onenickelmiracle
onenickelmiracle
Joined: Jan 26, 2012
  • Threads: 118
  • Posts: 4589
December 25th, 2016 at 5:10:12 PM permalink
Winning so much though might be noticeable. Doesn't matter if they can't see the bets if they can see a stack taking over the table. If that was the angle, you'd think they'd rat hole in their coat pocket.
Looks like sh!t just got imaginary!
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
December 25th, 2016 at 5:43:14 PM permalink
Here's what I really don't understand. Nobody has stacks of purple on the table from betting red/green, it just doesn't happen. A "stack" of purple is 20 x 500 = $10,000. If I did the math right, he had a +$23 EV/hand, so he's only expected to win $914/hour. (Only, heh.) But misdealing notwithstanding, nothing changes about the card probabilities and you only have a 1/4 chance (per hour) of hitting anything bigger than trips and therefore of winning more than $500 at any one time. So at $914/hour, it's still hours of play to get to stacks of purple. What were the bosses thinking as he slowly and continually took their money? How does a casino let something like that go on for longer than four hours, for example?
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 10361
December 25th, 2016 at 5:56:53 PM permalink
One of our teammates got quads twice within 20 minutes. Both with made pocket pairs (6's or better). $h!t happens.
"And that's the bottom lineeeee, cuz Stone Cold said so!"
Hunterhill
Hunterhill
Joined: Aug 1, 2011
  • Threads: 38
  • Posts: 1355
December 25th, 2016 at 6:18:42 PM permalink
Quote: MathExtremist

Here's what I really don't understand. Nobody has stacks of purple on the table from betting red/green, it just doesn't happen. A "stack" of purple is 20 x 500 = $10,000. If I did the math right, he had a +$23 EV/hand, so he's only expected to win $914/hour. (Only, heh.) But misdealing notwithstanding, nothing changes about the card probabilities and you only have a 1/4 chance (per hour) of hitting anything bigger than trips and therefore of winning more than $500 at any one time. So at $914/hour, it's still hours of play to get to stacks of purple. What were the bosses thinking as he slowly and continually took their money? How does a casino let something like that go on for longer than four hours, for example?


That's what I was thinking also, so it seems likely that he hit some big hands.
What we've got here is failure to communicate
beachbumbabs
Administrator
beachbumbabs
Joined: May 21, 2013
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 8878
December 25th, 2016 at 7:21:35 PM permalink
Quote: MathExtremist

Here's what I really don't understand. Nobody has stacks of purple on the table from betting red/green, it just doesn't happen. A "stack" of purple is 20 x 500 = $10,000. If I did the math right, he had a +$23 EV/hand, so he's only expected to win $914/hour. (Only, heh.) But misdealing notwithstanding, nothing changes about the card probabilities and you only have a 1/4 chance (per hour) of hitting anything bigger than trips and therefore of winning more than $500 at any one time. So at $914/hour, it's still hours of play to get to stacks of purple. What were the bosses thinking as he slowly and continually took their money? How does a casino let something like that go on for longer than four hours, for example?



I figured the game pays odds on winning hands, and he may have hit a few. He could also be coloring up as he goes.
"If the house lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game."
DeMango
DeMango
Joined: Feb 2, 2010
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1767
December 25th, 2016 at 11:04:42 PM permalink
Heck, what's to stop him from one red, three green, assuming a $100 table.
RS
RS
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
  • Threads: 49
  • Posts: 5113
December 25th, 2016 at 11:34:38 PM permalink
Seems like part of it would be 3x vs 1/3x...would definitely help if it was a $10 min.
"should of played 'Go Fish' today ya peasant" -typoontrav
JB
Administrator
JB
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
  • Threads: 334
  • Posts: 2052
December 26th, 2016 at 3:40:40 AM permalink
Unless I'm missing something (wouldn't be the first time), this guy had two advantages:

1) he was allowed to bet less than his ante

2) he was allowed to past-post:

Quote:

he makes his hand on 5th street and proceeds to bet $90


Normally the final bet must be placed before the last community card is revealed. As described, the final bet came after the last community card was revealed.

Surely the past-posting provided the bigger advantage.
Last edited by: JB on Dec 26, 2016
odiousgambit
odiousgambit
Joined: Nov 9, 2009
  • Threads: 274
  • Posts: 7175
December 26th, 2016 at 5:04:21 AM permalink
Quote: JB

Surely the past-posting provided the bigger advantage.



I missed that. I'm not sure the OP meant to indicate past-posting as it's not emphasized.
"We thank with brief thanksgiving Whatever gods may be That no man lives forever, That dead men rise up never" Nor any gambler the long run see ever ........apologies to Swinburne for that last line
beachbumbabs
Administrator
beachbumbabs
Joined: May 21, 2013
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 8878
December 26th, 2016 at 5:30:39 AM permalink
I didn't read what he said as past posting either, just that he made his hand on the last bet (before the river was exposed). Normal to the game. I could be wrong.
"If the house lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game."

  • Jump to: