I had a hypothetical thought scenario about paying people to sign up for the self exclusion list in a state, if they had achieved the highest tier at a casino. Just imagine the tippity top people at a casino all legally barred from entering a particular casino. Those who would refuse would have more value if the others left as well. Would the casino have recourse against the payer for destroying their business? That's what Im wondering. Ignoring gaming would reverse the exclusions on request, you would throw in a contract violation for that, and profit.
There is a solution to every problem. Admitting defeat is the hardest solution.
Let 2017 be da best.