 | Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |
Okay, a question for......
| July 14th, 2011 at 3:19:50 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 | No, its not about hot numbers, calm down. A question for the non-roulette people. For the people who play against a very low HA. The 'skilled' players. (Good thing I have not eaten dinner yet) So I assume you are netting 10-20K per week? If no, why not? After everything I have read, you POSSESS that 'SKILL' (not luck), sounds like a sure thing to me. I'm not saying you dont have losing days, I did not ask that. Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 3:40:50 PM permalink | |
| SOOPOO Member since: Aug 8, 2010 Threads: 49 Posts: 1322 | I'll bite. When i play against a game with an inherent house edge I expect to lose, not win. Sometimes there may be variables, like comps, or match play coupons, that might slightly sway a house edge to my favor. Or perhaps dealer errors may give me a small advantage. But overall I would expect to lose money, not make money. As stated a gazillion times before, there are certain times when BJ may be a player advantage game, and if you can bet more those times and less on the times it is a House Advantage game, then you can make a positive weekly net. The same can be said for certain VP paytables. Since roulette, under all circumstances, has an extremely large house advantage, there should be no roulette player who would expect to consistently make a net profit. By the way, since you do not hijack threads, and everyone can quickly figure out where you are going with your posts/threads, I am very happy for you to be a member of the forum. Those who find your ideas silly just should not follow your threads... I still have my offer to you of dinner if you ever make it to western New York. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 3:48:12 PM permalink | |
| Ayecarumba Member since: Nov 17, 2009 Threads: 113 Posts: 2041 | I am not a "skilled" player, and do not expect to win consistently playing any game with a house advantage. However, as SOOPOO has already stated, BJ counters may have a small edge. I will also add that professional poker players have the opportunity to win consistently, as skill is a large part of the game. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 3:53:54 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 |
I am DUE for a vacation. I need one bad. Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 4:45:33 PM permalink | |
| MarieBicurie Member since: Sep 17, 2010 Threads: 4 Posts: 123 |
You assume correctly. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 4:51:37 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 |
Just so I dont misquote. You personally are netting 10-20K per week on a regular basis playing various casino games? Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 4:56:52 PM permalink | |
| MarieBicurie Member since: Sep 17, 2010 Threads: 4 Posts: 123 | You sound jealous. You asked a question, I answered it. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 5:01:08 PM permalink | |
| mrjjj Member since: Sep 4, 2010 Threads: 62 Posts: 1304 |
No, no, no, thank you for the reply. In case I quote you in the future, I want to make sure I am doing it correctly. Ken If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
Playing at the casino doesn't make you a pro any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. I prefer to be hated for telling the truth, than loved for telling a lie. No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way. Winners have simply formed the habit of doing things roulette AP players don't like to do. I'm sure AP (roulette) worked just fine back in 1923. Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. 5.26%, so what?......I get taxed everyday. Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Don't play/study roulette for a TOTAL of 9 hours in your lifetime and then preach that a person can not do 'well' with it.
Also, don't let the '2+2 will never equal 5' crowd bring you down. TRIAL & ERROR guys, I can't say it enough! When you're finished changing, you're finished. |
| July 14th, 2011 at 5:10:39 PM permalink | |
| MarieBicurie Member since: Sep 17, 2010 Threads: 4 Posts: 123 |
lol |
| July 14th, 2011 at 5:13:29 PM permalink | |
| EvenBob Member since: Jul 18, 2010 Threads: 231 Posts: 6398 | This MarieBicurie person seems to have a real problem with Ken, 3 threads about him and most of his posts are related to him. Hmmm, very curious, isn't it, this obsession. Don't you think so too, Ken? One casino owner to another: "It would be so much easier if we could just hit them over the head, steal their money, and throw their bodies in the creek." Al Swearengen, Deadwood |
| Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard. Here are my reasons why and my promise of support. |