Poll

2 votes (10.52%)
7 votes (36.84%)
8 votes (42.1%)
2 votes (10.52%)

19 members have voted

WizardofEngland
WizardofEngland
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 638
Joined: Nov 2, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 8:35:47 AM permalink
In a tournament it’s folded to me on the small blind.
I reach for my chips and the Big Blind announces "If you raise I will go all in".
I raise.
He folds.

Should he be forced to go all in since he verbally declared he would if I raised?

How would you rule?
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
kenarman
kenarman
  • Threads: 28
  • Posts: 966
Joined: Nov 22, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 8:40:39 AM permalink
Quote: WizardofEngland

In a tournament it’s folded to me on the small blind.
I reach for my chips and the Big Blind announces "If you raise I will go all in".
I raise.
He folds.

Should he be forced to go all in since he verbally declared he would if I raised?

How would you rule?



In many poker rooms this would be considered angling and the player could face some kind of penalty or expulsion.
Be careful when you follow the masses, the M is sometimes silent.
Croupier
Croupier
  • Threads: 58
  • Posts: 1258
Joined: Nov 15, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 8:42:35 AM permalink
I sometimes supervise the card room where I work. I have voted for option 3 but need to qualify my answer.

If the other player does it once, Id let it slide. If the player is consitantly known for such bad etiquette speech plays, he would be warned, then punished if it happens again.

The other consideration is action out of turn. If it was his turn to speak, verbal declarations would be binding. However verbal declarations out of turn are a difficult one to call. Most of the time in these situations you have to use your knowledge of the players to aid in your decisions.
[This space is intentionally left blank]
WizardofEngland
WizardofEngland
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 638
Joined: Nov 2, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 8:44:25 AM permalink
Quote: Croupier

I sometimes supervise the card room where I work. I have voted for option 3 but need to qualify my answer.

If the other player does it once, Id let it slide. If the player is consitantly known for such bad etiquette speech plays, he would be warned, then punished if it happens again.

The other consideration is action out of turn. If it was his turn to speak, verbal declarations would be binding. However verbal declarations out of turn are a difficult one to call. Most of the time in these situations you have to use your knowledge of the players to aid in your decisions.



I think that is the right answer. I've played a fair bit of pub poker, and things like that are said all the time, but in a casino I would say its actually a bit out of order when real sums of money are at stake.
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 207
  • Posts: 10992
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 9:00:30 AM permalink
In most poker rooms, acting out of turn is not binding. Therefore, verbal declarations are equally non-binding.

In some rooms, if you put out chips to call a bet, without realizing that there was a raise, you can fold, but the chips stay out.

Once again, consult Robert's Rules, or the poker room's own rule set.


Note that again, the rule may be different in a cash game vs a tourney.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 9:50:28 AM permalink
It's a bit of an angle shot, but also neither binding nor illegal. The main reason such talk should be allowed is that enforcing a prohibition against it would be a nightmare. Example: Player A raises, Player B looks thoughtful and then gestures as if he will move in with his entire stack. Player A says, "Careful!" Who gets sanctioned? Anybody?
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
Ayecarumba
Ayecarumba
  • Threads: 236
  • Posts: 6763
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 9:51:24 AM permalink
Quote: WizardofEngland

In a tournament it’s folded to me on the small blind.
I reach for my chips and the Big Blind announces "If you raise I will go all in".
I raise.
He folds.

Should he be forced to go all in since he verbally declared he would if I raised?

How would you rule?



Quote: Croupier

The other consideration is action out of turn. If it was his turn to speak, verbal declarations would be binding. However verbal declarations out of turn are a difficult one to call. Most of the time in these situations you have to use your knowledge of the players to aid in your decisions.



Technically, it was his turn to act next. He was shooting an angle. I would hold him to the verbal contract.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 9:54:50 AM permalink
Quote: Ayecarumba

Technically, it was his turn to act next. He was shooting an angle. I would hold him to the verbal contract.



It was his turn to act NEXT, but it was not his turn to act. Most poker room rule sets say that only actions/declarations in turn are binding.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
slyther
slyther
  • Threads: 13
  • Posts: 691
Joined: Feb 1, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 11:25:44 AM permalink
It's table talk at best, possibly an angle at worst. Definitely not binding.
Croupier
Croupier
  • Threads: 58
  • Posts: 1258
Joined: Nov 15, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 11:59:44 AM permalink
Even 6 renowned Poker Figures can not agree on the correct ruling.
[This space is intentionally left blank]
WizardofEngland
WizardofEngland
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 638
Joined: Nov 2, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 12:06:00 PM permalink
Quote: Croupier

Even 6 renowned Poker Figures can not agree on the correct ruling.



I knew you would reveal my source!! Damn you!! ;-)
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
Croupier
Croupier
  • Threads: 58
  • Posts: 1258
Joined: Nov 15, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 12:07:40 PM permalink
Sorry. I just remembered reading something similar in the back of a poker magazine at work, so thought I would hunt it out. Although maybe we could come up with some more interesting scenarios of our own.
[This space is intentionally left blank]
WizardofEngland
WizardofEngland
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 638
Joined: Nov 2, 2010
January 24th, 2011 at 12:09:18 PM permalink
Quote: Croupier

Sorry. I just remembered reading something similar in the back of a poker magazine at work, so thought I would hunt it out. Although maybe we could come up with some more interesting scenarios of our own.



I have four more of my own, I just that one was quite interesting.
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
Croupier
Croupier
  • Threads: 58
  • Posts: 1258
Joined: Nov 15, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 12:13:36 PM permalink
Quote: WizardofEngland

I have four more of my own, I just that one was quite interesting.



THen get posting. Im curious now.
[This space is intentionally left blank]
Asswhoopermcdaddy
Asswhoopermcdaddy
  • Threads: 87
  • Posts: 566
Joined: Nov 30, 2009
January 24th, 2011 at 12:57:13 PM permalink
Quote: WizardofEngland

In a tournament it’s folded to me on the small blind.
I reach for my chips and the Big Blind announces "If you raise I will go all in".
I raise.
He folds.

Should he be forced to go all in since he verbally declared he would if I raised?

How would you rule?



Verbal declarations are not binding. It comes across as more of a threat/taunt than anything else. I think its poor etiquette. You should chide him and ask "what happened about going all in on my raise? your hand looking a little cold?"
P90
P90
  • Threads: 12
  • Posts: 1703
Joined: Jan 8, 2011
January 24th, 2011 at 6:17:57 PM permalink
If it were up to me, I'd consider soft angling (anything short of actually performing the action) to be legitimate if occasionally unwelcome part of the deception-heavy game that is NLH, though it might be out of place in less aggressive variants. In some rooms rules might be different, in which case a TD would have to base his decision on them, of course. But even so this is especially less practical to enforce if it's not a made decision but a set of if-then-else clauses.

What if he said "If player 4 raises less than 4BB, I raise 165% of his raise, else 100% up to $12, if flop is dry I call up to $22, except if player 2 raises call up to $45 or if player 5 raises call up to $10, if flop is 2 face cards or more I raise 8%+14% for each face card+random value 0% to 17%, up to $96, except if player 5 raises more than $50 or more than 75% of the pot but no less than $30, then call up to 18% of my stack unless player 2 folded, then up to 22%" ?
Resist ANFO Boston PRISM Stormfront IRA Freedom CIA Obama
WizardofEngland
WizardofEngland
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 638
Joined: Nov 2, 2010
January 25th, 2011 at 2:02:21 AM permalink
Quote: P90

What if he said "If player 4 raises less than 4BB, I raise 165% of his raise, else 100% up to $12, if flop is dry I call up to $22, except if player 2 raises call up to $45 or if player 5 raises call up to $10, if flop is 2 face cards or more I raise 8%+14% for each face card+random value 0% to 17%, up to $96, except if player 5 raises more than $50 or more than 75% of the pot but no less than $30, then call up to 18% of my stack unless player 2 folded, then up to 22%" ?



If he said all that, he would scare the living daylights out of me.

I have been known to come out with some funny phrases when heads-up.

"If I were you, I would want me to fold. But you want me to raise. So I check" They nearly always just check after that...
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13951
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
January 25th, 2011 at 5:34:50 AM permalink
I would warn him, explaining this is a poker room an not a home game. While out-of-turn declarations are not binding they are also not allowed. If he wants to calim that is table-talk he can talk like that only between hands.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26481
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
January 25th, 2011 at 7:29:41 AM permalink
Quote: AZDuffman

I would warn him, explaining this is a poker room an not a home game. While out-of-turn declarations are not binding they are also not allowed. If he wants to calim that is table-talk he can talk like that only between hands.



This is close to my opinion. I think truthful out-of-turn declarations should be allowed. Untruthful ones should be punished as ungentlemanly behavior, a warning the first time, and suspension the next time. The other players would do well to spread the story, so that the offender would become known as a dirty player.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
WizardofEngland
WizardofEngland
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 638
Joined: Nov 2, 2010
January 25th, 2011 at 7:33:43 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

The other players would do well to spread the story, so that the offender would become known as a dirty player.



The poker room is question is a close knit group already. Average entries to the saturday night tournament are 40-80 players (nothing compared to Vegas I guess) but I would say only 15 are real regulars. The person in question was just another unknown.
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
  • Jump to: