darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 18th, 2016 at 5:41:19 PM permalink
Thought this was interesting.

I know in America chips are extremely hard to counterfeit. Seems like something is either different or fishy here with this case in Monaco.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3370148/British-gamblers-jailed-Monaco-casino-scam-cashed-fake-chips-allowed-2million-made.html
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
April 18th, 2016 at 5:45:45 PM permalink
I think I would do 18 months for 2 mil
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 18th, 2016 at 6:26:07 PM permalink
what's strange about the case, just from that brief report, are:

- they didn't make the chips, they were available @ 10 a piece. how come nobody else was using them or was caught using them?

- the 3 guys were put on VIP/player list and were given comps. don't they track VIP buy-ins and winnings?

- why were they allowed to keep the other winnings?
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11596
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
April 18th, 2016 at 6:45:23 PM permalink
Quote: andysif



- why were they allowed to keep the other winnings?



Probably because the casino couldn't prove that in the previous sessions they used the fake chips.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 18th, 2016 at 7:03:28 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

Probably because the casino couldn't prove that in the previous sessions they used the fake chips.



i would speculate there is probably a law somewhere that says that if you were proven to have commit a fraud against a casino, they can forfeit all your previous winnings, even if they can't prove it.

and thats only if they don't have proofs, but in practice they should have tapes that shows their buy-in, sessions and cash outs. if they consistently cash out more than their buy-ins + winnings, then thats the proof.
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11596
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
April 18th, 2016 at 7:27:18 PM permalink
Quote: andysif

i would speculate there is probably a law somewhere that says that if you were proven to have commit a fraud against a casino, they can forfeit all your previous winnings, even if they can't prove it.



Definitely no laws like this in the U.S. but obviously I don't know the laws in all jurisdictions.

Quote: andysif

and thats only if they don't have proofs, but in practice they should have tapes that shows their buy-in, sessions and cash outs. if they consistently cash out more than their buy-ins + winnings, then thats the proof.



You are probably giving surveillance a lot more credit than they deserve. Many places only keep the recordings for 30 to 90 days unless they have a reason to keep it longer. I can't wait to hear the details of this because clearly there is more to it. For the authorities to say it was ingenious makes it clear to me that it wasn't as simple as we think.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 18th, 2016 at 7:42:58 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

Definitely no laws like this in the U.S. but obviously I don't know the laws in all jurisdictions.



You are probably giving surveillance a lot more credit than they deserve. Many places only keep the recordings for 30 to 90 days unless they have a reason to keep it longer. I can't wait to hear the details of this because clearly there is more to it. For the authorities to say it was ingenious makes it clear to me that it wasn't as simple as we think.



While i have no doubt that's what they do, I find it very hard to understand, given that nowadays everything are stored in computers.
How much is a 10T hard disc? Is probably worth less than 1 hand in some VIP room.
Its not like in the 90's when you have to reuse the tape or something.
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 18th, 2016 at 7:55:43 PM permalink
Quote: andysif

While i have no doubt that's what they do, I find it very hard to understand, given that nowadays everything are stored in computers.
How much is a 10T hard disc? Is probably worth less than 1 hand in some VIP room.
Its not like in the 90's when you have to reuse the tape or something.



I think you underestimate the amount of storage space that would be needed.

High definition images from approx. 1500 cameras running 24 hours a day - I don't know what the terabytes would look like but begin adding up the number of hard drives and physical storage space you would need to hold them and then there is the record keeping and documentation to organize that.

When I worked in Hollywood, part of my job involved the tracking of digital information from film sources and just having a hundred hours from one or two cameras became a dedicated chore.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 18th, 2016 at 8:23:34 PM permalink
Quote: darkoz

I think you underestimate the amount of storage space that would be needed.

High definition images from approx. 1500 cameras running 24 hours a day - I don't know what the terabytes would look like but begin adding up the number of hard drives and physical storage space you would need to hold them and then there is the record keeping and documentation to organize that.

When I worked in Hollywood, part of my job involved the tracking of digital information from film sources and just having a hundred hours from one or two cameras became a dedicated chore.



just a rough estimate, from my exp watching porn on the internet.
1 hour approx = 1 G
1500 cameras running 24 hrs, lets call it 40T per day. HD cost ranges from around 25-50 per T, so that would be 1000-2000 per day.
while not exactly cheap for individuals or small enterprise, 1000-2000 a day is hardly anything for a casino.
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 18th, 2016 at 9:00:18 PM permalink
Quote: andysif

just a rough estimate, from my exp watching porn on the internet.
1 hour approx = 1 G
1500 cameras running 24 hrs, lets call it 40T per day. HD cost ranges from around 25-50 per T, so that would be 1000-2000 per day.
while not exactly cheap for individuals or small enterprise, 1000-2000 a day is hardly anything for a casino.



