A roulette method with teeth

"It appears that you spend all of your time posting on here. Four posts in a row, and 45 posts since registering on Sept 4" >>> Isn't that self explanatory? If there are a ton of questions or slamming me, I will of course politely respond. I'm not one of those guys that 'goes away', get use to me. Ken

Hey DeMango, AZDuffman and mkl >>> You guys NEVER answered me. How do you play roulette? I assume you kick a** playing?

@mkl >> Also, what game do you play with your 'advantage'? Can you explain it to all of us? Thanks buddy, Ken

ROFL, nice try mkl, I read your last post. Listen up Mary, we can spot a bitter guy a mile out and YOU fit the bill. You troll around on boards looking for trouble and then pat yourself on the back afterwards. Your ONLY ammo is to LIE to fellow posters. What a shame, you need help. Walk it like you talk it, thats all WE ask from you bro. I spent around 20 minutes reading some of your past posts from other threads.

I see the SAME hostility in most of your posts. If you cant win, so what, move on. You have too much shame built up for being a loser in the gambling world. I have posted MANY times regarding losing ALOT of money playing roulette. Trust me, it does suck. The difference between you and I? I admit to my losses, you dont. Work on that and come back to the forum when and only when you feel you can cope. As a matter of fact, email me first, I'll give you the 'ok' if I think you should come back. Ken

We need some baccarat systems.

From who, me? lol I never played the game, never will. Its roulette or NOTHING. Ken

I read through to page 4 and got bored, but figured I would jump in here.

The main difference that I see is this:
The Proponent/Author - Belief that future events relate to past events on the roulette wheel
The Dissentors - Belief that events are stochastic and independent

So, who cares what his system does or what the simulations say...the real question is are roulette wheels innately biased in some way and if you record enough numbers over time could you empirically determine his "X" value for betting a "hot" street.
So, mr. system how many numbers have you recorded to develop this trend and for which wheel in which casino?
To me it is entirely plausible that all wheels have a bias but the bias is not cosmic (ala gamblers fallacy), it is equipment related.
Recall also, humans have evolved to see patterns...it is in our genetics, and in general we will see patterns even where they don't exist...math, statistics and simulation can all help prove or disprove what we think we see.
So, to the author, please post your raw data on spins and your raw data on performance...
thanks

Quote: rtpud

So, who cares what his system does or what the simulations say...the real question is are roulette wheels innately biased in some way and if you record enough numbers over time could you empirically determine his "X" value for betting a "hot" street.
So, mr. system how many numbers have you recorded to develop this trend and for which wheel in which casino?
To me it is entirely plausible that all wheels have a bias but the bias is not cosmic (ala gamblers fallacy), it is equipment related.

All roulette wheels *do* have bias. There's no such thing as a mechanical device for generating a perfect uniform distribution. The problem is that you (the player) can't detect it or exploit it prior to the casino finding out about it, unless they're really falling asleep at the switch. Many roulette tables have bias-tracking software running which does an ongoing statistical analysis of the outcome distribution and will signal when/if a wheel becomes questionably-balanced. That software is programmed to raise red flags before the bias becomes exploitable. For example, if the 00 spot happened 1% more often than it should, with the rest of the spots decreasing slightly to compensate, you still don't have the edge betting on 00.

The point is that if you think charting numbers at a roulette wheel is going to help you beat the wheel, don't bother. The casino gets to use a computer and you don't:

Quote: Nevada Revised Statutes

NRS 465.075 Use of device for calculating probabilities. It is unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, any device to assist:
3. In analyzing the probability of the occurrence of an event relating to the game;

how does this thread have this many posts?

LOL!! It's another "system" vs. "math" thread! Always entertaining...and will always get high traffic around here for some reason.....

Quote: Ericayne

LOL!! It's another "system" vs. "math" thread! Always entertaining...and will always get high traffic around here for some reason.....

It's more like stupidity vs. rationality. However, the world DOES need stupid people--to play the lottery, to pack the stadiums at monster truck rallies, to stop bullets, to buy Budweiser--so perhaps we shouldn't be so hard on people like jjj. After all, if not for him and his ilk, casino games would be even worse than they are now.