steeldco
steeldco
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 4914
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
June 16th, 2014 at 1:16:04 PM permalink
In my case, this question is related to sports betting. However, I would think that it would be applicable to table games, etc.
Here's the question, at what point should you increase the size of your wager? Let's say that you have quintupled your original bankroll. Assume that you have a reasonable expectation of being able to keep on winning. Also, you are of the belief that all good things do not last forever. You want to roll it up.
Do you double or triple the size of your wager at this point? Also, if you continue to win, when do you increase the size again? Any thoughts?
DO NOT blindly accept what has been spoken. DO NOT blindly accept what has been written. Think. Assess. Lead. DO NOT blindly follow.
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11709
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
June 16th, 2014 at 1:22:52 PM permalink
Most people consider the Kelly criterion a good way to go.

Link

I think the best way to think of this is to always raise your bet a little bit after a win and always lower it a little bit after a loss. The most important part is to size your bet properly for your first bet.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
steeldco
steeldco
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 4914
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
June 16th, 2014 at 1:39:45 PM permalink
DRich, thank you for this. However, I would be uncomfortable increasing the size of the wager as much as what is shown in the Kelly bet formula. If I did the math correctly, then it calls for me to use nearly half of my bankroll each day. I would be increasing my wager size from 100 to 700 at this point. A little too rich for my liking.
DO NOT blindly accept what has been spoken. DO NOT blindly accept what has been written. Think. Assess. Lead. DO NOT blindly follow.
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11709
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
June 16th, 2014 at 1:43:09 PM permalink
Google Fractional Kelly betting. Basically just take the Kelly number and divide it by a factor of 10 (or whatever you are comfortable with). That way you are still increasing and decreasing based on Kelly, just in smaller increments.

Another common way is to split your bankroll up into n smaller bankrolls. Then use full kelly based on the smaller bankroll.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
steeldco
steeldco
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 4914
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
June 16th, 2014 at 1:46:56 PM permalink
DRich, got it. Excellent recommendation. Thanks! ......and DUH on my part......
DO NOT blindly accept what has been spoken. DO NOT blindly accept what has been written. Think. Assess. Lead. DO NOT blindly follow.
Lemieux66
Lemieux66
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1226
Joined: Feb 16, 2014
June 16th, 2014 at 1:55:28 PM permalink
Quote: steeldco

DRich, got it. Excellent recommendation. Thanks! ......and DUH on my part......



I'm probably going to get crucified for this, but Kelly betting isn't practical in a casino for table games. You are constantly changing your bet causing PB interest and dealer annoyance/confusion and it's tough to calculate on the fly in a quick manner. With that said, you can try to figure out where you are with Kelly and round down for safety and ease of use.
10 eyes for an eye. 10 teeth for a tooth. 10 bucks for a buck?! Hit the bad guys where it hurts the most: the face and the wallet.
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11709
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
June 16th, 2014 at 2:13:43 PM permalink
Quote: Lemieux66

I'm probably going to get crucified for this, but Kelly betting isn't practical in a casino for table games. You are constantly changing your bet causing PB interest and dealer annoyance/confusion and it's tough to calculate on the fly in a quick manner. With that said, you can try to figure out where you are with Kelly and round down for safety and ease of use.



I agree that rounding to some base unit makes sense.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
June 16th, 2014 at 2:38:34 PM permalink
Whenever I am sports betting I like to do something like the following.

When my bankroll is $200 I bet $10 per game. I increase my wager by $5 for every $100 it grows. Right now my small bankroll is at $450 so I am betting $20 a game. Hopefully in the next few days it will be $500 and I will bet $25
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11709
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
June 16th, 2014 at 2:55:01 PM permalink
Quote: GWAE

Whenever I am sports betting I like to do something like the following.

When my bankroll is $200 I bet $10 per game. I increase my wager by $5 for every $100 it grows. Right now my small bankroll is at $450 so I am betting $20 a game. Hopefully in the next few days it will be $500 and I will bet $25



A wise man once said, "if you never bet more than 2% of your bankroll, you will never go broke".
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
MangoJ
MangoJ
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 905
Joined: Mar 12, 2011
June 16th, 2014 at 2:58:19 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

That way you are still increasing and decreasing based on Kelly, just in smaller increments.



Well, you are not. There is either Kelly betting, or non-Kelly betting. The first one optimizes bankroll growth, the latter one doesn't.

