GeorgeIgnatius
GeorgeIgnatius
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Apr 16, 2017
April 16th, 2017 at 6:11:25 PM permalink
I've been using the Zen Count Strategy in the back of Snyder's Blackbelt in Blackjack for the past few years.  I'm also studying the Advanced Omega 2 Count Strategy.  I don't understand why the AO2 7.1 Table numbers are different by a factor of 4, in comparison to the Zen Strategy Table.  Example, when holding a 12 vs Dealer 6, the Zen Table has player hitting at true count less than -4, but the AO2 table has player hitting at true count less than -14.  The Zen and AO2 counting systems are very similar, but the strategy tables are very different.  Why?
RS
RS
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 8626
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
April 16th, 2017 at 6:23:37 PM permalink
Probably divides RC by quarter decks instead of full decks?
GeorgeIgnatius
GeorgeIgnatius
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Apr 16, 2017
April 16th, 2017 at 7:22:48 PM permalink
Thanks RS, I've been going in circles trying to figure it out....... Snyder uses 1/4 decks which he explains in Ch.8 of Blackbelt in Blackjack, and Carlson uses full decks in Blackjack for Blood. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
  • Jump to: