Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard.
Here are my reasons why and my promise of support.

FYI. AC Can Now Ban AP Players.

Page 9 of 12« First<6789101112>
January 8th, 2012 at 7:32:04 PM permalink
MathExtremist
Member since: Aug 31, 2010
Threads: 46
Posts: 2517
Quote: boymimbo
"controlled throwing" ... is a legal throw.
...
Sliding ... is absolutely illegal.

The law in Nevada is very explicit: "attempting to alter the criteria which determine the frequency of payment in a game is a felony".

A shooter picks up the dice, manipulates them in his or her hand, and releases them toward the far side of the table. Are you suggesting the legality of this action depends on the specific manipulation and release? There is nothing in the law that remotely hinges on such a distinction.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
January 8th, 2012 at 7:47:52 PM permalink
Keyser
Member since: Apr 16, 2010
Threads: 19
Posts: 575
MathExtremist,

If the team was actually breaking the law, then gaming officials would have filed charges against them. After having viewed the recorded action of the players, no charges were filed.

Maybe you should contact gaming and inform them that they are in error.
January 8th, 2012 at 7:57:04 PM permalink
MathExtremist
Member since: Aug 31, 2010
Threads: 46
Posts: 2517
I'm not as bold as you -- I don't pretend to know what the proper legal conclusion is. However, on October 12, 2011, I sent the following email to Clark County ADA Chris Owens dainfo (at) ccdanv.com:

Quote: my letter

Dear Mr. Owens,

I am writing in response to the recent incidence of dice sliding in craps reported at the Wynn Las Vegas casino. I have a question as to how to interpret certain provisions of NRS 465. Specifically, NRS 465.015 says:
1. “Cheat” means to alter the elements of chance, method of selection or criteria which determine:
(a) The result of a game;
(b) The amount or frequency of payment in a game;

I am curious as to whether there has been any caselaw or other statutory interpretation of the meaning of the word "alter" in that statute. In a first interpretation, "alter" means to physically change, such as by replacing fair dice in a craps game with toppers or loads -- and as such, a skilled method of throwing fair dice (such as sliding) would not be cheating under this statute. In a second interpretation, "alter" means to change the end results -- and as such, any skilled method of throwing the dice which results in a different probability distribution than standard dice would be cheating, even if done with fair dice. For example, a successful dice slide with one die staying face up on the number six would change the probability distribution from the standard odds (p(2) = 1/36, p(3) = 2/36, etc.) to one where the probability of numbers 7 through 12 is 1/6 each and the probability of numbers 2 through 6 is zero. I want to know if that would be "altering" per the meaning of NRS 465.015, specifically since the dice probabilities are what "determine ... (b) the ... frequency of payment" in the game of casino craps.

In short, I'd like to know your office's position on whether dice sliding or any other technique for skilfully influencing the results of fair dice (as there are several others) is "cheating", and therefore a felony to execute (or attempt) under NRS 465.

Thank you sincerely for your time.


I never received a reply.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
January 9th, 2012 at 4:38:25 AM permalink
SanchoPanza
Member since: May 10, 2010
Threads: 23
Posts: 727
Quote: Keyser
When someone is banned from a casino, the banned person's name is NOT added to some kind of state list. No such list exists. Many people confuse the "excluded, wanted, or denied list" with what they believe to be some kind of "banning" list. I believe this is also what confused Sancho near the beginning of the thread.

So "excluded" does not mean "banned" in your parlance. How unusual!
Quote:
These days, there appears to be more large wins that are being disputed by the casinos.

How in the world the poster could know this or even guess at it is beyond imagination.
Quote:
Such disputes are not published on the state website or made available to the general public in any manner.

If they are contested in court, they certainly are public record.
January 9th, 2012 at 6:24:47 AM permalink
ybot
Member since: Jan 8, 2012
Threads: 1
Posts: 17
The action of dice slidind may be a skill but it needs a big distraction of the pit.

It´s hard to accomplish without pit´s help or innaction.

Dice sliding is at the bounderies of legal and ilegal.

Game Commision acts as they were almighty god, then, not guilty players have their names in the websites as cheaters.

I guess slandered players have the right to sue GC but as everything in life they must wait for their best time to do it.
January 9th, 2012 at 9:47:09 AM permalink
Keyser
Member since: Apr 16, 2010
Threads: 19
Posts: 575
Quote: Sancho
So "excluded" does not mean "banned" in your parlance. How unusual!


Sancho,

Of course those people on that list are not allowed in the casinos. Those are people that are banned from ALL of the state's casinos. However the people that are banned by the casinos for card counting, etc. do not appear on those lists. I amazed that you believe otherwise.

Quote: Sancho
How in the world the poster could know this or even guess at it is beyond imagination.


Because I've been in such a situation. I've spoken with gaming attorneys regarding the situation and I've been through the process. I also have acquaintances that have also been through the process or that have worked with parties involved in a dispute.

Quote: Sancho
If they are contested in court, they certainly are public record.


In court, yes. However casino/patron disputes are NOT heard in court.

The process basically works like this: The first to hear a dispute is the gaming officer on duty. He then provides his ruling within I believe 24/48 hours or so. If the casino/patron choose to appeal that decision then it is heard by another a small group. They have 45 days to offer a response in writing. This is NOT a public court room. At these levels, there is no record that the public can go and view. This information is kept private out of public view. Only if the dispute is heard by the full gaming commission will you find record of it on the gaming control website.

The process lasts months and can progress through three administrative layers.

I can understand why you were confused, since the process is rather complicated, and because very few people have any experience with it.


-Keyser
January 10th, 2012 at 11:32:04 AM permalink
1BB
Member since: Oct 10, 2011
Threads: 7
Posts: 385
Quote: Keyser
It's really quite simple.

Take a stroll down the AC coast and ask the dealers and pit if the casino has been banning some gamblers.


I did just that this morning. I started with Trump Plaza where you were banned. I asked the pit manager, two pit bosses and several dealers. They were unanimous in saying,"Absolutely not!".

Before I could even finish the question,the pit manager referred to The Wizard of Vegas and said that they have this particular thread on their bulletin boards to read whenever they need a good laugh. The only thing this proves is that casino personnel are reading gambling websites but we already knew that.
I am benbakdoff -Member since: July 13,2010.
January 10th, 2012 at 1:14:15 PM permalink
EvenBob
Member since: Jul 18, 2010
Threads: 231
Posts: 6383
Quote: 1BB
I did just that this morning. I started with Trump Plaza where you were banned. I asked the pit manager, two pit bosses and several dealers. They were unanimous in saying,"Absolutely not!".


I told you thats what they'd say. No matter what
occurred they'll tell you nothing happened. Casinos
are very secretive about what they do, keeping
the public ignorant is part of their job. They want
to keep up the charade that they love winners,
when the exact opposite is true.
One casino owner to another: "It would be so much easier if we could just hit them over the head, steal their money, and throw their bodies in the creek." Al Swearengen, Deadwood
January 10th, 2012 at 1:56:20 PM permalink
DJTeddyBear
Member since: Nov 2, 2009
Threads: 105
Posts: 5699
Quote: 1BB
IBefore I could even finish the question,the pit manager referred to The Wizard of Vegas and said that they have this particular thread on their bulletin boards to read whenever they need a good laugh.
Now THAT'S funny.

But I wonder if they read some of the other AC stuff too.

For example, my extreme disapointment (and that of other players) that the Poker Snack Bar at Taj has closed.
Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood?
January 10th, 2012 at 2:02:52 PM permalink
Keyser
Member since: Apr 16, 2010
Threads: 19
Posts: 575
I suggest you return and talk to more people. I also don't believe the part about the Wizard's comments.
Page 9 of 12« First<6789101112>

 

Bovada is the only Internet casino endorsed by the Wizard.
Here are my reasons why and my promise of support.