If you can quantify your edge and your bankroll exactly, there is no reason to not bet Kelly. Any other betting strategy underperforms.
steeldco
steeldco
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 4914
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
June 16th, 2014 at 3:08:42 PM permalink
Quote: MangoJ

Well, you are not. There is either Kelly betting, or non-Kelly betting. The first one optimizes bankroll growth, the latter one doesn't.

If you can quantify your edge and your bankroll exactly, there is no reason to not bet Kelly. Any other betting strategy underperforms.



You would be correct, however, DRich was just giving me an option since I didn't want to raise my wagers as high as Kelly would call for it to be.
I settled at one-half of the Kelly number.......maybe because I'm just a half-assed kind guy.....
DO NOT blindly accept what has been spoken. DO NOT blindly accept what has been written. Think. Assess. Lead. DO NOT blindly follow.
Deucekies
Deucekies
  • Threads: 57
  • Posts: 1425
Joined: Jan 20, 2014
June 16th, 2014 at 3:28:33 PM permalink
With regards to table games, "bankroll" refers to full bankroll, not just buy-in. Is that correct?

For example, if my buy-in is $300, and I determine I have a 1% advantage, Kelly would suggest I only wager $3. That can't be right, can it? I can see playing only $3 hands if $300 was my whole bankroll though.
Casinos are not your friends, they want your money. But so does Disneyland. And there is no chance in hell that you will go to Disneyland and come back with more money than you went with. - AxelWolf and Mickeycrimm
Lemieux66
Lemieux66
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1226
Joined: Feb 16, 2014
June 16th, 2014 at 3:30:40 PM permalink
Quote: Deucekies

With regards to table games, "bankroll" refers to full bankroll, not just buy-in. Is that correct?

For example, if my buy-in is $300, and I determine I have a 1% advantage, Kelly would suggest I only wager $3. That can't be right, can it? I can see playing only $3 hands if $300 was my whole bankroll though.



Kelly is good stuff for sports betting. Your bankroll seems low right now so since you really only see $10 min tables(sometimes 5) so you have a 2k or at least 1k roll right now?
10 eyes for an eye. 10 teeth for a tooth. 10 bucks for a buck?! Hit the bad guys where it hurts the most: the face and the wallet.
Deucekies
Deucekies
  • Threads: 57
  • Posts: 1425
Joined: Jan 20, 2014
June 16th, 2014 at 3:35:09 PM permalink
Quote: Lemieux66

Kelly is good stuff for sports betting. Your bankroll seems low right now so since you really only see $10 min tables(sometimes 5) so you have a 2k or at least 1k roll right now?


I pulled the $300 number out of thin air as an example. I just want to make sure Kelly is a ratio of wager-to-bankroll, not wager-to-buyin.
Casinos are not your friends, they want your money. But so does Disneyland. And there is no chance in hell that you will go to Disneyland and come back with more money than you went with. - AxelWolf and Mickeycrimm
MangoJ
MangoJ
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 905
Joined: Mar 12, 2011
June 16th, 2014 at 3:46:16 PM permalink
An interesting question regarding sport betting, as a single bet can span over several days or even weeks:

If your edge is 1% per bet on say an even money bet, you can get 10 opportunities per day, and each bet takes 10 days to resolve, what is the optimum bet amount ? Still 1% of your bankroll ? And if so, how do you account for unresolved bet in your bankroll ?

If you would account unresolved bets to your bankroll in full value, you have a non-zero probability of getting broke (something that Kelly betting doesn't allow, as log(0) is -infintity, and cannot occur for any finite probability).

If ou cannot ccount unresolved bets to your bankroll in full, what's the correct partial value ? Does it depend on the number of days left ?
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
June 16th, 2014 at 7:05:19 PM permalink
Quote: MangoJ

An interesting question regarding sport betting, as a single bet can span over several days or even weeks:

If your edge is 1% per bet on say an even money bet, you can get 10 opportunities per day, and each bet takes 10 days to resolve, what is the optimum bet amount ? Still 1% of your bankroll ? And if so, how do you account for unresolved bet in your bankroll ?

If you would account unresolved bets to your bankroll in full value, you have a non-zero probability of getting broke (something that Kelly betting doesn't allow, as log(0) is -infintity, and cannot occur for any finite probability).

If ou cannot ccount unresolved bets to your bankroll in full, what's the correct partial value ? Does it depend on the number of days left ?



Kelly is based on the fact that every time you have an opportunity to make a decision, you want to maximize E(log(bankroll)).

You can still figure out how to maximize this if you have different bets riding with different probabilities of winning. It just makes the function that you need to maximize more complex.
  • Jump to: