) and I wish we could do some sort of averaging from year to year (this would have come in handy)
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 13th, 2015 at 11:09:09 PM permalink
Quote: sc15

You're going to set up a front money account under a corporation name who's sole business is AP play?

You gonna have all team members draw from the same account too? LOL.



Yes, and I plan to name the company "Beat Blackjack By Counting Cards, Inc."
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
February 13th, 2015 at 11:24:56 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

Yes, and I plan to name the company "Beat Blackjack By Counting Cards, Inc."

You will need team shirts and jackets.

A few teams of the past have came up with some creative names to jab fun at the casinos.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
sc15
sc15
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 594
Joined: Sep 28, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 1:25:36 AM permalink
Well, there's 1 thing that's definitely a fact.

Corporations have way more rights and flexibility when it comes to taxes than an individual.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 121
  • Posts: 10941
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
February 14th, 2015 at 4:59:24 AM permalink
I think you could do it, legally, accounting wise, etc... I highly doubt it would work, as the lowly paid employees will be ripping you off from the get go.
vendman1
vendman1
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Mar 12, 2012
February 14th, 2015 at 6:00:23 AM permalink
Quote: kewlj

I know little to nothing about business taxes (I file as an individual), but I don't think it works like that. I think the earnings would be taxed at 2 different levels.



While I think the OP's scheme is doomed. He is right that the corporation he would set up could legally have zero net income by paying it's employees more. Not to get all CPA on everyone but essentially corporate entities pay taxes on net income, that is revenue minus expenses. IF your revenue is say 1M per year, and your expenses are say 900K per year. You could reduce your net income to zero by paying out the remaining 100K to employees as bonuses. Or buying a piece of equipment, or whatever. It's obviously a little more complicated than that. There are lots of different types of corp. entities for one thing. How and when you file taxes varies greatly among those types. Every state has it's own unique set of regulatory issues as well. But at it's most basic level yes, you could avoid double taxation by structuring your costs so that the corp. has zero (or near zero, net income). It some states the first 50K of net income on some classes of corp. is not subject to corporate tax anyway. The corporation would be responsible for matching taxes on income it pays it's employees SS, medicare and such. But that is an expense that comes off net income anyway.

Having said all that. No way this idea would work. The legal and tax implications are the least of the problems here.
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 14th, 2015 at 7:05:40 AM permalink
Quote: vendman1

Having said all that. No way this idea would work. The legal and tax implications are the least of the problems here.



I certainly want to believe you -- can you share specific hurdles that come to mind?
darkoz
darkoz 
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
February 14th, 2015 at 9:15:26 AM permalink
Why would you want to have a company that makes no money (to the IRS)?

No one operates a business year after year that makes no money. Eventually, they would go out of business.

I would show some profit, even if it was for only 40K to show that the business was viable. To do otherwise, would raise a red flag if I was an employee of the IRS.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
beachbumbabs
beachbumbabs
  • Threads: 100
  • Posts: 14260
Joined: May 21, 2013
February 14th, 2015 at 11:30:52 AM permalink
Quote: darkoz

Why would you want to have a company that makes no money (to the IRS)?

No one operates a business year after year that makes no money. Eventually, they would go out of business.

I would show some profit, even if it was for only 40K to show that the business was viable. To do otherwise, would raise a red flag if I was an employee of the IRS.



You can show a net operating loss in any 2 of 5 years you're in business, then you have to start showing some sort of profit or the IRS starts questioning what you're doing. They don't accept a structure that leads to no taxable money in some direction, though it's acceptable in a small corporation (S corp) for them to take their taxes from the shareholders (at their individual rates) rather than the company itself. Paying your employees more than the company earns does not keep you out of trouble, especially if any owners or shareholders are also listed as employees.

Tried (casually) to find the relevant paragraphs of the IRS code and didn't. I suggest anyone considering doing it consult a tax accountant; they generally consider themselves your confidential consultant.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 7471
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 11:49:14 AM permalink
Quote: darkoz

No one operates a business year after year that makes no money.



LOL. That is so so wrong. There are many companies that make no taxable profits ( or at least negligible profit ) . Certainly true in the UK, and i well expect it's true in the US.
http://americasmarkets.usatoday.com/2014/08/12/20-big-profitable-u-s-companies-paid-0-taxes/
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
vendman1
vendman1
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Mar 12, 2012
February 14th, 2015 at 11:58:35 AM permalink
Lets just say there is a difference between a business that makes no profit, and a business that shows no profit for tax purposes. I'm not talking about tax fraud either. I mean legitimate ways to minimize the taxes a business pays. There is a whole profession built around this idea. They're called tax accountants. I've run a business for almost 20 years. I rarely show a profit on paper. I've done nothing illegal. But my business is 10 times the size it was in 1996 when I started it. That's where the money goes growth and reinvestment, corporations big and small do it all the time. Reinvestment can be in capital improvments, real estate, equipment, salary and bonuses, all most anything that can be justified as a legitimate business expense. You just have to know the rules and how to play by them. It's not easy. But it's not that hard either. Also, to be frank it helps that the average IRS employee doesn't understand their own rules, how could they. The rules are beyond complex. If you ask the IRS a business related tax question 3 times...you are likely to get three different answers. I'm not exaggerating, I'm speaking from experience.

To the OP if you want some specific advice to your situation I'd be happy to give it for free, PM me if you want, but I'm not an expert. I still think it's probably more trouble than it's worth to start a company with AP gaming as it's core business. It didn't work (at least long term) for the guys at MIT and they tried it several times.
darkoz
darkoz 
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
February 14th, 2015 at 1:04:21 PM permalink
Yea, I was thinking about the MIT guys too.

From what I understand, it was their tax filings that helped lead Griffin to them. They were able to get the prospectus and other company info that listed all the players. Not exactly what an AP team would want.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
February 14th, 2015 at 1:07:50 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

I'm interested in founding a company whose core function is to hire salaried APs. There are multiple tax-related and other advantages I see:
1. I, as an employee, would not have to declare myself to be a professional gambler and would not have to add gambling winnings (or losses) to my tax statement (since any amount I win is company income, not personal --- PLEASE correct me if this isn't right).
2. No self-employment tax
3. All employees wouldn't have to show ridiculously high AGIs, placing them in a high tax bracket -- AND they don't need to worry about states who don't allow gambling losses to be deducted.
4. Multiple CTRs? not a problem -- easily explained -- it's in the core nature of the company's business for its employees to handle large amounts of cash.
5. The company could issue "bonuses" at the end of the year that would ensure zero income.
6. Employees would get W2s. That means the company would need to withhold a certain amount (social security, fed tax, medicare), and the employee would be responsible for his liability depending on if he/she got additional income (from a day job?) and would be placed in the tax bracket befitting the amount of money he actually made.
7. No need to explain the bank teller where the hell all those bennies came from.
8. Much easier to play higher stakes with larger buy-ins (front-money accounts would be linked to the company, rather than the employee's personal bank account).
9. The company can carryover losses from one year to the next (which is only true for an individual if he declares himself a professional gambler)

Thoughts? what disadvantages come to mind? I'm not looking for views on how tricky team play can be and how you have to trust each other etc. -- I'm really just interested in the accounting aspects.



Replaced your dashes with numbers...

General question: What corporate structure are you planning in using? S-Corp?

1. that's probably true, at least if table games are your only play. But any W2G winnings have to list an individual, who would then probably want to document off-setting losses
2. I think this one nets to 0. There's not a penalty for being self-employed, it's just that the same person pays both halves of SSI and Medicare taxes. In an enclosed system like a small company, I think you're indifferent whether the company pays a 6.5% tax on your behalf and issues a W2 or pays you 6.5% more and issues you a 1099.
3. Probably true. But I think the company would have this concern. If the business conducted is gambling and losses can't be netted off, then the company is going to be deemed to have income in those states regardless of any bonus netting scheme.
4. Wasn't a concern anyway, no need to explain. Would the employees have needed to explain their CTRs to someone if they were playing for themselves? I'd be more worried about the bank(s) and their reaction to all the cash transactions in and out of the company account.
5. This is common enough. In an S-Corp the employees are shareholders and the company's profit or loss flows through to them directly (the company pays no taxes directly). So you could either do distributions for corporate taxes, or you could just bonus the crap out of them. Note: bonuses are instantaneous events, so you'd really want to do it at the end of the year - not in calendar January.
6. The company would also need to withhold state, county, and local taxes depending on where the employees live and "work."
7. Not sure that's true. Bank reporting requirements are more strict than casino reporting requirements, and the source of the cash is less evident in a bank than in a casino. An all-cash national company would almost certainly raise a sea of red-flags.
8. Does this really work? How does the casino determine that I have the right to access the company's funds? With my own bank account, they check ID, voided check, SSN, etc. With a corporate account they...?
9. How are you going to determine and document your losses? Corporate audits are WAY more common than individual audits. When the IRS comes knocking, you...?
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
waasnoday
waasnoday
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 162
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
February 14th, 2015 at 4:09:11 PM permalink
beachbumbabs, vendman1, and rdw4potus all have some very good points. One other item to consider is that FINCen is looking to increase the Title 31 reporting requirements for casinos. What I have heard is casinos will need to be more aware of the source of their player's funds. This is nothing the casinos want but if they want to stay in business they have to follow the Title 31 requirements. If this comes about then you may want to consider the casino's response when they find out their player is being funded by an AP company.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 441
  • Posts: 28575
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
February 14th, 2015 at 4:31:32 PM permalink
Quote: vendman1

While I think the OP's scheme is doomed..



How would you belong to such a company
if you're an AP and don't want anybody
to know who you are. Casinos would get
wind of it and make the first 'AP gang'
arrest when they got ahold of the members
list.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
rsactuary
rsactuary
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 2315
Joined: Sep 6, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 4:49:39 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

- I, as an employee, would not have to declare myself to be a professional gambler and would not have to add gambling winnings (or losses) to my tax statement (since any amount I win is company income, not personal --- PLEASE correct me if this isn't right).



If you win a taxable jackpot, I don't think they are going to accept company ID for your W2-G. They are going to make it out in your personal name and SSN.
Sonuvabish
Sonuvabish
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 1342
Joined: Feb 5, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 5:59:19 PM permalink
I don't think there's anything illegal about operating a shell company. It might throw up red flags, it might get audited. But if it's avoiding taxes and not evading them, it's not ultimately going to be a problem. There is no legal requirement that a corporation be profitable. I had cooked up a similar scheme that I never went thru with, involving having the place I worked for pay my corporation instead of me. The corp would also take in money through AP play. The corp would pay me an income, enough for living expenses. Other money would be retained by the corp, and I could take busines deductions before declaring the net income. In that way, I would qualify for Medicaid; free health insurance and no Obama tax. As I said, didn't follow thru nor talked to my CPA.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5478
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 6:04:30 PM permalink
Quote: rsactuary

I don't think they are going to accept company ID for your W2-G.



IRS Form 5754.

The problem with that is that it's the exact opposite of camo. As soon as you fill out the form and hand it to the casino, they know you work for an AP company. As soon as they know you work for an AP company, I suspect your play will be discontinued.
May the cards fall in your favor.
Sonuvabish
Sonuvabish
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 1342
Joined: Feb 5, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 6:10:45 PM permalink
Quote: Dieter

IRS Form 5754.

The problem with that is that it's the exact opposite of camo. As soon as you fill out the form and hand it to the casino, they know you work for an AP company. As soon as they know you work for an AP company, I suspect your play will be discontinued.



You're a corporate officer, who owns the corp. What would prevent you from declaring it on the corp's return? Your name and social are on the business tax form, I'd imagine.
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 14th, 2015 at 6:28:46 PM permalink
These are all excellent thoughts. Let's assume no W2-Gs for the time being (ie, only payouts less than 300:1). Bish -- how much more can you tell me about your devilish scheme?
Sonuvabish
Sonuvabish
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 1342
Joined: Feb 5, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 7:04:20 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

These are all excellent thoughts. Let's assume no W2-Gs for the time being (ie, only payouts less than 300:1). Bish -- how much more can you tell me about your devilish scheme?



Never went thru with it, not much to tell. I did plan on talking to my CPA and having him do everything for me if it was workable, I would never just do it on my own and hope I wasn't breaking the law or hope I wasn't going to owe a ton in taxes. I worked for a family business, which is why I would have been able to convince them hire my corporation instead of paying me; I doubt this would work in most employer/worker relationships. I also wanted to avoid taxes on gambling, without filing a schedule C. The main thrust of my plan was to reduce my income to avoid paying for health insurance and avoid any associated penalties. I ended up paying the 1% which was small (smaller than it would cost to set all this up, no doubt--not to mention the work in maintaining it), and for this year, insurance isn't a problem. In future years, as the penalty increases, depending on whether I have insurance paid for or not, this plan may be revisited.
sc15
sc15
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 594
Joined: Sep 28, 2014
February 14th, 2015 at 7:24:10 PM permalink
Setting up a corporation for the purposes of AP play so that you can have more tax flexibility or even things like group health insurance are definitely doable.

But letting the casino know in any way that you're playing on behalf of a corporation is going to get you 86ed fast.

So you can forget about using the company's tax ID To CTR or collect a slot machine payoff, or using a company bank account to apply for credit/front money.
vendman1
vendman1
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Mar 12, 2012
February 14th, 2015 at 7:31:48 PM permalink
Quote: sc15

Setting up a corporation for the purposes of AP play so that you can have more tax flexibility or even things like group health insurance are definitely doable.

But letting the casino know in any way that you're playing on behalf of a corporation is going to get you 86ed fast.

So you can forget about using the company's tax ID To CTR or collect a slot machine payoff, or using a company bank account to apply for credit/front money.



These are just some of the reasons I thought the idea was doomed from the start. Good points all.

Some others:

1. Anyone that has run a small business will tell you that finding good help is the hardest part. This would really be true here. If you hire novice AP's, once they figure out the ropes...what's to keep them from going out on their own. I'd have a hard time seeing a veteran successful AP wanting to join. Why? he's got it figured out.

2. Cash business. Proper tracking of cash in and out, in this situation would be nearly impossible. What's to keep an "employee" from putting the occasional purple chip in his pocket. Nothing I can see.

3. Overhead. If you are based anywhere but Vegas (and probably then too). You'd have to travel some to spread around the action. With a larger group this is going to eat into already thin margins.

I'm just getting warmed up. But my bourbon is calling so nighty nite.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
February 14th, 2015 at 7:33:06 PM permalink
As I stated earlier, I am not that knowledgeable in this field, which is why I hire a gambling tax expert, I was referred to by other AP's. But it is my understanding that while a few professional gamblers set up some kind of LLC or s-corp, most of us file as individuals filing as professional gamblers, because this is the method that is beneficial to most. If it were as easy and beneficial as arcticfun is making it out to be or hoping that it is....then everyone would be filing this way.

In addition, as professional gamblers, I think we are already scrutinized more than most by the IRS. I myself have not been audited yet, but I did receive some sort of "pre-audit information inquiry" requesting additional information last spring. My tax guy responded with the requested info and I have heard no more. Do we want to do things that are going to send up more red flags. I look at it much the same as playing blackjack. I want to draw as little attention as possible.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 441
  • Posts: 28575
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
February 14th, 2015 at 7:40:07 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj

I myself have not been audited yet, but I did receive some sort of "pre-audit information inquiry" requesting additional information last spring.



Oh, it's coming if you got a pre audit
info inquiry. The IRS moves at glacial
speed, especially now that they're
short handed. They don't send those
requests for fun, some computer
noticed you and put you on an audit
list.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
February 14th, 2015 at 7:47:26 PM permalink
Quote: EvenBob

Oh, it's coming if you got a pre audit
info inquiry. The IRS moves at glacial
speed, especially now that they're
short handed. They don't send those
requests for fun, some computer
noticed you and put you on an audit
list.



That's fine too. I have nothing to hide. Just would prefer not to waste my time.
Brewfangrb
Brewfangrb
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 48
Joined: Sep 4, 2014
February 15th, 2015 at 12:23:28 AM permalink
Quote: vendman1

These are just some of the reasons I thought the idea was doomed from the start. Good points all.

Some others:

1. Anyone that has run a small business will tell you that finding good help is the hardest part. This would really be true here. If you hire novice AP's, once they figure out the ropes...what's to keep them from going out on their own. I'd have a hard time seeing a veteran successful AP wanting to join. Why? he's got it figured out.

2. Cash business. Proper tracking of cash in and out, in this situation would be nearly impossible. What's to keep an "employee" from putting the occasional purple chip in his pocket. Nothing I can see.

3. Overhead. If you are based anywhere but Vegas (and probably then too). You'd have to travel some to spread around the action. With a larger group this is going to eat into already thin margins.

I'm just getting warmed up. But my bourbon is calling so nighty nite.



I agree and think #2 is by far, the biggest problem (although there are probably lots of others that are bigger but I haven't even thought of yet). You send out the AP employee on his own, he's good at and wins consistently. He says "Yup, up $2500 for the session", you have no way to know he was actually up $3000 and just kept $500." Even if these were people you could inherently trust (and personally, I know MAYBE 5 people I could inherently trust in something like this--and none of them come close to being APs---most don't even gamble), why would they do this?

I don't mean to be discouraging to the OP. I actually get what he's thinking here and I like the idea. But beyond the logistics, I don't see how you actually make it "work".
Sonuvabish
Sonuvabish
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 1342
Joined: Feb 5, 2014
February 15th, 2015 at 3:03:25 AM permalink
My suggestion made sense (don"t know if it works, untested) because the goal was to reduce personal income and qualify for Obama benefits/avoid Obama penalties. No one is doing that previously because there was no incentive to do so before last year, assuming it works. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to hire AP's in general, in my opinion. But if you are going to, having a corporation seems no worse than hiring as an individual. As for W2Gs and CTRs, I don't know of any reason a person can't act as an agent of a corporation, without disclosing that relationhip to the payor. You file two returns as a business owner; your info isn't absent from the business form. If tax info is absent from one, on that return a tax pro is going to make a reference to the other return.

Edit: I just looked this up. You can't assign the income to the S-corp from a W2G. Looks OK with a sole-proprietorship. Seems like you could just reduce your income from the S-corp by any w2g winnings. CTRs are not taxable, and there would be no ramifications for not disclosing business info. Don't see a problem, unless youre a serial jackpot winner.
waasnoday
waasnoday
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 162
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
February 15th, 2015 at 2:16:14 PM permalink
For the present casinos are not being required to determine the source of their players' funds but you may want to check out this Reuters article. Sorry for it not being linked properly.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/columns-blogs/inside-gaming/casinos-shudder-over-possible-federal-requirement-divulge-source-high

Now if you are under the CTR limit I do not think FINCen will require fund source knowledge but if you will be gambling at or above the CTR level then this article may be of some concern.

On a side note there is debate within the IRS on treatment of winnings from free play promotional credits. A trainer at a recent seminar we sent our Revenue Audit crew too did state that we needed to track all winnings from free play promotional credit and any winnings at and over $600 would need to have a W-2G issued. We requested more information on this and received a response that this was not yet the case but that it was being debated within the IRS.
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 15th, 2015 at 2:32:18 PM permalink
Based on all of this info, it still looks like it may be advantageous to use a corp even if I were to be the only employee. The benefits are: an end-of-year AGI that reflects only dayjob income, thus placing me in a much more appropriate tax bracket; stupid MA state tax law not allowing for gambling losses is bypassed; ability to claim reasonable expenses related to the gambling business; all the while the final tax liability isn't increased.
Baccaratfrom79
Baccaratfrom79
  • Threads: 58
  • Posts: 741
Joined: Jan 12, 2015
February 15th, 2015 at 4:30:40 PM permalink
Quote: sc15

Setting up a corporation for the purposes of AP play so that you can have more tax flexibility or even things like group health insurance are definitely doable.

But letting the casino know in any way that you're playing on behalf of a corporation is going to get you 86ed fast.

So you can forget about using the company's tax ID To CTR or collect a slot machine payoff, or using a company bank account to apply for credit/front money.



As far as the Company/Corporate bank account to send in Front Money, I have done this for years and years, C.P./Bellagio/Mirage/Wynn/Planet Ho and more. AC and CT to most properties. There is absolutely no problem in send FM out of a Corporation or LLC account. It is referenced on the incoming bank transfer the players name and players reference number as well. On the books of my company, I take it as travel expense/entertainment and at times payroll, all of no concern to the casinos of course.

