You're the one who sent the message there and not here, when here is where the topic was discussed. Perhaps you knew being suspended there wouldn't affect you here. Nobody said you had to deliberately use the term "eyes squeezed shut". Blindly would have been a more effective word, but you wanted to make that dig. I think the best description is not that it was odd, but that he outsmarted you.Quote: EvenBob
I do think it's beyond odd that instead
of answering the PM, or addressing it
on DT, he drags it to another site to
whine about it. It's like he wanted the
biggest audience possible to witness
the depth of his wrongness in calling
something hate speech that was nothing
of the kind. Well, he did accomplish that,
I would like to say that Terapined is one of the nicest people we have on this forum and it is a better place as a result of his participation. Hopefully he will have no hard feelings upon his return.
Nobody said you had to deliberately use the term "eyes squeezed shut". Blindly would have been a more effective word, .
Oh relly. Wrong.Quote: EvenBob
You must be kidding. You're upset at my
choice of colloquialisms? There are
colloquialism police now? Trump is getting
here just in time. PC has gone haywire.
Eyes squeezed shut is more effective than
blind, just like 'burying your head in the sand'
is more effective than saying 'closing your
eyes'. When writing you want to convey
images, not just say words.
Oh relly. Wrong.