Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard.
Here are my reasons why and my promise of support.

Okay, a question for......

Page 6 of 7« First<34567>
July 31st, 2011 at 6:57:01 PM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Nov 11, 2009
Threads: 218
Posts: 7274
Quote: SOOPOO
To summarize, I am a man of math and science. Its how I make a living. It adds order to my world. Your claims which I know to be false are fun for me to expose.


Stop.Feeding.The.Troll.
This space is closed for remodeling
July 31st, 2011 at 7:14:44 PM permalink
EvenBob
Member since: Jul 18, 2010
Threads: 231
Posts: 6398
Quote: SOOPOO
Your claims which I know to be false are fun for me to expose.


Where did you expose his claims?
One casino owner to another: "It would be so much easier if we could just hit them over the head, steal their money, and throw their bodies in the creek." Al Swearengen, Deadwood
July 31st, 2011 at 8:18:37 PM permalink
mrjjj
Member since: Sep 4, 2010
Threads: 62
Posts: 1304
Quote: EvenBob
Where did you expose his claims?


I've asked a few questions on this thread and a couple others, never got answers. Of course the 'answer me please' RULE is not the same for every member.

Ken
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it. Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:19:30 PM permalink
Keyser
Member since: Apr 16, 2010
Threads: 19
Posts: 578
Mr. Jjj.,

Surely you understand why we think you're being absurd. You come on to this board and make some outrageous claims about your winning system and then refuse to offer a shred of mathematical proof/physics as to why it should work. When we press you, all you can say is that you win more than we do or that you bought half of Italian Restaurant with your winnings (cough).

You really need to visit the website wizardofodds.com to read about roulette systems. The Wizard does a great job explaining why roulette systems/methods like yours don't work.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:31:57 PM permalink
mrjjj
Member since: Sep 4, 2010
Threads: 62
Posts: 1304
Quote: Keyser
Mr. Jjj.,

Surely you understand why we think you're being absurd. You come on to this board and make some outrageous claims about your winning system and then refuse to offer a shred of mathematical proof/physics as to why it should work. When we press you, all you can say is that you win more than we do or that you bought half of Italian Restaurant with your winnings (cough).

You really need to visit the website wizardofodds.com to read about roulette systems. The Wizard does a great job explaining why roulette systems/methods like yours don't work.


"You come on to this board and make some outrageous claims about your winning system" >>> I dont play a system. Can you point out these OUTRAGEOUS 'claims' for us? (he won't do that folks, just watch).

"offer a shred of mathematical proof/physics as to why it should work" >>> Still waiting on you cupcake. Where is your proof that YOU do well with AP (cough)? That usually quiets him down for a while. (lol)

"that you bought half of Italian Restaurant with your winnings" >>> Please quote correctly. I said 80% (est.) of winnings. Jealous? Good, you should be. And you have what......for your net winnings? New shoes and socks? (LMFAO) Maybe you bought a new kitty cat?

Ken
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it. Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:43:27 PM permalink
Keyser
Member since: Apr 16, 2010
Threads: 19
Posts: 578
Quote: Mrjjj
Please quote correctly. I said 80% (est.) of winnings. Jealous? Good, you should be. And you have what......for your net winnings? New shoes and socks? (LMFAO) Maybe you bought a new kitty cat?


Quote: Mrjjj
I dont play a system. Can you point out these OUTRAGEOUS 'claims' for us? (he won't do that folks, just watch).


Wow, a geez. You got me. I can't find where you've made an outrageous claim. Clearly your above posted claims are not in any way outrageous.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:44:15 PM permalink
mrjjj
Member since: Sep 4, 2010
Threads: 62
Posts: 1304
Hey Keyser/Snowman/Herb, take a look at my new signature.

What I want you to do......convince me that YOUR way of playing is better than my way. Get to work buddy and try and leave links off your posts. (lol)

BTW, how many forums are you NOW allowed to post at? Two? Unreal, I love it.

Ken
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it. Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:46:56 PM permalink
mrjjj
Member since: Sep 4, 2010
Threads: 62
Posts: 1304
Quote: Keyser
Wow, a geez. You got me. I can't find where you've made an outrageous claim. (Are you joking? If not, then reread what you have just written)


What are the 'outrageous claims'? Simple question. Did I say I never lose? Did I say I make 47K per week?

I'll let you off easy.....you dont even need to locate the posts. Give us a rough idea of what these 'claims' are. Thanks.

Ken
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it. Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:47:53 PM permalink
mrjjj
Member since: Sep 4, 2010
Threads: 62
Posts: 1304
WAITING >>

"offer a shred of mathematical proof/physics as to why it should work" >>> Still waiting on you cupcake. Where is your proof that YOU do well with AP (cough)? That usually quiets him down for a while. (lol)

Ken
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it. Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished.
July 31st, 2011 at 9:48:34 PM permalink
Keyser
Member since: Apr 16, 2010
Threads: 19
Posts: 578
I'm not into this post after post stuff.

All I can suggest to you is that you study the wizardofodds.com and read on the gambler's fallacy.

Please don't drown us in posts and banter, unless you can prove that the Wizard is wrong about your roulette systems/methods.
Page 6 of 7« First<34567>

 

Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard.
Here are my reasons why and my promise of support.