As far as credit, I do know for a fact most properties will consider your company bank account if you are a legitimate officer of the company with bank signing privileges that they can verify. The paperwork for most properties says, "personal and business bank accounts" within their terminology on issuing credit (which in all reality is re-paying the casino with a check you pre-authorize and they will draft (ACH) from your listed account, no later than 30 days if you lose, etc.)
Bac79=Hazardous Material and Chemical person correcting other's mistakes. Non AP'er, I can't count cards, low intelligence. Sprinkles magical dust on the cards. Has a lucky monkey. Baby also has a green one. Sum it up: "It's okay just blame me, it's all my fault"! ( No one believes me--so I chose to stop posting)
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
February 15th, 2015 at 6:07:45 PM permalink
Quote: darkoz

Yea, I was thinking about the MIT guys too.

From what I understand, it was their tax filings that helped lead Griffin to them. They were able to get the prospectus and other company info that listed all the players. Not exactly what an AP team would want.

I thought it was the fact they all had similar address.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
Sonuvabish
Sonuvabish
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 1342
Joined: Feb 5, 2014
February 15th, 2015 at 7:15:19 PM permalink
Quote: AxelWolf

I thought it was the fact they all had similar address.



Agreed. They all had similar addresses then they found them together in a yearbook. Had nothing to do with taxes. I'm not so sure I want Joe Nobody accessing whatever information he wants from the government regarding random citizens.
sc15
sc15
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 594
Joined: Sep 28, 2014
February 15th, 2015 at 8:57:02 PM permalink
Quote: Baccaratfrom79

As far as the Company/Corporate bank account to send in Front Money, I have done this for years and years, C.P./Bellagio/Mirage/Wynn/Planet Ho and more. AC and CT to most properties. There is absolutely no problem in send FM out of a Corporation or LLC account. It is referenced on the incoming bank transfer the players name and players reference number as well. On the books of my company, I take it as travel expense/entertainment and at times payroll, all of no concern to the casinos of course.

As far as credit, I do know for a fact most properties will consider your company bank account if you are a legitimate officer of the company with bank signing privileges that they can verify. The paperwork for most properties says, "personal and business bank accounts" within their terminology on issuing credit (which in all reality is re-paying the casino with a check you pre-authorize and they will draft (ACH) from your listed account, no later than 30 days if you lose, etc.)



Yeah, but you're a sucker who's sending money from a random corporate/LLC account. The casino has no concerns where the money's coming from.

The situation's completely different when an APer is sending money from a corporation that's KNOWN to be linked to APers. After the first 'employee' gets backed off, how quickly do you think word is going to spread that they're playing on behalf of a-to-p corporation?
darkoz
darkoz 
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
February 15th, 2015 at 10:18:38 PM permalink
Quote: Sonuvabish

Agreed. They all had similar addresses then they found them together in a yearbook. Had nothing to do with taxes. I'm not so sure I want Joe Nobody accessing whatever information he wants from the government regarding random citizens.



I'm going by the MIT documentary for Breaking Vegas.

At 01:11 they discuss how the faces were located in the yearbook AND then they discovered strategic investment literature which broke down their entire business strategy.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
February 16th, 2015 at 12:33:03 PM permalink
After doing a little more research, S-Corp, sole prop, or even LLC would work for a single person -- an immediate advantage is that income flows through (keyword "income", not revenue and expenses separately) to the eventual taxpayer so your AGI reflects only your *net* winnings. Consequence: lower tax bracket, no Roth-IRA contribution limits (unless you already earn 120k or more), and others...
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 17th, 2015 at 11:51:51 AM permalink
Quote: kewlj

No problem. I wish what you thought were true. I wish a gambler could carry over losses (which hasn't been an issue for me yet, as I haven't have a losing year) and I wish we could do some sort of averaging from year to year (this would have come in handy)


You do file using Schedule C, right?
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 17th, 2015 at 12:53:27 PM permalink
Quote: vendman1

1. Anyone that has run a small business will tell you that finding good help is the hardest part. This would really be true here. If you hire novice AP's, once they figure out the ropes...what's to keep them from going out on their own. I'd have a hard time seeing a veteran successful AP wanting to join. Why? he's got it figured out.


I can answer this one. If you're not a full-time AP, the taxes suck (due to not being able to net out winnings). So as long as you are being compensated fairly, this would be an attractive option to me.

But for a full time AP, the benefits start to look not that great, I agree.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
  • Jump to: