Singer's evidence of VP non-randomness and betting system

A guy by the name of Fezzik humiliated this kid Singer a long time ago on some type of video poker challenge.

Quote: RobSinger

A) The low end is 75% in Nevada/the high end is private between the manufacturers and the casinos and must be disclosed to the state. It cannot be changed without first informing the state in writing which must be approved. I was told the only time the state would not approve a request was for the Reserve, 3 months after it opened.

Sounds very official. Could you cite the specific legislation? As you well know, a law can not exist in secret.
The 75% low limit applies to game house edge with correct play. What's more, regulations require game machines that display cards to deal them exactly like they would be dealt from a real random deck, making such a "safety net" incompatible with the law.

Quote: RobSinger

B) You may intend secret to be the equal of confidential, but the standard for their interpretation is the US DoD. SECRET is a great deal more restricted than CONFIDENTIAL.

Unclassified/Restricted/Confidential/Secret/TS levels apply only to the government and its agencies.

Private parties can only have unprotected and protected information. Laws that the protection comes from and disclosure rules can vary (trade secrets have primarily civil protection, privilege has criminal), but these are not levels.

No private party has any form of legal protection for its secrets that resembles government's classification; only the government and its agencies have the power of classifying information. Even if a company for some reason marks one of its documents "TS/SCI" and another "Restricted", it's legal recourse abilities against unauthorized disclosure will be exactly the same.