You are not factoring in the storage of the storage.

The hard drives store the images - you also have to store the physical hard drives somewhere.

40T on hard drives kept for years aren't going to be inside the surveillance room. So now you have to have a storage facility that keeps the drives. The drives can't simply be thrown on the shelf. If the whole purpose is to retrieve the images from specific cameras then you need a dedicated system for compiling where everything is been placed on the shelf.

Of course, this is exactly the way Hollywood film vaults work. I have experience with them. So, there are a lot of associated costs with storage of digital images that go beyond just the cost of terabytes.

Casinos generally don't consider their footage worth anything except as evidence in a specific case (Hollywood studios see value in the footage they are storing) so I don't see any casino going to the trouble of doing all that.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 18th, 2016 at 9:37:20 PM permalink
Quote: darkoz

You are not factoring in the storage of the storage.

The hard drives store the images - you also have to store the physical hard drives somewhere.

40T on hard drives kept for years aren't going to be inside the surveillance room. So now you have to have a storage facility that keeps the drives. The drives can't simply be thrown on the shelf. If the whole purpose is to retrieve the images from specific cameras then you need a dedicated system for compiling where everything is been placed on the shelf.

Of course, this is exactly the way Hollywood film vaults work. I have experience with them. So, there are a lot of associated costs with storage of digital images that go beyond just the cost of terabytes.

Casinos generally don't consider their footage worth anything except as evidence in a specific case (Hollywood studios see value in the footage they are storing) so I don't see any casino going to the trouble of doing all that.


well, yes and no.

while that is the cost you have to bear if you are doing it yourself, I think lots of tech company are willing to set up some cloud services that do it for you. Tried Google. Just around 1500/mth for 40T.

(don't know if i am getting it wrong. it's like 30 times cheaper than doing it yourself ??)
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 18th, 2016 at 9:47:55 PM permalink
Quote: andysif

well, yes and no.

while that is the cost you have to bear if you are doing it yourself, I think lots of tech company are willing to set up some cloud services that do it for you. Tried Google. Just around 1500/mth for 40T.

(don't know if i am getting it wrong. it's like 30 times cheaper than doing it yourself ??)



That' a huge cost.

You came up with 40T based on 1500 cameras running 24 hours so that's one day of footage.

You're saying 40T cost around 1500/mth. So, $1500 X 365 (that's 24 hrs footage which equals 40T at $1500 per month) = $547,500

Over half a million for the storage of say, every day, from last years footage. Wait - you said $1500 per month, right, so now multiply $547,500 by 12 months.

Hmm, and you keep adding a new day to that, I don't think the casinos will tolerate that.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 18th, 2016 at 9:53:35 PM permalink
Or to make the math a bit easier,

40T is stored at $1500 per month. That's the footage from one day.

For the year, that's $1500 x 12 = $18,000 just to store the footage from a single day for the entire year.

$18,000 x 365 = $6,570,000 to store all the footage from 1500 cameras taking 24 hrs surveillance for every day from last year on the cloud for just one 12 month period.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 18th, 2016 at 10:07:12 PM permalink
Quote: darkoz

Or to make the math a bit easier,

40T is stored at $1500 per month. That's the footage from one day.

For the year, that's $1500 x 12 = $18,000 just to store the footage from a single day for the entire year.

$18,000 x 365 = $6,570,000 to store all the footage from 1500 cameras taking 24 hrs surveillance for every day from last year on the cloud for just one 12 month period.



you are right. i forgot about the accumulation of every day.
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11596
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
April 19th, 2016 at 8:23:32 AM permalink
One other factor. Companies do not want the footage unless they believe it is beneficial to them. Once you believe the video doesn't contain anything you want, you get rid of it for potential liability reasons. What if two years later an employee files a lawsuit against you and claims for example sexual harassment. Do you want to have to go through and turn over all that video to potentially be used against you?.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 19th, 2016 at 8:44:19 PM permalink
OK, so surveillance tape doesn't work

but back to the article, how can management let 3 mil of counterfeit chips went thru and not notice ?

shouldn't chip count be done periodically? or is 3 mil just "too small" to notice?
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 26th, 2016 at 6:47:29 PM permalink
Okay, guys I have the complete info on how this went down. It's courtesy Richard Marcus' website.

This is a perfect example of what happens when a reporter unfamiliar with gambling tries to write a story.

So, the article says fake "counterfeit" chips were purchased for $10 and then exchanged at the Monaco casino as $1,000 denominations. Totally confusing how this could happen as most of us know.

So, what actually happened was the cheats "brought in" (not brought) the chips of a color at a roulette table assigning them $10 denomination. They ratholed a chunk of those and colored out.

Then, a confederate who had the chips went to the table an hour or so later and requested the same color but assigning them $1,000 denomination which apparently was allowed at this casino.

As the article says, they were comped heavily (obviously the high roller was) all the while he was sneaking in the ratholed chips with $990 profit per chip.

The article says they didn't have to pay the entire amount back and that may be because legit gambling was occurring (the high roller needed to make bets as part of his cover) so perhaps that had something to do with that.

However, this is NOT a counterfeiting scheme as first reported.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
andysif
andysif
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 433
Joined: Aug 8, 2011
April 26th, 2016 at 8:31:09 PM permalink
Quote: darkoz


Then, a confederate who had the chips went to the table an hour or so later and requested the same color but assigning them $1,000 denomination which apparently was allowed at this casino.



is this normal practice at other casino? i would assume not.

I wonder how long had this been going on. Same age old question: when you find something as lucrative as this, do you take a little bit everyday for as long as possible or hit it big time once and flee.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
April 26th, 2016 at 8:36:54 PM permalink
This type of scam has been around for a long time.
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11596
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
April 26th, 2016 at 8:38:14 PM permalink
Darkoz, thanks for the clarification. I believe this is an old scam that I have read about before at Roulette.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11419
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
April 26th, 2016 at 8:58:52 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

Darkoz, thanks for the clarification. I believe this is an old scam that I have read about before at Roulette.



It is an old scam. Richard Marcus was surprised the casino in Monaco was unprepared for it but that's probably why they were targeted.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
Mobcasinos
Mobcasinos
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 62
Joined: Mar 6, 2016
April 28th, 2016 at 4:39:42 AM permalink
Wow even if they are jailed for cashing a fake chips they still manage to take home 2 million. Out smarting a casino is so hard but for them they just bought a 10 euro chip and boom they successfully scam the casino. But for this incident the casino has the greater fault. They should be able to detect if the chip is real or fake, it's part of their internal security since it involves money.
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13885
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
April 28th, 2016 at 4:43:50 AM permalink
Quote: GWAE

I think I would do 18 months for 2 mil



Prison in Monaco? Probably nicer than my house.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
NokTang
NokTang
  • Threads: 56
  • Posts: 1314
Joined: Aug 15, 2011
September 7th, 2016 at 5:18:45 AM permalink
Quote: darkoz


So, what actually happened was the cheats "brought in" (not brought) the chips of a color at a roulette table assigning them $10 denomination. They ratholed a chunk of those and colored out.

Then, a confederate who had the chips went to the table an hour or so later and requested the same color but assigning them $1,000 denomination which apparently was allowed at this casino.
.



Seems totally impossible. It's too stupid to even imagine. I think you/he/she means bought in for let's say red colored roulette chips given a $10. per chip value. Then kept some of them when changing back for cash chips. Then later, (an hour!), the same red colored chips are now $1000. each as a high roller bought in and wanted red etc.. Could have been a different(higher limit) table? Slips in five or ten of the earlier rat holed red chips and like that, for a year or two, gains over a million dollars/euros. Just seems far to simple. There would have been an excessive number of red colored chips in the chip bank at a different table for starters. Or of course, a shortage at the first table which had to be noticed? Oh well. Almost a funny story.
HeyMrDJ
HeyMrDJ
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 101
Joined: May 29, 2015
September 7th, 2016 at 7:38:40 AM permalink
Quote: NokTang

Seems totally impossible. It's too stupid to even imagine. I think you/he/she means bought in for let's say red colored roulette chips given a $10. per chip value. Then kept some of them when changing back for cash chips. Then later, (an hour!), the same red colored chips are now $1000. each as a high roller bought in and wanted red etc.. Could have been a different(higher limit) table? Slips in five or ten of the earlier rat holed red chips and like that, for a year or two, gains over a million dollars/euros. Just seems far to simple. There would have been an excessive number of red colored chips in the chip bank at a different table for starters. Or of course, a shortage at the first table which had to be noticed? Oh well. Almost a funny story.



I think you are making it more complex than it was.

They buy-in on a table for $10 per chip, 3 of them, each a different colour. They each rat hole 5 chips.

The hi-roller goes over to the table, buys in for $1000 a chip and gets assigned a colour where he has the matching colour. Boom, you're up $5k instantly. IF the colour doesn't match, you make a couple of low variance bets and walk away. A smart team would wait until the only colour not in play was one they had available. $2.7m with +$5k sessions is only 540 sessions. No reason they wouldnt get 3-5 sessions in over a 25 hour period.
Guess who peed in my Cheerios? Romes did...
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
September 7th, 2016 at 10:04:24 AM permalink
They would have to pocket 20 of each colour (otherwise there would be an incomplete stack when the first player(s) cashed in). The other thing is whether, in Monaco, they use cash chips at [French] Roulette rather than each player having their own colour at American Roulette.
NokTang
NokTang
  • Threads: 56
  • Posts: 1314
Joined: Aug 15, 2011
September 7th, 2016 at 3:49:13 PM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

They would have to pocket 20 of each colour (otherwise there would be an incomplete stack when the first player(s) cashed in). The other thing is whether, in Monaco, they use cash chips at [French] Roulette rather than each player having their own colour at American Roulette.



The incomplete(or extra) stack was my point as well.

In French Roulette there is only one zero. I don't think there is any other difference? I've played at a single zero/French table elsewhere and they had color chips for each player. Never in fact seen a roulette table without colors.
NokTang
NokTang
  • Threads: 56
  • Posts: 1314
Joined: Aug 15, 2011
September 7th, 2016 at 3:52:10 PM permalink
Quote: HeyMrDJ

I think you are making it more complex than it was.

They buy-in on a table for $10 per chip, 3 of them, each a different colour. They each rat hole 5 chips.

The hi-roller goes over to the table, buys in for $1000 a chip and gets assigned a colour where he has the matching colour. Boom, you're up $5k instantly. IF the colour doesn't match, you make a couple of low variance bets and walk away. A smart team would wait until the only colour not in play was one they had available. $2.7m with +$5k sessions is only 540 sessions. No reason they wouldnt get 3-5 sessions in over a 25 hour period.



I think...worldwide...you can pick your color from what's available. However, to avoid suspicion perhaps they allowed the dealer to pick the color for him/them. You get away with it the first time, then the second...well you get better and bolder I'm sure. Usually doesn't take a year to detect such a scam but here we have proof it did...
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
September 8th, 2016 at 7:54:54 AM permalink
Quote: NokTang

I think...worldwide...you can pick your color....

Not at French Roulette - essentially they use roulette-only cash chips. The one shown was used for Trente et Quarante when I went many years ago. They use larger valued ones for roulette.
NokTang
NokTang
  • Threads: 56
  • Posts: 1314
Joined: Aug 15, 2011
September 8th, 2016 at 4:22:21 PM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

Not at French Roulette - essentially they use roulette-only cash chips. The one shown was used for Trente et Quarante when I went many years ago. They use larger valued ones for roulette.



So without different colors, how do they know which player to pay?
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
September 9th, 2016 at 2:26:35 AM permalink
I've not actually played so am not sure, but it does seem to have more staff and croupiers often place the bets for players or watch the bets being placed.
CyrusV
CyrusV
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 103
Joined: Aug 8, 2015
September 9th, 2016 at 3:29:12 AM permalink
I know of 2 casinos hit by counterfeit chips. One in Oz got done by fake $500 chips manufactured in China, so many were produced they had to permanently take them out of circulation . Closer to home, somebody took a load of £5 chips and using nail varnish (I think) painted them black to resemble £25 chips (same size and weigh), managing to infiltrate a good fair few on busy tables. It took a while for the cash desk to notice a sharp increase in "ponies" that brought the scam to an end.
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
September 9th, 2016 at 5:38:44 AM permalink
Most counterfeit chip schemes involve 'illegals who can't involve the IRS' selling discounted chips to player out of range of security cameras.

Or else its boxed high level chips that are worked in to the "inventory" where auditors merely count the boxes.
NokTang
NokTang
  • Threads: 56
  • Posts: 1314
Joined: Aug 15, 2011
September 9th, 2016 at 6:20:10 PM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff


Or else its boxed high level chips that are worked in to the "inventory" where auditors merely count the boxes.



So you have say 100 boxes of $500.usd chips and someone on the inside works in one box of call it $5.usd chips into the box and the switch isn't discovered for a long time(if ever)?
  • Jump to: